Re: Package notes issues with python wheel building

2022-02-03 Thread Miro HronĨok
On 02. 02. 22 17:15, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: How do I solve this? I need to update to a new version of python-gssapi but I cvan't build it right now. There is a similar bug against krb5: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048909 I guess we need to fix krb5 this way too. Not

Re: Package notes issues with python wheel building

2022-02-03 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Some background: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043092 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/WZKX43VDK4R7BJMA3DEPOHY35RHMGDRX/#O4RK2PKCLU5GD4BTRFARUFOG2W465GS3 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat

Re: Package notes issues with python wheel building

2022-02-02 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 02/02/2022 17:15, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: I guess we need to fix krb5 this way too. Current package notes implementation is awful. It should not touch linker flags. RPM post-build hooks should be used instead for adding annotations. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev

Re: Package notes issues with python wheel building

2022-02-02 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On ke, 02 helmi 2022, Simo Sorce wrote: So I got this bug about FTBFS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049643 These are bindings to C libs and use gcc to build .so files. Upon investigation the issue is that the default linker flags seem to point to non existing package note

Package notes issues with python wheel building

2022-02-02 Thread Simo Sorce
So I got this bug about FTBFS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049643 These are bindings to C libs and use gcc to build .so files. Upon investigation the issue is that the default linker flags seem to point to non existing package note files, so the build fails. It was suggest to