Re: Heads up: LLVM repackaging in F24

2016-01-29 Thread Dave Johansen
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > LLVM upstream is (eventually) dropping their autotools build system in > favor of their cmake buildsystem. This wouldn't normally be something > you'd notice, but the two produce different sets of shared libraries, >

Re: Heads up: LLVM repackaging in F24

2016-01-28 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 28-01-16 09:36, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 27-01-16 19:22, Adam Jackson wrote: On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 11:25 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: Aren't clang, lldb, and compiler-rt still part of the main LLVM package sources, though? It would make sense to continue building them as part of the

Re: Heads up: LLVM repackaging in F24

2016-01-28 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 27-01-16 19:22, Adam Jackson wrote: On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 11:25 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: Aren't clang, lldb, and compiler-rt still part of the main LLVM package sources, though? It would make sense to continue building them as part of the LLVM package since they ship together.

Re: Heads up: LLVM repackaging in F24

2016-01-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > LLVM upstream is (eventually) dropping their autotools build system in > favor of their cmake buildsystem. This wouldn't normally be something > you'd notice, but the two produce different sets of shared libraries, >

Heads up: LLVM repackaging in F24

2016-01-27 Thread Adam Jackson
LLVM upstream is (eventually) dropping their autotools build system in favor of their cmake buildsystem. This wouldn't normally be something you'd notice, but the two produce different sets of shared libraries, autotools gave you one big libLLVM and cmake gives you lots of individual libraries.

Re: Heads up: LLVM repackaging in F24

2016-01-27 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 11:25 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > Aren't clang, lldb, and compiler-rt still part of the main LLVM > package sources, though? It would make sense to continue building them > as part of the LLVM package since they ship together. They're distributed as separate tarballs, if

Re: Heads up: LLVM repackaging in F24

2016-01-27 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Jan 27, 2016 11:26, "Neal Gompa" wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > LLVM upstream is (eventually) dropping their autotools build system in > > favor of their cmake buildsystem. This wouldn't normally be something > > you'd