Re: Non-responsive packagers: anoopcs, gtiwari, msehnout, sebix, vanessa_kris

2022-01-21 Thread Anoop C S via devel
On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 15:41 +0530, Anoop C S via devel wrote: > On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 02:31:57PM +0530, Anoop C S wrote: > > > On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 09:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > > >

Re: Non-responsive packagers: anoopcs, gtiwari, msehnout, sebix, vanessa_kris

2022-01-21 Thread Matthias Runge
> Am 20.01.2022 um 09:57 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon : > > Good Morning Everyone, > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to > either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS > matches an existing bugzilla account. > > Having a

Re: Non-responsive packagers: anoopcs, gtiwari, msehnout, sebix, vanessa_kris

2022-01-21 Thread Anoop C S via devel
On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 02:31:57PM +0530, Anoop C S wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 09:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email > > >

Re: Non-responsive packagers: anoopcs, gtiwari, msehnout, sebix, vanessa_kris

2022-01-21 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 02:31:57PM +0530, Anoop C S wrote: > On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 09:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking > > them to > > either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the

Re: Non-responsive packagers: anoopcs, gtiwari, msehnout, sebix, vanessa_kris

2022-01-21 Thread Anoop C S via devel
On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 09:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking > them to > either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email > address in FAS > matches an existing bugzilla account. > >

Re: Non-responsive packagers: anoopcs, gtiwari, msehnout, sebix, vanessa_kris

2022-01-21 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:04:25AM +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > > - vanessa_kris contacted since December 10th > > > > vanessa_kris is main admin of rpms/python-git-changelog > > vanessa_kris has a bugzilla override on rpms/python-git-changelog > > vanessa_kris is main admin of

Re: Non-responsive packagers: anoopcs, gtiwari, msehnout, sebix, vanessa_kris

2022-01-20 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello, > - vanessa_kris contacted since December 10th > > vanessa_kris is main admin of rpms/python-git-changelog > vanessa_kris has a bugzilla override on rpms/python-git-changelog > vanessa_kris is main admin of rpms/python-glymur > vanessa_kris has a bugzilla override on rpms/python-glymur

Re: Non-responsive packagers: anoopcs, gtiwari, msehnout, sebix, vanessa_kris

2022-01-20 Thread Dan HorĂ¡k
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:57:06 +0100 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to > either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS > matches an existing bugzilla account. > >

Non-responsive packagers: anoopcs, gtiwari, msehnout, sebix, vanessa_kris

2022-01-20 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per: