On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 08:50 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
>
> The LLVM update has the necessary karma now and all the gating tests
> have passed. Should I push this to stable now and then push the mesa
> update later or should we still try to combine the updates?
You can push LLVM and then mesa,
27.09.2019, 16:51, "Tom Stellard" :
> The LLVM update has the necessary karma now and all the gating tests
> have passed. Should I push this to stable now and then push the mesa
> update later or should we still try to combine the updates?
Yes, go for it and push it to stable. I'll submit mesa to
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 13:21 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 20:55 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On 26-09-2019 20:47, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > > On 09/26/2019 11:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 11:20 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> >
On 09/26/2019 01:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 20:55 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On 26-09-2019 20:47, Tom Stellard wrote:
>>> On 09/26/2019 11:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 11:20 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On 09/26/2019
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 20:55 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 26-09-2019 20:47, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > On 09/26/2019 11:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 11:20 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > > > On 09/26/2019 11:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > > We are
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 20:51 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> OTOH we also want F31 to work with current hardware when it ships;
> and llvm is kinda special in this regard, its main use in Fedora
> is inside the graphics stack and mesa needs llvm9 to support the
> AMD Radeon 5700 series cards which
Hi Tom,
On 26-09-2019 20:47, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 09/26/2019 11:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 11:20 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 09/26/2019 11:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
We are currently in the "Beta to Pre Release" phase of the release
cycle. The updates policy
Hi,
On 26-09-2019 20:24, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 11:20 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 09/26/2019 11:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
We are currently in the "Beta to Pre Release" phase of the release
cycle. The updates policy for this phase -
On 09/26/2019 11:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 11:20 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
>> On 09/26/2019 11:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> We are currently in the "Beta to Pre Release" phase of the release
>>> cycle. The updates policy for this phase -
>>>
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 11:20 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On 09/26/2019 11:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > We are currently in the "Beta to Pre Release" phase of the release
> > cycle. The updates policy for this phase -
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Beta_to_Pre_Release -
> >
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 20:13 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Well, we have updated LLVM to next major version even before
> mid-cycle.
I didn't check exactly when this happened before, but note there is a
significant difference between different parts of the cycle. There are
different rules for the
On 09/26/2019 11:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> We are currently in the "Beta to Pre Release" phase of the release
> cycle. The updates policy for this phase -
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Beta_to_Pre_Release -
> says:
>
> "From this point onwards maintainers MUST[1]:
>
>
Well, we have updated LLVM to next major version even before
mid-cycle. Since it is important for graphics stack. Compatibility
package was always created. On the other hand, it requires proper
coordination with other package maintainers.
tl;dr I think it is fine to do rebase before F31 Final,
We are currently in the "Beta to Pre Release" phase of the release
cycle. The updates policy for this phase -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Beta_to_Pre_Release -
says:
"From this point onwards maintainers MUST[1]:
Avoid Major version updates, ABI breakage or API changes if
14 matches
Mail list logo
