Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 11:03 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
>> Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>> Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
>>> converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
>>
>> Maybe I'll try that next
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:12 PM Raphael Groner wrote:
>
> > On vendredi 28 septembre 2018 14:02:37 CEST Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >
> > This is fancy and all, but could we have back a table of contents like in
> > the
> > Wiki. Some pages, like the main packaging one are very long and sometimes we
>
> On vendredi 28 septembre 2018 14:02:37 CEST Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>
> This is fancy and all, but could we have back a table of contents like in the
> Wiki. Some pages, like the main packaging one are very long and sometimes we
> need to look a specific section fast instead of scrolling to find
On vendredi 28 septembre 2018 14:02:37 CEST Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
> If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to
> open ticket or submit pull request for packaging committee
Hi,
The question is not about code higlighting but rendering, so when you look
> at an
> .adoc file it looks like what it would look once transformed into html.
> Just like, when you are looking at a readme.md, you don't see the markdown
> syntax (unless you specifically ask for it).
>
For this
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 05:58:57PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:00 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:02 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Dne 2.10.2018 v 13:11 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> > > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:53:45AM
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 10:37 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 2.10.2018 v 18:59 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 11:59 AM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:00 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:02 AM Vít Ondruch
> wrote:
>
>
>
Dne 2.10.2018 v 18:59 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 11:59 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:00 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:02 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 2.10.2018 v 13:11 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> On Tue, Oct
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 11:59 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:00 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:02 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Dne 2.10.2018 v 13:11 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> > > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:53:45AM +0200, Vít
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:00 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:02 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Dne 2.10.2018 v 13:11 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:53:45AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Dne 1.10.2018 v 20:00 Jason L Tibbitts III
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:02 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
>
> Dne 2.10.2018 v 13:11 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:53:45AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 1.10.2018 v 20:00 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a):
> "BP" == Björn Persson writes:
> >>> BP> This
> "AS" == Ankur Sinha writes:
AS> For example, maybe [1] should link to [2], since I expect the
AS> sponsorship process falls under the FPC's scope?
It does not.
- J<
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 03:01:34PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 2.10.2018 v 13:11 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:53:45AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 1.10.2018 v 20:00 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a):
> "BP" == Björn Persson writes:
> >>>
Dne 2.10.2018 v 13:11 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:53:45AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> Dne 1.10.2018 v 20:00 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a):
"BP" == Björn Persson writes:
>>> BP> This was on Fedora 27. So one needs Fedora 28 to help fixing the
>>> BP>
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 14:51:55 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:47:37AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > "AS" == Ankur Sinha writes:
> >
> > AS> Thank you---that's really neat! Would other relatively static pages
> > AS> such as these also be
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:53:45AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 1.10.2018 v 20:00 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a):
> >> "BP" == Björn Persson writes:
> > BP> This was on Fedora 27. So one needs Fedora 28 to help fixing the
> > BP> formatting of the guidelines then? (Once that other
Dne 1.10.2018 v 20:00 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a):
>> "BP" == Björn Persson writes:
> BP> This was on Fedora 27. So one needs Fedora 28 to help fixing the
> BP> formatting of the guidelines then? (Once that other breakage is
> BP> fixed I suppose?)
>
> I believe one could build the
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 11:03 PM Björn Persson wrote:
> Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
> > converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
>
> Maybe I'll try that next time I have some free time. This is
On 1.10.2018 23:38, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:03 PM Björn Persson wrote:
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
Maybe I'll try that next time I
> "JF" == John Florian writes:
JF> I would agree with that, but I read the announcement as if this
JF> *was* finished.
The announcement was unfortunately made before things were in what I
would consider to be a "releasable" condition. Currently the Wiki pages
continue to exist and have not
> "NG" == Neal Gompa writes:
NG> I'm wondering if it was a good idea to use asciidoc in the first
NG> place. Unlike reStructuredText, asciidoc implementations seem to be
NG> in very poor shape.
It's what the documentation team has chosen. I don't think the
packaging committee would want to
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:03 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
> > converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
>
> Maybe I'll try that next time I have some free time. This is
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 11:02:13PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> > Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
> > converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
> Maybe I'll try that next time I have some free time. This is giving me
> a "best
On 2018-10-01 17:04, Björn Persson wrote:
John Florian wrote:
And conversely, shouldn't
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines be telling viewers
they now need to go to docs.fp.o?
Not until the conversion is finished, in my opinion.
I would agree with that, but I read the
John Florian wrote:
> And conversely, shouldn't
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines be telling viewers
> they now need to go to docs.fp.o?
Not until the conversion is finished, in my opinion.
Björn Persson
pgpChXjsJJFLd.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:22 PM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
> Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
> converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
FWIW, We *could* use the asciidoctor / asciidoc plugin for jekyll.
Both asciidoctor and
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
> converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
Maybe I'll try that next time I have some free time. This is giving me
a "best viewed with Netscape Navigator" feeling
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 03:59:21PM -0400, John Florian wrote:
> On 2018-10-01 10:51, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >I think we instead should make sure that all docs under docs.fp.o
> And conversely, shouldn't
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines be telling
> viewers they
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 16:27, Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
> If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to
> open ticket or submit pull request for
On 2018-10-01 10:51, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
I think we instead should make sure that all docs under docs.fp.o
contain good links to those pages on the wiki.
And conversely, shouldn't
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines be telling viewers
they now need to go to
Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
- J<
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 1.10.2018 20:00, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"BP" == Björn Persson writes:
BP> This was on Fedora 27. So one needs Fedora 28 to help fixing the
BP> formatting of the guidelines then? (Once that other breakage is
BP> fixed I suppose?)
I believe one could build the antora stack from scratch
> "BP" == Björn Persson writes:
BP> This was on Fedora 27. So one needs Fedora 28 to help fixing the
BP> formatting of the guidelines then? (Once that other breakage is
BP> fixed I suppose?)
I believe one could build the antora stack from scratch instead of using
a container. I would hope
Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Seems that podman is broken (it is also broken for tibbs in some other
> way), this is really sad. Just wondering which version of fedora you are
> running and is there really no package called "slirp4netns" (I can see it
> in F28/F29/F30).
This was on Fedora 27. So one
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:47:37AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "AS" == Ankur Sinha writes:
>
> AS> Thank you---that's really neat! Would other relatively static pages
> AS> such as these also be migrated?
>
> Those are outside the scope of the packaging committee. They could
>
> "AS" == Ankur Sinha writes:
AS> Thank you---that's really neat! Would other relatively static pages
AS> such as these also be migrated?
Those are outside the scope of the packaging committee. They could
certainly be migrated in a similar fashion, but they wouldn't live in
the packaging
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 10:24 PM Björn Persson wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
> > > If you find any error or would like to change something,
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
> > If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to
> > open ticket or submit pull request for
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 14:02:37 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hello everyone,
Hello,
> We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
> If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to
> open
> ticket or submit pull request for packaging committee
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
…
> I already said that before: I don't think we can tell packagers to use the
> new guidelines page until the majority of formatting and content issues is
> fixed.
The new layout looks more user-friendly to me and could attract
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
> If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to
> open ticket or submit pull request for packaging committee
I concur the landing page font is large.
I recommend that the link emoji icon utilized in "Fedora Budget" and "Fedora's
Otreachy Docs" is replaces with an image. It differs from platform to platform.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, September 28, 2018 4:00 PM, Richard Shaw
wrote:
>
Looks a touch on the big side fonts wise but looks really nice overall.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
> If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to
> open ticket or submit pull request for packaging committee repo[1].
This is amazing!
Hello everyone,
We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to
open ticket or submit pull request for packaging committee repo[1].
Thanks for attention!
[0]
Hello everyone,
We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to
open ticket or submit pull request for packaging committee repo[1].
Thanks for attention!
[0]
46 matches
Mail list logo
