On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 02:00:22PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 11:12 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> > Dne 27. 06. 19 v 23:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > > (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting
> > packages or '--skip-broken' to
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 11:12 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 27. 06. 19 v 23:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting
> packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
>
> This is message for people who are
Dne 27. 06. 19 v 23:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages
> or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
This is message for people who are willing/are able to fix or report things.
For regular user this
Dne 27. 06. 19 v 23:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:37:28AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Default_Best
> I wanted to update today, and I got the following report:
> $ sudo dnf upgrade --best
> Last metadata expiration
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:35 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2019-06-27, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Default_Best
> >
> >== Summary ==
> > Currently, DNF prefers clean dependency resolution over package
> > updates; a package (almost) silently won't get updated
On 2019-06-27, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Default_Best
>
>== Summary ==
> Currently, DNF prefers clean dependency resolution over package
> updates; a package (almost) silently won't get updated to a newer
> version if the new version has dependency problems.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:37:28AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Default_Best
I wanted to update today, and I got the following report:
$ sudo dnf upgrade --best
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:18 ago on Thu 27 Jun 2019 10:45:00 PM CEST.
Error:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:25 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Default_Best
>
> == Summary ==
> Currently, DNF prefers clean dependency resolution over package updates;
> a package (almost) silently won't get updated to a newer version if the new
> version has
* Björn Persson:
> If I understand this change correctly, then:
>
> · Before: If one package update is uninstallable, then that package
> won't be updated, but other packages can still be updated.
>
> · After: If one package update is uninstallable, then *nothing* will be
> updated.
>
> And you
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:30 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> If there is a significant risk that the warning will be overlooked,
> then how about just making the warning more visible?
>
>
Based on experience with people installing things from CPAN for Perl, there
is no "more visible" that has any
If I understand this change correctly, then:
· Before: If one package update is uninstallable, then that package
won't be updated, but other packages can still be updated.
· After: If one package update is uninstallable, then *nothing* will be
updated.
And you call that an improvement?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Default_Best
== Summary ==
Currently, DNF prefers clean dependency resolution over package updates;
a package (almost) silently won't get updated to a newer version if the new
version has dependency problems. DNF will be changed to prefer updates and
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Default_Best
== Summary ==
Currently, DNF prefers clean dependency resolution over package updates;
a package (almost) silently won't get updated to a newer version if the new
version has dependency problems. DNF will be changed to prefer updates and
13 matches
Mail list logo
