It is some time ago it was fighting with polkit, but as far is I remember
you have to
make a .policy file to get pkexec to work right
Like this one I use in yumex.
https://github.com/timlau/yumex/blob/master/misc/dk.yumex.backend.policy.in
It should be installed in /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/
python3-cairo is a separate package, it contains the latest upstream
release 1.10.0
but it looks like the License is wrong in the .spec (License: MPLv1.1 or
LGPLv2)
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python3-cairo/sources/spec/
from upstream homepage
pycairo is licensed under the GNU Lesser
You can use GDbus as a replacement for python-dbus
You can see how I have done it in the yumdaemon python api.
https://github.com/timlau/yum-daemon/blob/master/client/yumdaemon/__init__.py
Same code is working unchanged in python 2 3
Tim
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Daniel J Walsh
I have made the first public release of yumdaemon a DBUS API for yum with
python 2 3 client bindings
It can be helpful for applications moving to python 3 but need to
performing yum actions.
future plans is to make the API work with dnf when there is an api to work
with.
API Docs :
Thanks
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:05 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com
tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
I have made the first public release of yumdaemon a DBUS API for yum with
python 2 3 client bindings
It can
Is there some reason that PyQt5 is not in Fedora or has it just not been
packaged yet ?
Tim
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Thanks Rex
Let me know if you need help for package reviews
I will be glad to help
Tim
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there some reason that PyQt5 is not in Fedora or has it just not been
packaged yet
the original urlgrabber maintainer left long time ago, but the yum team
adopted the code, because it was critical to yum, so this is cause why
there has been no upstream release.
yum shold make upstream releases in more frequently, instead of adding very
large patches to latest git HEAD.
yum-utils
Is DNF ready for prime time, the is no API at the moment, so it is not
possible to convert tool using the yum api to use a DNF api
I am working on a Python 3 version af yumex, there is package manager for
the XFCE spin, I have isolated all the yum actions in DBUS services, but
they will require
Hi Ales
How is the state of the Python API, I want to make a DBus API around it to
use with the nextgen Yumex
Like the one i have made for yum[1]
[1] : https://github.com/timlau/yum-daemon
Tim
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
dnf-0.4.2
vlc is not part of fedora, cause of patent related stuff, not a legal
expert, but I dont think fedora cant contain somethng there links to these
kind of applications
If you create a new kind of application metadata, would it not be a good
idea to start using the information we allready have in
AppData is focusing alot about application, what about content : icons,
themes, backgrounds
Tim
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:24:45 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
In GNOME Software, we show a list of applications for each
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote:
I was kinda hoping to just let that die a quiet death, but since this
thread has been thoroughly revived - I would've worded it differently if
I'd thought about it at all, and I'm sorry for that, it was a silly way
to
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just reviewed those pages, and it's certainly not obvious to me
how I would go about porting a PKLA file.
[libvirt Management Access]
Identity=unix-group:wheel
Action=org.libvirt.unix.manage
ResultAny=no
Did a quick scan and removed internals
random : ['import random : (cli.py)']
subprocess : ['from subprocess import Popen, PIPE :
(yum/packages.py)']
gettext : ['import gettext : (output.py)']
fnmatch : ['import fnmatch : (completion-helper.py)']
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/13/2012 09:50 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Yes, this was a misunderstanding. What is still supported is the .policy
files containing the default policy. And that is very good, since such
policy files are installed
Sound very strange, it is not some kind orphan package, there have been out
of Fedora and has to re-enter.
It it an active maintained package in F17, there just have not worked with
latest version for gnome-shell, because they change the way themes works in
every release.
It a waste of reviewers
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
No top-posting in fedora-devel :)
Sorry :)
Besides that, I can just agree with Tim. The oldest package was reviewed
less than a year ago, the two others last summer. Requiring a new review
is, well, somewhat formal.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:58 PM, David Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, 31 October, 2012 6:35:14 AM
Subject: Re:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Dario Lesca d.le...@solinos.it wrote:
On this Asus EeePC seashell series Notebook:
http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_e9f34fbb-dd9d-4b7d-8c77-027292c81297
After kernel update to 3.6.[12] (plus relative kmod-wl* module) the WiFi
stop work
I have found
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.comwrote:
So you make your system incompatible with every other Linux distro out
there, and with all existing documentation, but to what end? Tidyness?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jiri Eischmann eischm...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
the possibility of Software Center in Fedora has already been discussed
several times, last time a few month ago.
I read an article about a successful Google Summer of Code project [1]
whose goal was to make
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Henrique Junior henrique...@gmail.comwrote:
Currently several packages in epel6 are facing the problem that Fedora is
now systemd based and therefore many RPMs can not be created for EL6 and
EL5.
Can a maintainer use, lets say, two spec files (one for Fedora
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Rave it chat-to...@raveit.de wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
communicating and working together.
I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in
your future
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Damian Ivanov damianator...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello all,
awn has been orphaned in F17 because latest bzr fails to build
(0.4.1-XXX), though latest stable (0.4.0) builds fine. see
Would it not be better to work with yum upstream to make the current yum
depsolver more modular so you could plugin another libsolv based depsolver,
instead of making a fork of yum and starts trashing the current API. There
is a lot more to yum, that just solving dependencies. And making a fork
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:15 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:42 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com
tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Linux is about choices
No it isn't:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2008-January/msg00861.html
(I do
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
Hi,
I've been pointed to a news item about a (apparently the first) x86 (Atom)
based smartphone:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/14/orange-san-diego-review/
So even smartphones are going x86 now. It looks like x86
With a little sadless I has to orhan avant-windows-navigator,
awn-extras-applet and libdesktop-agnostic for fedora-devel (fedora-17)
The avant-windows-navigator package don't build in rawhide because of
changes in latest version of vala
The awn-extras-applet has lot of problems with gnome 2.x
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I know a lot of people wanted to have a discussion about this first,
but since we had the opportunity to
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
sochotni...@redhat.com wrote:
Excerpts from Richard Shaw's message of Thu Oct 06 22:17:51 +0200 2011:
After some initial interest there doesn't appear to be any activity
unless I'm missing something.
I am still interested. Anyone else?
* What if there are two layers of users that need to be rebuilt?
The delays just pile one upon another...
You can update rawhide at any time and accomplish that work without
delays. Then it shows up in the next Fedora version.
Yes, but then we have align the schedules, so have a new gnome
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Matthew Garrett wrote:
Debian policy is that any virtual dependencies must also have an
explicit dependency. In your case it would be something like
Requires: phonon-backend-gstreamer | phonon-backend
Unfortunately,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:13 PM, He Rui r...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 12:00 +, devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org
wrote:
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:15:15 +0800
From: He Rui r...@redhat.com
Subject: Package Review Needed
To: devel devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi
I have a number of packages under review, they should be very easy to review
712560 Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector -
extension for review change gnome-shell themes
712561 Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-atolm - the atolm gnome-shell theme
712562 Review Request:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
My only concern is that there be a command-line replacement available. I
currently fetch my ISOs with bittorrent-curses and screen. Can someone
with experience with any of them offer a recommendation? Python, C and
C++
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Ron Yorston wrote:
I'd prefer them to be in one package: they are intended to work
together.
Except the Shut Down menu extension directly conflicts with the
alternative-status-menu extension. Sub-packages are the
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 26.4.2011 18:23, Florian Festi napsal(a):
I think if anybody can come up with a exact description how they should
look like and how they should work and can create some evidence that
this is want we need and want
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.orgwrote:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 03:10:01PM -0400, Eric Mesa wrote:
I see. So what would I need to do to enable it? Recompile the
kernel?
Drop a file somewhere?
There may be a kmod for it in rpmfusion? If not
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.comwrote:
Hello everyone,
As I'm new to the community and RPM Package Review (and development), I
figured a tool to assist with reviews would be a nice time saver.
With that said I have a simple Python tool (still in early
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:42 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com
tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
The following have been orphaned by leigh123linux. Sending on his
behalf since his is not subscribed to this list
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
The following have been orphaned by leigh123linux. Sending on his
behalf since his is not subscribed to this list
libdesktop-agnostic, avant-window-navigator, awn-applets-extras,
gmixer, torium and html2text
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been working on packaging lcd4linux (to use together with the digital
picture frames I also wrote a libgphoto driver for a while ago).
The packaging is complete and now I'm looking for reviewers for the
43 matches
Mail list logo
