Re: Fedora TPM1.2 Support

2020-12-04 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:08 PM Jerry Snitselaar wrote: > > We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the > question with regards to opencryptoki-tpmtok if it should be changed in > Fedora as well, so I thought I'd see what everyone thinks about future > TPM1.2 support in

Re: Fedora TPM1.2 Support

2020-12-04 Thread Jerry Snitselaar
Jerry Snitselaar @ 2020-12-04 11:59 MST: > Simo Sorce @ 2020-12-04 07:32 MST: > >> On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 14:08 +, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:04 PM Simo Sorce wrote: >>> > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 21:25 +, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> > > > We are looking to no longer

Re: Fedora TPM1.2 Support

2020-12-04 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 11:59 -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: > Simo Sorce @ 2020-12-04 07:32 MST: > > > On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 14:08 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:04 PM Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 21:25 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > > We

Re: Fedora TPM1.2 Support

2020-12-04 Thread Jerry Snitselaar
Simo Sorce @ 2020-12-04 07:32 MST: > On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 14:08 +, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:04 PM Simo Sorce wrote: >> > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 21:25 +, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > > > We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the >> > > >

Re: Fedora TPM1.2 Support

2020-12-04 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:32 PM Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 14:08 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:04 PM Simo Sorce wrote: > > > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 21:25 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than

Re: Fedora TPM1.2 Support

2020-12-04 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 14:08 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:04 PM Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 21:25 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the > > > > question with regards to

Re: Fedora TPM1.2 Support

2020-12-04 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:04 PM Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 21:25 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the > > > question with regards to opencryptoki-tpmtok if it should be changed in > > > Fedora as well, so I thought

Re: Fedora TPM1.2 Support

2020-12-04 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 21:25 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the > > question with regards to opencryptoki-tpmtok if it should be changed in > > Fedora as well, so I thought I'd see what everyone thinks about future > > TPM1.2

Re: Fedora TPM1.2 Support

2020-12-03 Thread Jerry Snitselaar
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:28 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the > > question with regards to opencryptoki-tpmtok if it should be changed in > > Fedora as well, so I thought I'd see what everyone thinks about future > > TPM1.2 support

Re: Fedora TPM1.2 Support

2020-12-03 Thread Peter Robinson
> We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the > question with regards to opencryptoki-tpmtok if it should be changed in > Fedora as well, so I thought I'd see what everyone thinks about future > TPM1.2 support in Fedora. I know at one point in the last year or so >

Fedora TPM1.2 Support

2020-12-02 Thread Jerry Snitselaar
We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the question with regards to opencryptoki-tpmtok if it should be changed in Fedora as well, so I thought I'd see what everyone thinks about future TPM1.2 support in Fedora. I know at one point in the last year or so trousers almost