* Colin Walters:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021, at 4:30 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Ondrej Mosnacek:
>>
>> > Kernel 5.12 added support to SELinux for controlling access to the
>> > userfaultfd interface [1][2] and we'd like to implement this in
>> > Fedora's selinux-policy. However, once we add the
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021, at 4:30 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Ondrej Mosnacek:
>
> > Kernel 5.12 added support to SELinux for controlling access to the
> > userfaultfd interface [1][2] and we'd like to implement this in
> > Fedora's selinux-policy. However, once we add the corresponding class
> >
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:30 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Ondrej Mosnacek:
>
> > Kernel 5.12 added support to SELinux for controlling access to the
> > userfaultfd interface [1][2] and we'd like to implement this in
> > Fedora's selinux-policy. However, once we add the corresponding class
> > to
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 7:33 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 06:57:27PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Kernel 5.12 added support to SELinux for controlling access to the
> > userfaultfd interface [1][2] and we'd like to implement this in
> >
* Ondrej Mosnacek:
> Kernel 5.12 added support to SELinux for controlling access to the
> userfaultfd interface [1][2] and we'd like to implement this in
> Fedora's selinux-policy. However, once we add the corresponding class
> to the policy, all SELinux domains for which we don't add the
>
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> The code is available. From what I remember, they had a fairly beefy
> server dedicated to the indexing... But if somebody provides that, it
> should be fairly easy to duplicate.
Michael even expressed interest about setting up an instance, if I
recall correctly,
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 01:20:33PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 05:16:52PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=userfaultfd(=1
> > lists a few candidates…
>
> You beat me to this suggestion. :)
>
> I'd love for Fedora to
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 05:16:52PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=userfaultfd(=1
> lists a few candidates…
You beat me to this suggestion. :)
I'd love for Fedora to someday have a similar service!
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 06:57:27PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Kernel 5.12 added support to SELinux for controlling access to the
> userfaultfd interface [1][2] and we'd like to implement this in
> Fedora's selinux-policy. However, once we add the corresponding class
> to the
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 06:57:27PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Kernel 5.12 added support to SELinux for controlling access to the
> userfaultfd interface [1][2] and we'd like to implement this in
> Fedora's selinux-policy. However, once we add the corresponding class
> to the
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 06:57:27PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Kernel 5.12 added support to SELinux for controlling access to the
> userfaultfd interface [1][2] and we'd like to implement this in
> Fedora's selinux-policy. However, once we add the corresponding class
> to the
Hi all,
Kernel 5.12 added support to SELinux for controlling access to the
userfaultfd interface [1][2] and we'd like to implement this in
Fedora's selinux-policy. However, once we add the corresponding class
to the policy, all SELinux domains for which we don't add the
appropriate rules will
12 matches
Mail list logo
