On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 14:12 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 08/22/2018 04:28 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffe
> > doraproject.org%2Fwiki%2FChanges%2FRemove_Group_Tagdata=02%7C0
> >
Dne 22.8.2018 v 22:41 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> Can we patch rpm not to show this useless line?
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/534
Miroslav
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On 08/24/2018 09:12 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 08/22/2018 04:28 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
On 08/22/2018 04:28 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 04:13:50PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
>
> ZJ> Can we patch rpm not to show this useless line?
>
> In the context of what I wrote, there's no "useless line". I assume
> you're talking about rpm -qi output, but I
On 23.8.2018 00:31, Artur Iwicki wrote:
If we remove the Group: tag from existing packages (assuming 100% accuracy),
this would mean that the only way for a package to have the Group: tag would be
to:
a) have a maintainer add it back in
b) accept a new package with the Group: tag present
If
On 08/23/2018 12:31 AM, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> If we remove the Group: tag from existing packages (assuming 100% accuracy),
> this would mean that the only way for a package to have the Group: tag would
> be to:
> a) have a maintainer add it back in
> b) accept a new package with the Group: tag
If we remove the Group: tag from existing packages (assuming 100% accuracy),
this would mean that the only way for a package to have the Group: tag would be
to:
a) have a maintainer add it back in
b) accept a new package with the Group: tag present
If we assume option a) to be unlikely, then
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 6:00 PM Omair Majid wrote:
>
> * Ben Cotton [2018-08-22 16:38]:
> > 9420 source packages (43% of the total count) come closer to
> > compliance with Fedora's packaging guidelines. The Group: tag has
> > been in a "should not use" state since March of 2017.
>
> Can
> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
ZJ> Can we patch rpm not to show this useless line?
In the context of what I wrote, there's no "useless line". I assume
you're talking about rpm -qi output, but I was being more general than
that. Certainly we wouldn't patch out the GROUP
* Ben Cotton [2018-08-22 16:38]:
> 9420 source packages (43% of the total count) come closer to
> compliance with Fedora's packaging guidelines. The Group: tag has
> been in a "should not use" state since March of 2017.
Can rpmlint be patched to warn about using the 'Group:' tag?
Omair
--
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Group_Tag
== Summary ==
Remove the Group: tag from over 9000 source packages.
== Owner ==
* Name: Jason Tibbitts (tibbs)
* Email: ti...@math.uh.edu
== Detailed Description ==
I will remove the Group: tag from all specfiles in Fedora dist-git
which
On 08/22/2018 01:28 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Group_Tag
>
> == Summary ==
> Remove the Group: tag from over 9000 source packages.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: Jason Tibbitts (tibbs)
> * Email: ti...@math.uh.edu
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> I will
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 04:28:16PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Group_Tag
>
> == Summary ==
> Remove the Group: tag from over 9000 source packages.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: Jason Tibbitts (tibbs)
> * Email: ti...@math.uh.edu
>
> == Detailed
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Group_Tag
== Summary ==
Remove the Group: tag from over 9000 source packages.
== Owner ==
* Name: Jason Tibbitts (tibbs)
* Email: ti...@math.uh.edu
== Detailed Description ==
I will remove the Group: tag from all specfiles in Fedora dist-git
which
15 matches
Mail list logo
