On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:08 PM Jerry Snitselaar
wrote:
>
> We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the
> question with regards to opencryptoki-tpmtok if it should be changed in
> Fedora as well, so I thought I'd see what everyone thinks about future
> TPM1.2 support in
Jerry Snitselaar @ 2020-12-04 11:59 MST:
> Simo Sorce @ 2020-12-04 07:32 MST:
>
>> On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 14:08 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:04 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 21:25 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> > > > We are looking to no longer
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 11:59 -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> Simo Sorce @ 2020-12-04 07:32 MST:
>
> > On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 14:08 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:04 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 21:25 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > > > We
Simo Sorce @ 2020-12-04 07:32 MST:
> On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 14:08 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:04 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 21:25 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > > > We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the
>> > > >
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:32 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 14:08 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:04 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 21:25 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > > We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 14:08 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:04 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 21:25 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the
> > > > question with regards to
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:04 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 21:25 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the
> > > question with regards to opencryptoki-tpmtok if it should be changed in
> > > Fedora as well, so I thought
On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 21:25 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the
> > question with regards to opencryptoki-tpmtok if it should be changed in
> > Fedora as well, so I thought I'd see what everyone thinks about future
> > TPM1.2
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:28 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the
> > question with regards to opencryptoki-tpmtok if it should be changed in
> > Fedora as well, so I thought I'd see what everyone thinks about future
> > TPM1.2 support
> We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the
> question with regards to opencryptoki-tpmtok if it should be changed in
> Fedora as well, so I thought I'd see what everyone thinks about future
> TPM1.2 support in Fedora. I know at one point in the last year or so
>
We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the
question with regards to opencryptoki-tpmtok if it should be changed in
Fedora as well, so I thought I'd see what everyone thinks about future
TPM1.2 support in Fedora. I know at one point in the last year or so
trousers almost
11 matches
Mail list logo