On 26. 11. 19 13:13, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
* Anitya integration in dist-git
Something we lost when loosing pkgdb was the easy integration to anitya
(https://release-monitoring.org). With the coming changes we are getting them
back.
On the left hand-side column, there will be a drop-down
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 06:41:35AM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>Hi
>On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:43 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
><[1]pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote:
>
> `Monitoring` means: you get a bugzilla ticket
> `Monitoring and scrach builds` means: you get the bugzilla ticket and
Hi
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:43 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
>
> `Monitoring` means: you get a bugzilla ticket
> `Monitoring and scrach builds` means: you get the bugzilla ticket and an
> attempt to do a scratch build for the new version
>
I was wondering how hard it would be to open a
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 02:51:57PM +0100, Jun Aruga wrote:
> > > 2. Is it possible to put a link of a package's Antiya project page
> > > around "Monitoring status" of the rpm/foo page?
> > > It looks useful to know and edit the setting easily.
> > >
> > > For example. rpms/ruby
> > 2. Is it possible to put a link of a package's Antiya project page
> > around "Monitoring status" of the rpm/foo page?
> > It looks useful to know and edit the setting easily.
> >
> > For example. rpms/ruby https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby
> > =>
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 05:15:36PM +0100, Jun Aruga wrote:
> > Existing status will be migrated from the fedora-scm-requests repo on
> > pagure to
> use this drop-down.
> > Using the fedora-scm-requests repo for the anitya integration will no
> > longer be
> supported.
>
> Thank you for the
> Existing status will be migrated from the fedora-scm-requests repo on pagure
> to
use this drop-down.
> Using the fedora-scm-requests repo for the anitya integration will no longer
> be
supported.
Thank you for the anitya integration feature.
I have 2 questions. After the migration will be
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 3:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 02:25:08PM +, Mat Booth wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 07:32, Igor Gnatenko <
> > ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Because it is really hard to run two systems at the same time and keep
> >
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 02:25:08PM +, Mat Booth wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 07:32, Igor Gnatenko <
> ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > Because it is really hard to run two systems at the same time and keep
> them synced?
>
> Then let me rephrase. IMO the replacement system
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 07:32, Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Because it is really hard to run two systems at the same time and keep
them synced?
Then let me rephrase. IMO the replacement system shouldn't have been
commissioned into production before it reached
Because it is really hard to run two systems at the same time and keep them
synced?
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019, 14:43 Mat Booth wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 17:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> >
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > Tomorrow we are planning on deploying a new version of pagure and
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 17:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> Tomorrow we are planning on deploying a new version of pagure and
> pagure-dist-git on production.
Great stuff. I still don't understand why pkgdb was allowed to go away
before the replacements reached
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:56 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 05:26:40PM +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> >
>
> Seconded!
Thirded! Or more like fifthed, actually. This is great.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 05:26:40PM +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
>
Seconded!
Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
- Original Message -
> From: "Pierre-Yves Chibon"
> To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 1:13:45 PM
> Subject: Announcing new anitya integration and de-orphaning process
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> Tomorrow
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:22 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> Tomorrow we are planning on deploying a new version of pagure and
> pagure-dist-git on production.
>
> These changes come with two changes to the packager workflow:
>
> * Anitya integration in dist-git
>
>
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, November 26, 2019 6:13 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> Good
Good Morning Everyone,
Tomorrow we are planning on deploying a new version of pagure and
pagure-dist-git on production.
These changes come with two changes to the packager workflow:
* Anitya integration in dist-git
Something we lost when loosing pkgdb was the easy integration to anitya
Good Morning Everyone,
Tomorrow we are planning on deploying a new version of pagure and
pagure-dist-git on production.
These changes come with two changes to the packager workflow:
* Anitya integration in dist-git
Something we lost when loosing pkgdb was the easy integration to anitya
19 matches
Mail list logo
