Re: OpenVPN, OpenSSL and Fedora 26+

2017-05-01 Thread Rex Dieter
David Sommerseth wrote: > This is actually just a very late heads-up about challenges with OpenVPN > in Fedora 26. > > Fedora is moving towards OpenSSL v1.1, which is in my opinion a sane and > good step forward. Unfortunately, that gives OpenVPN a real challenge. Fyi, now that

Re: OpenVPN, OpenSSL and Fedora 26+

2017-04-28 Thread David Sommerseth
On 27/04/17 23:15, Pete Travis wrote: > > > On Apr 27, 2017 3:13 PM, "David Sommerseth" > wrote: > > On 27/04/17 01:20, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Thanks a lot for the write-up, David. Can you make sure this ends up > >

Re: OpenVPN, OpenSSL and Fedora 26+

2017-04-27 Thread Pete Travis
On Apr 27, 2017 3:13 PM, "David Sommerseth" wrote: On 27/04/17 01:20, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 at 21:18, David Sommerseth wrote: >> On 26/04/17 17:08, Lee Howard wrote: >>> On 04/25/2017 01:39 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: This is

Re: OpenVPN, OpenSSL and Fedora 26+

2017-04-27 Thread David Sommerseth
On 27/04/17 01:20, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 at 21:18, David Sommerseth wrote: >> On 26/04/17 17:08, Lee Howard wrote: >>> On 04/25/2017 01:39 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: This is actually just a very late heads-up about challenges with OpenVPN in

Re: OpenVPN, OpenSSL and Fedora 26+

2017-04-27 Thread Tom Hughes
On 27/04/17 07:38, Tom Hughes wrote: On 25/04/17 21:39, David Sommerseth wrote: So, to be able to provide OpenVPN in Fedora 26 it was decided to switch to mbed TLS instead of OpenSSL (which OpenVPN also supports). That have revealed several issues: Why not just use the openssl 1.0.2 compat

Re: OpenVPN, OpenSSL and Fedora 26+

2017-04-27 Thread Tom Hughes
On 25/04/17 21:39, David Sommerseth wrote: So, to be able to provide OpenVPN in Fedora 26 it was decided to switch to mbed TLS instead of OpenSSL (which OpenVPN also supports). That have revealed several issues: Why not just use the openssl 1.0.2 compat package until you're ready to move to

Re: OpenVPN, OpenSSL and Fedora 26+

2017-04-26 Thread Subhendu Ghosh
Software collections for a segregated sane dep chain On Apr 26, 2017 19:22, "Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski" < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 at 21:18, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 26/04/17 17:08, Lee Howard wrote: > > On 04/25/2017 01:39 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: >

Re: OpenVPN, OpenSSL and Fedora 26+

2017-04-26 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 at 21:18, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 26/04/17 17:08, Lee Howard wrote: > > On 04/25/2017 01:39 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: > >> This is actually just a very late heads-up about challenges with OpenVPN > >> in Fedora 26. > >> > >> Fedora is moving towards OpenSSL v1.1,

Re: OpenVPN, OpenSSL and Fedora 26+

2017-04-26 Thread David Sommerseth
On 26/04/17 17:08, Lee Howard wrote: > On 04/25/2017 01:39 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: >> This is actually just a very late heads-up about challenges with OpenVPN >> in Fedora 26. >> >> Fedora is moving towards OpenSSL v1.1, which is in my opinion a sane and >> good step forward. Unfortunately,

OpenVPN, OpenSSL and Fedora 26+

2017-04-26 Thread David Sommerseth
Hi, This is actually just a very late heads-up about challenges with OpenVPN in Fedora 26. Fedora is moving towards OpenSSL v1.1, which is in my opinion a sane and good step forward. Unfortunately, that gives OpenVPN a real challenge. The OpenSSL v1.1 support is not completed. Patches have

OpenVPN, OpenSSL and Fedora 26+

2017-04-26 Thread David Sommerseth
Hi, This is actually just a very late heads-up about challenges with OpenVPN in Fedora 26. Fedora is moving towards OpenSSL v1.1, which is in my opinion a sane and good step forward. Unfortunately, that gives OpenVPN a real challenge. The OpenSSL v1.1 support is not completed. Patches have