> Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
Hi. I've got the following errors:
> Error:
> Problem 1: package openjfx-devel-3:11.0.9.2-6.fc35.x86_64 requires
openjfx(x86-64) = 3:11.0.9.2-6.fc35, but none of the providers can be
installed
> -
know.
However, in my case all the three packages have the same (upstream)
author and the same packager, so forward hint in sstp-client is not a
problem and seems more natural.
Marcin
>
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 8:51 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 2
On 2022-04-23 20:40, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 2:32 PM Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
>>
>> Hi. My package sstp-client (a SSTP VPN client) can be used on it's own,
>> but usually it is recommended to have also the NetworkManager-sstp
>> plugin. "Rec
Hi. My package sstp-client (a SSTP VPN client) can be used on it's own,
but usually it is recommended to have also the NetworkManager-sstp
plugin. "Recommends" seems to be a good idea here as NM is usually
available by default.
However, there is also NetworkManager-sstp-gnome which adds an applet
On 2022-04-22 20:52, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 3:45 AM Vipul Siddharth
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 12:49 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
>>>
>>> Why post something that has expired?
>> Hi leigh, When I shared the email, the giveaway was still active :)
>> given it was just
On 2022-04-22 11:01, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 11:12:41PM +0200, Marcin Zajączkowski napsal(a):
>> Upgrading NetworkManager-sstp to the latest version, I've noticed that
>> there is a failed test related to missing branch protection on AArch64
>> [1].
>
&
Hi,
Upgrading NetworkManager-sstp to the latest version, I've noticed that
there is a failed test related to missing branch protection on AArch64
[1]. After reading that and [2], I know what it is all about, however, I
wonder what is the best way to apply it to my package?
Should I check if the
On 2020-09-21 12:08, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2020-09-21 at 08:55 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> On 9/21/20 12:25 AM, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
>>> Hi. There is an ongoing problem with conflicting build-ids in chromium
>>> and chromium-freeworl
Hi. There is an ongoing problem with conflicting build-ids in chromium
and chromium-freeworld [1][2]:
> Error: Transaction test error:
> file /usr/lib/.build-id/61/91aba223f60784c4a2fb95cdedcedc97217e5b from
> install of chromium-freeworld-85.0.4183.102-1.fc32.x86_64 conflicts with file
> from
On 2019-02-17 03:30, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Marcin Zajączkowski wrote on 2019/02/17 6:55:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After some packages (such as Fish [1]) are released to Fedora modular
>> repository I would like to download them from Koji and play with them
>> (to provide f
Hi,
After some packages (such as Fish [1]) are released to Fedora modular
repository I would like to download them from Koji and play with them
(to provide feedback) not having to wait until a request to move to the
testing repository is accepted.
Unfortunately there are no RPM packages for
On 2018-07-20 00:26, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> I looked at libattr and in the changelog, there's this:
>> * Tue Jul 17 2018 Kamil Dudka 2.4.48-3
>> - temporarily provide attr/xattr.h symlink until users are migrated
>> (#1601482)
>
> The bugzilla ticket says that attr/xattr.h was removed from
Hi,
After the recent gcc removal from build root [1] I added explicit
dependency on gcc [2], but even though my pyxattr package started to
fail with [3][4]:
> xattr.c:532:56: error: 'ENOATTR' undeclared (first use in this function); did
> you mean 'ENOTTY'?
I've checked it and ENOATTR should be
On 2016-08-16 16:43, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2016-08-16 at 15:54 +0200, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Trying to build just unretired package I've got:
>>>
>>> 15275573 build (rawhide, /rpms/sstp-
>>> client:35a9c870ac0ce9d1c01e9
Hi,
Trying to build just unretired package I've got:
> 15275573 build (rawhide,
> /rpms/sstp-client:35a9c870ac0ce9d1c01e93929dea2513d9bfb366): open
> (arm02-builder20.arm.fedoraproject.org) ->
> FAILED: BuildError: package sstp-client is blocked for tag f26
Hi guys,
I plan to take over sstp-client package [1] which has been orphaned two
months ago in F24+. It is required by my new package -
NetworkManager-sstp [2].
[1] - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/sstp-client/
[2] -
On 2016-06-30 04:27, Ahmad Samir wrote:
> On 30 June 2016 at 01:21, Marcin Zajączkowski <msz...@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm a maintainer of NetworkManager-sstp package and before 1.2.0 final
>> will be released I experimenting in my CORP repo with pre-r
Hi,
I'm a maintainer of NetworkManager-sstp package and before 1.2.0 final
will be released I experimenting in my CORP repo with pre-release Git
version. I've encountered a situation which - I'm not sure - is a
problem with my configuration or some issue with dependencies resolving.
$ sudo dnf
better to have that interface in the internal Fedora infrastructure one day.
Marcin
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015, 09:36 Marcin Zajączkowski <msz...@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose a minor (yet important) change in one of the
>> Fedora
Hi,
I would like to propose a minor (yet important) change in one of the
Fedora packages configuration (a SPEC file and/or a patch). Is it
possible to create (something like) a pull request which could be
reviewed by the maintainer in some convenient way (*) and optionally
merged? Or the only way
Hi,
I plan to retire fuse-smb which allows to mount SMB/Samba shares as
local directories before F21 is branched (2014-07-08).
There have been no new versions since 2008 and the maintainer is not
going to fix problem with crashes related to multi threading issues in
libsmbclient 3.2+. There had
Hi,
Starting from the version 0.4 pylibacl Python extension changed its
license from GPLv2+ to LGPLv2+. As the new license is less restrictive I
don't see any negative implications.
Regards
Marcin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
22 matches
Mail list logo
