On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 09:49 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 28.7.2015 v 18:15 Matthias Clasen napsal(a):
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 14:49 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Just out of curiosity, do you have already any candidates for
File
Triggers? I suppose /sbin/ldconfig is one of them. Do you
On 08/05/2015 10:02 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
As a test balloon, I've now added file triggers to gdk-pixbuf2-2.31.5
-2.fc24, and librsvg2-2.40.9-3.fc24 now relies on them to get its
pixbuf loader registered.
Let me know if you see any problems with those updates that might be
caused by
On Saturday, 25 July 2015 at 13:31, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 25/07/2015 13:20, Florian Festi a écrit :
On 07/25/2015 11:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Thanks for catching that!
Do you want me to file a bug ?
Yes, please!
FYI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246743
It
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:16:57PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Saturday, 25 July 2015 at 13:31, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 25/07/2015 13:20, Florian Festi a écrit :
On 07/25/2015 11:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Thanks for catching that!
Do you want me to file a bug
Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com
wrote:
Also we still need to settle to a final syntax for the operators
[1]. Unfortunately there is no consensus among the other packaging
formats what to use. Right now rpm accepts 3 different styles:
*
Florian Festi wrote:
Also we still need to settle to a final syntax for the operators [1].
Unfortunately there is no consensus among the other packaging formats
what to use. Right now rpm accepts 3 different styles:
* AND OR IF ELSE
* | ? :
* || ? :
But the final release will only
Michael Schroeder wrote:
And there's IF and THEN/ELSE. IF is a postfix op, like in perl
and ruby:
Requires: a IF b
There's no ELSE part in this variant?
THEN/ELSE is the infix one:
Requires: b THEN a
Requires: b ? a
Requires: b THEN a ELSE c
Requires: b ? a : c
THEN without IF is
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 09:08:07 + (UTC)
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2015-07-24, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com wrote:
The freshly released rpm-4.12.90 aka rpm-4.13.0-alpha is going to
hit rawhide soon. The two major new features are:
Will you rebuild all librpm.so.3's reverse
On 2015-07-28, Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de wrote:
And there's IF and THEN/ELSE. IF is a postfix op, like in perl
and ruby:
Requires: a IF b
THEN/ELSE is the infix one:
Requires: b THEN a
Requires: b ? a
Requires: b THEN a ELSE c
Requires: b ? a : c
When I read the documentation I
On 2015-07-24, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com wrote:
The freshly released rpm-4.12.90 aka rpm-4.13.0-alpha is going to hit
rawhide soon. The two major new features are:
Will you rebuild all librpm.so.3's reverse dependencies? I've already
rebuild Perl packages, but there some remaining:
# dnf
On 07/28/2015 11:37 AM, Florian Festi wrote:
On 07/28/2015 09:43 AM, Lubos Kardos wrote:
Support in rpm is not enough but libsolv supports rich deps since the version
0.6.9 too thus rich deps work also in hawkey and dnf if the version 0.6.9 or
a newer version of libsolv is installed.
Right
Dne 28.7.2015 v 18:15 Matthias Clasen napsal(a):
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 14:49 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Just out of curiosity, do you have already any candidates for File
Triggers? I suppose /sbin/ldconfig is one of them. Do you plan to
have some F24 feature to get rid of these?
Here is a
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote:
From C-style operators I would prefer single-character ones for two reasons:
1) Two-character operators may suggest short-circuit evaluation -
Requires: foo || bar can be misunderstood as require foo, or bar if
and
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/28/2015 11:37 AM, Florian Festi wrote:
Also we still need to settle to a final syntax for the operators [1].
Unfortunately there is no consensus among the other packaging formats
what to use. Right now rpm
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:08:52AM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
I think that C-style operators (, ) are better than verbose
COBOL-style ones because they are consistent with relation operators (,
= and so on) already used by rpm. Secondly, they don't introduce
conflict with existing meaning
On 07/29/2015 11:08 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
From C-style operators I would prefer single-character ones for two reasons:
1) Two-character operators may suggest short-circuit evaluation -
Requires: foo || bar can be misunderstood as require foo, or bar if
and only if foo is not available,
@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 5:36:45 PM
Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] rpm-4.12.90 in rawhide
Dne 24.7.2015 v 15:49 Florian Festi napsal(a):
* Boolean (aka rich) dependencies to support more complicated relation
between packages
Is this supported by dnf/hawkey/libsolv already or just
On 07/28/2015 09:43 AM, Lubos Kardos wrote:
Support in rpm is not enough but libsolv supports rich deps since the version
0.6.9 too thus rich deps work also in hawkey and dnf if the version 0.6.9 or
a newer version of libsolv is installed.
Right now only AND and OR is supported by libsolv.
On 07/28/2015 02:49 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Just out of curiosity, do you have already any candidates for File
Triggers? I suppose /sbin/ldconfig is one of them. Do you plan to have
some F24 feature to get rid of these?
Well, we do not yet have concrete plans with which scriptlets to start.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 07:37:05AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com wrote:
Unfortunately there is no consensus among the other packaging formats
what to use. Right now rpm accepts 3 different styles:
* AND OR IF ELSE
* | ? :
*
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/28/2015 09:43 AM, Lubos Kardos wrote:
Support in rpm is not enough but libsolv supports rich deps since the
version
0.6.9 too thus rich deps work also in hawkey and dnf if the version
0.6.9 or
a newer version
Dne 28.7.2015 v 13:37 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com
mailto:ffe...@redhat.comwrote:
On 07/28/2015 09:43 AM, Lubos Kardos wrote:
Support in rpm is not enough but libsolv supports rich deps
since the version
0.6.9 too
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 14:49 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Just out of curiosity, do you have already any candidates for File
Triggers? I suppose /sbin/ldconfig is one of them. Do you plan to
have some F24 feature to get rid of these?
Here is a list of candidates:
On 07/26/2015 08:18 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 13:31:45 +0200
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote:
Le 25/07/2015 13:20, Florian Festi a écrit :
On 07/25/2015 11:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Thanks for catching that!
Do you want me to file a bug ?
Yes, please!
FYI
We fixed this problem in rawhide in rpm-4.12.90-2.fc24
Lubos
- Original Message -
From: Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2015 11:18:05 AM
Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] rpm-4.12.90 in rawhide
Le 24/07/2015 15:49, Florian
On 07/25/2015 11:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 24/07/2015 15:49, Florian Festi a écrit :
The freshly released rpm-4.12.90 aka rpm-4.13.0-alpha is going to hit
rawhide soon. The two major new features are:
* Boolean (aka rich) dependencies to support more complicated relation
between packages
On 07/25/2015 11:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
%doc imagick-3.1.2/{CREDITS,TODO,INSTALL}
To give a bit more context:
Globs with braces have not been supported in rpm's %files section ever.
But https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728959 caused all kind
of docs file being added to the
Kluknavsky fkluk...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 3:55:53 PM
Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] rpm-4.12.90 in rawhide
On 07/25/2015 11:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 24/07/2015 15:49, Florian Festi a écrit :
The freshly released rpm-4.12.90 aka rpm-4.13.0
On 07/27/2015 04:55 PM, Lubos Kardos wrote:
The current behavior is right. Your install script insert files into buildroot
and these files are not listed in %files section.
Correctly you should replace this:
%files
%doc AUTHORS COPYING NEWS README
...
with this:
%files
Dne 24.7.2015 v 15:49 Florian Festi napsal(a):
* Boolean (aka rich) dependencies to support more complicated relation
between packages
Is this supported by dnf/hawkey/libsolv already or just RPM support is
enough?
Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 13:31:45 +0200
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote:
Le 25/07/2015 13:20, Florian Festi a écrit :
On 07/25/2015 11:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Thanks for catching that!
Do you want me to file a bug ?
Yes, please!
FYI
Le 24/07/2015 15:49, Florian Festi a écrit :
The freshly released rpm-4.12.90 aka rpm-4.13.0-alpha is going to hit
rawhide soon. The two major new features are:
* Boolean (aka rich) dependencies to support more complicated relation
between packages
* File Triggers - run scripts if files
On 07/25/2015 11:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 24/07/2015 15:49, Florian Festi a écrit :
The freshly released rpm-4.12.90 aka rpm-4.13.0-alpha is going to hit
rawhide soon. The two major new features are:
* Boolean (aka rich) dependencies to support more complicated relation
between packages
Le 25/07/2015 13:20, Florian Festi a écrit :
On 07/25/2015 11:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Thanks for catching that!
Do you want me to file a bug ?
Yes, please!
FYI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246743
Remi
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com wrote:
See the draft release notes for details: http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.13.0
Terminate builds on empty files (?_empty_manifest_terminate_build)
That should probably read on empty manifest files.
Anyway, one effect of
The freshly released rpm-4.12.90 aka rpm-4.13.0-alpha is going to hit
rawhide soon. The two major new features are:
* Boolean (aka rich) dependencies to support more complicated relation
between packages
* File Triggers - run scripts if files get installed in given paths -
possibly to replace
36 matches
Mail list logo
