Re: Unretire ulogd (or another NFLOG logger?)

2024-02-21 Thread Thomas Haller
On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 07:37 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > I'd like to use NFLOG to log firewall drops (so that the kernel > message > log isn't spammed by them), but it doesn't appear there's anything > currently in Fedora that can read that other than "tcpdump -i nflog". > It looks like ulogd was

Unretire ulogd (Userspace logging daemon for netfilter)

2024-02-21 Thread Thomas Haller
Hi, I'd like to unretire ulogd (aka ulogd2). Please see the re-review bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2265387 Thank you, Thomas -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: F40 Change Proposal: Wifi MAC Randomization (System Wide)

2023-12-21 Thread Thomas Haller
Hi, On Thu, 2023-12-21 at 16:08 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 2:49 PM Tom Hughes via devel > wrote: > > > > On 21/12/2023 14:33, Steven A. Falco wrote: > > > On 12/21/23 08:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott > > > > > > > >

Re: dnf conflict in rawhide Docker container in GitHub Action

2023-11-13 Thread Thomas Haller
On Mon, 2023-11-13 at 11:50 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:02:29AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > Neither I nor nirik can reproduce this as described. > > Anyhow, as far as I can see the image is the GA f39 image and is > right > and correct, it's just the web page

Re: dnf conflict in rawhide Docker container in GitHub Action

2023-11-13 Thread Thomas Haller
On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 12:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 19:07 +, Chris Kelley wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I have a GitHub Action > > (https://github.com/dogtagpki/jss/actions/runs/5810230552/job/15794 > > 978022) that fails due to a conflict between dnf and dnf5

Re: F37 Change Proposal: MAC Address Policy none (System-Wide Change)

2023-02-07 Thread Thomas Haller
Hi, After this change missed F37, it's now testable in F38: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemd/pull-request/100 systemd-253~rc2-3.fc38 Thanks Dusty, zbyszek! Thomas ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: F37 Change Proposal: MAC Address Policy none (System-Wide Change)

2022-06-27 Thread Thomas Haller
On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 17:26 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 27/06/2022 17:09, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > On 27/06/2022 17:05, Thomas Haller wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 13:09 +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > > > > > > > Twice

Re: F37 Change Proposal: MAC Address Policy none (System-Wide Change)

2022-06-27 Thread Thomas Haller
On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 13:34 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I'm not "blaming" the tools, I completely understand that they were > written a long time ago. But in fact the issue is fairly generic: any > software which interacts with devices that udev also touches MUST > wait > for

Re: F37 Change Proposal: MAC Address Policy none (System-Wide Change)

2022-06-27 Thread Thomas Haller
On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 10:10 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 12:36:14AM +0530, Vipul Siddharth wrote: > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > > community feedback.

Re: F37 Change Proposal: MAC Address Policy none (System-Wide Change)

2022-06-27 Thread Thomas Haller
On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 10:10 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > - Deviate from upstream systemd. > > It is also important to mention that Fedora will "deviate" from > itself > (it's former self). We would be changing a default in place since > ~2013 [1]. > > [1]

Re: F37 Change Proposal: MAC Address Policy none (System-Wide Change)

2022-06-27 Thread Thomas Haller
Hi, On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 13:09 +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > Twice now I have had to go and reconfigure my networks after a Fedora > upgrade has changed the MAC assignment policy. Interesting. Are you sure it was twice? I thought it changed "only" once in F31 (2019). Thomas

Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide

2022-02-01 Thread Thomas Haller
On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 14:00 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 11:09 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:32:22AM +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > > > On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 23:57 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > > A

Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide

2022-01-27 Thread Thomas Haller
On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 11:09 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:32:22AM +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 23:57 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > A new gcc with most importantly the https://gcc.gnu.org/PR104172 > > > bug (t

Re: gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 now in rawhide

2022-01-27 Thread Thomas Haller
On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 23:57 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > A new gcc with most importantly the https://gcc.gnu.org/PR104172 > bug (that caused a lot of ppc64le failures) fixed and various other > fixes (e.g. std::basic_string(std::nullptr_t) = deleted only done > for C++23 etc.) is now in

Re: Manual intervention required: broken /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/resolv.conf for F33 early adopters

2020-09-11 Thread Thomas Haller
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 10:28 +, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote: > From here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863041#c46 I > have expected what newly-created connection would work properly > without manually changing ipv4.dns-search to ~. on the specific VPN > connection. Hi, I think you

Re: Manual intervention required: broken /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/resolv.conf for F33 early adopters

2020-09-10 Thread Thomas Haller
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 06:53 +, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote: > And after creating a fresh VPN connection via NetworkManager name > resolving not working again. > > # ping git.sbis.ru > ping: git.sbis.ru: Name or service not known > > $ resolvectl domain > Global: > Link 2 (enp5s0): ~. > Link 3

Re: NetworkManager keyfile instead of ifcfg-rh - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal

2020-06-29 Thread Thomas Haller
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 12:00 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 6/29/20 11:44 AM, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Monday, June 29, 2020 11:35:55 AM MST Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > Is there any easy way to convert profiles from ifcfg-rh to > > > keyfile? > > > > I don't think that'd be a good idea. The

Re: Recent size increase when building library on Fedora 31 (maybe due to broken ELF notes, annobin?)

2019-11-26 Thread Thomas Haller
On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 12:00 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 11:54 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > > > when building libnm for Fedora 31, I noticed a recent increase in > > size. > > this seems to be the RHBZ: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho

Re: Recent size increase when building library on Fedora 31 (maybe due to broken ELF notes, annobin?)

2019-11-24 Thread Thomas Haller
On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 11:54 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > when building libnm for Fedora 31, I noticed a recent increase in > size. this seems to be the RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775885 best, Thomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed messag

Recent size increase when building library on Fedora 31 (maybe due to broken ELF notes, annobin?)

2019-11-24 Thread Thomas Haller
Hi, when building libnm for Fedora 31, I noticed a recent increase in size. It also happens locally when I use rpmbuild (or fedpkg local), but see for example the NetworkManager-libnm package on x86_64: [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1409043 [2]

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

2018-05-24 Thread Thomas Haller
On Thu, 2018-05-24 at 11:38 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 24.5.2018 11:27, Thomas Haller wrote: > > A sensible approach for a project to solve this problem is to write > > in > > a python2-and-3 compatible subset. But wbyen discouraging > > "#!/usr/bin/python"

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

2018-05-24 Thread Thomas Haller
On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 08:30 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 02:55:40PM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > > = Proposed System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate > > package = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Move_usr_bin_python_into_sep > > arate_package > >

Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds

2018-02-25 Thread Thomas Haller
Hi, On Sun, 2018-02-25 at 12:30 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 01:19:24PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > On 02/25/2018 12:45 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > What's our current take on using LTO for Fedora package builds? > > > systemd would

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Removing ldconfig scriptlets

2018-02-05 Thread Thomas Haller
On Sun, 2018-02-04 at 09:08 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Thomas Haller wrote: > > > now, building network-manager-applet(fc28) on Fedora 27, it fails: > > > > Full log written to /data/src/fedpkg/network-manager- > > applet/network- > > manager-applet-1.8.10/x86

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Removing ldconfig scriptlets

2018-02-04 Thread Thomas Haller
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 10:04 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > For those who didn't check Change page since today's morning: Thanks > to Jason > Tibbits (tibbs) who proposed %ldconfig_scriptlets macro and its > implementation. > > Now we have 4 macros you could use: %ldconfig, %ldconfig_post, >

Re: Proposal to remove NetworkManager from Core group

2018-01-19 Thread Thomas Haller
On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 10:02 +0100, David Demelier wrote: > On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 07:59 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > > the message doesn't give much motivation beside "can be avoided in > > many > > cases". I would be intrested in your exact criticism. &

Re: Proposal to remove NetworkManager from Core group

2018-01-18 Thread Thomas Haller
On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 09:28 +0100, David Demelier wrote: > Hello all, > > Since systemd-networkd is a mature network system daemon nowadays, > NetworkManager can be avoided in many cases where people do not need > desktop features. > > I propose to remove NetworkManager from the “Core” group and

Re: retiring git-annex

2017-05-29 Thread Thomas Haller
On Sun, 2017-05-28 at 17:39 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 04:00:32PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser > wrote: > > Am 27.05.2017 um 15:13 schrieb Jens-Ulrik Petersen: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I think we need to retire git-annex from Fedora (the current > > > version is very

NetworkManager's Metered property (was: Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage)

2016-11-01 Thread Thomas Haller
On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 12:31 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:23:06AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > For that matter, I'm fairly sure I've seen background update > > downloading happen when I was using an Android wifi tether > > connection. I'm pretty sure I

Re: Debugging NetworkManager-openvpn -- procedure?

2016-04-14 Thread Thomas Haller
On Thu, 2016-04-14 at 12:16 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Having a hard time with an OpenVPN network, where logs in journald > don't show anything of interest yet nm-openvpn quits. > > What is the right procedure to pass the --debug flag to nm-openvpn > these days (i.e.: F23/F24)? > >