Le 2018-02-20 19:51, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :
"NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes:
NM> BTW dovecot is broken by all the compiler and crypto changes, both
NM> for the two last rebuilds (that failed) and the build before (that
NM> succeeded but has broken auth
> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes:
NM> BTW dovecot is broken by all the compiler and crypto changes, both
NM> for the two last rebuilds (that failed) and the build before (that
NM> succeeded but has broken auth which is sort of needed for an imap
NM> server)
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 22:57 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 21:51 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:50:10PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > Well, true, but then just like every year, we'll wind up doing
> > > > a lot of
> > > > the spadework
BTW dovecot is broken by all the compiler and crypto changes, both for the
two last rebuilds (that failed) and the build before (that succeeded but
has broken auth which is sort of needed for an imap server)
--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
devel mailing list --
On Feb 20, 2018 08:54, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 22:57 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 21:51 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:50:10PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > Well, true, but then just
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 22:57 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 21:51 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:50:10PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > Well, true, but then just like every year, we'll wind up doing a lot of
> > > > the spadework of fixing
On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 21:51 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:50:10PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > Well, true, but then just like every year, we'll wind up doing a lot of
> > > the spadework of fixing things to build with the new GCC. And probably
> > > at first
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:50:10PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Well, true, but then just like every year, we'll wind up doing a lot of
> > the spadework of fixing things to build with the new GCC. And probably
> > at first some critical things will fail to build and that'll mess up
> > the
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 12:58 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 18:45 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:39:41AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > The timing on this looks a bit awkward when compared with the current
> > >
On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 18:45 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:39:41AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > The timing on this looks a bit awkward when compared with the current
> > schedule, which has the Beta going out in March and Final early in May:
> >
> >
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:39:41AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The timing on this looks a bit awkward when compared with the current
> schedule, which has the Beta going out in March and Final early in May:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/Schedule
>
> That would appear to mean
On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 12:11 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = System Wide Change: GCC8 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC8
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Jakub Jelínek
>
> Switch GCC in Fedora 28 to 8.x.y, rebuild all packages with it, or
> optionally rebuild just some packages with it and
= System Wide Change: GCC8 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC8
Change owner(s):
* Jakub Jelínek
Switch GCC in Fedora 28 to 8.x.y, rebuild all packages with it, or
optionally rebuild just some packages with it and rebuild all packages
only in Fedora 29.
== Detailed Description ==
GCC
13 matches
Mail list logo