On Sat, Jan 30, 2021, at 1:54 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 30.01.2021 18:50, clime wrote:
> > Hey, what do you mean by this?
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/alternatives/
>
> > Why should scriplets usage be incompatible with immutable Fedora
> > releases?
>
Thank you, Vitaly and Fabio!
That makes sense, I didn't look on the issue from new user's view. Most
people who use vi/vim are aware of the differences and wanted vi/vim
just work if the other is not installed, so vi/vim are drop-in
replacements for them in this matter of speaking. And Vi is just
> Am 30.01.2021 um 19:41 schrieb Fabio Valentini :
>
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 7:24 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am 30.01.2021 um 17:45 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
>>> :
>>>
>>> On 30.01.2021 16:58, Peter Boy wrote:
But it’s perfectly usable for Fedora Workstation or Server
On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 at 20:03, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 30.01.2021 18:50, clime wrote:
> > Hey, what do you mean by this?
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/alternatives/
>
> > Why should scriplets usage be incompatible with immutable Fedora
> > releases?
>
>
On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 at 19:48, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 7:24 PM Peter Boy wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Am 30.01.2021 um 17:45 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > > :
> > >
> > > On 30.01.2021 16:58, Peter Boy wrote:
> > >> But it’s perfectly usable for Fedora Workstation
On 30.01.2021 18:50, clime wrote:
Hey, what do you mean by this?
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/alternatives/
Why should scriplets usage be incompatible with immutable Fedora
releases?
rpm-ostree doesn't execute any scriptlets.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev
On 30.01.2021 19:24, Peter Boy wrote:
Thanks for the info. Unfortunately, I don’t see a connection to immutable
Fedora (it is about drop-in, user configurable, etc). Or do I miss something?
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/alternatives/
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 7:24 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 30.01.2021 um 17:45 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > :
> >
> > On 30.01.2021 16:58, Peter Boy wrote:
> >> But it’s perfectly usable for Fedora Workstation or Server and almost
> >> indispensable for some development projects,
> Am 30.01.2021 um 17:45 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> :
>
> On 30.01.2021 16:58, Peter Boy wrote:
>> But it’s perfectly usable for Fedora Workstation or Server and almost
>> indispensable for some development projects, e.g. Java (and vi/vim for a
>> terminal environment). Why should
On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 at 16:08, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 29.01.2021 09:49, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> > I'm currently trying to rewrite the current shell aliases for making
> > Vi/View/Vim use the correct compiled binary based on which Vim package
> > is installed.
>
> Alternatives are
On 30.01.2021 16:58, Peter Boy wrote:
But it’s perfectly usable for Fedora Workstation or Server and almost
indispensable for some development projects, e.g. Java (and vi/vim for a
terminal environment). Why should alternatives not be usable there? Or what is
a suitable and adequate
> Am 30.01.2021 um 15:58 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> :
>
> On 29.01.2021 09:49, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>> I'm currently trying to rewrite the current shell aliases for making
>> Vi/View/Vim use the correct compiled binary based on which Vim package
>> is installed.
>
> Alternatives are
On 29.01.2021 09:49, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
I'm currently trying to rewrite the current shell aliases for making
Vi/View/Vim use the correct compiled binary based on which Vim package
is installed.
Alternatives are not suitable for Fedora, because they will break
immutable Fedora releases due
Hi all,
I'm currently trying to rewrite the current shell aliases for making
Vi/View/Vim use the correct compiled binary based on which Vim package
is installed. The current aliases have several downsides (don't work
with sudo, runs in subshell) so I got a recommendation for
'alternatives' which
14 matches
Mail list logo