On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:14:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:29:16AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:27:19PM -0800, Adam
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:29:16AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:27:19PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 05:33 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:27:19PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 05:33 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 05:29:35AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 04:28:18AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 04:28:18AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > python3-sympy-0:1.0-3.fc25.noarch
> Pfff, it still fails in the test suite :(
I'm chipping away at this one. There are some failing python2 tests
which I had to disable, but it seems that things are mostly with
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 21:26:03 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 13:00 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > python-gensim
>
> Our version of this is very old. The current upstream version looks
> closer to being buildable, but requires the 'smart_open'
On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 13:00 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> python-gensim
Our version of this is very old. The current upstream version looks
closer to being buildable, but requires the 'smart_open' library, which
isn't packaged for Fedora yet. I'm not really interested in packaging
that just to
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:58:18AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:38:59AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > PS. What's the status of the python3.6 rebuild? Can somebody post
> > a list of work-needing packages?
>
> I guess that the right
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:38:59AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> PS. What's the status of the python3.6 rebuild? Can somebody post
> a list of work-needing packages?
I guess that the right invocation:
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'python(abi) = 3.5'
On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 13:00 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> python-deap zbyszek
This one needed some pandoc packages rebuilt. I have done all of that,
and the python-deap build basically works now (and I enabled the test
suite for it too), but my Rawhide build failed because
On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 13:00 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> python-sphinxcontrib-programoutput itamarjp
> zbyszek
I sent an email about this one the other day. It's been abandoned
upstream for many years and both the things we package that used it
(python-acme and
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> We've recently tried to rebuild all Python packages with Python 3.6.
>> However, we currently have bunch of packages that simply
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> Awesome! Thanks, Toshio!
Unfortunately, sympy still won't build in Rawhide, now due to a newer
matplotlib. Upstream bug report:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/11691
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 02:33:29PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:18:47 +0100
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > I've attached the list of failed packages (failed.txt). You can search
>
> python-ceilometerclient
> python-keystoneclient
> python-manilaclient
>
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Toshio built the new python-sphinx last night... please retry. ;)
Awesome! Thanks, Toshio!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list --
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 14:02:44 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > texlive is *built*, but there's a koji problem with getting it
> > tagged:
> >
> > https://pagure.io/koji/issue/259
>
> A
On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 00:18 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> libproxy
The test suite for this is failing (one of the tests triggers an
exception) on ppc64, ppc64le and aarch64. Not yet sure why. We might
want to ask the arch teams. It passes on x86_64, i686 and armv7hl. This
still happens with the
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> texlive is *built*, but there's a koji problem with getting it tagged:
>
> https://pagure.io/koji/issue/259
A big "thank you" to everybody who worked on fixing the texlive issue.
Unfortunately, sympy still
ons 2016-12-28 klockan 20:25 +0100 skrev Igor Gnatenko:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Miro Hrončok
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > We've recently tried to rebuild all Python packages with Python 3.6.
> > However, we currently have bunch of packages that simply fail to build.
>
On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 12:56 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Attaching current rawhide/koji packages which depend on python 3.5
> > instead of 3.6 still.
>
> Sympy needs texlive to build, so it can't be fixed until
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Attaching current rawhide/koji packages which depend on python 3.5
> instead of 3.6 still.
Sympy needs texlive to build, so it can't be fixed until texlive can
be built in Rawhide again.
--
Jerry James
On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 20:25 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > We've recently tried to rebuild all Python packages with Python 3.6.
> > However, we currently have bunch of packages that simply fail to build.
> >
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi all,
> We've recently tried to rebuild all Python packages with Python 3.6.
> However, we currently have bunch of packages that simply fail to build.
>
> As the list contains >200 packages, it would be very helpful,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi all,
> We've recently tried to rebuild all Python packages with Python 3.6.
> However, we currently have bunch of packages that simply fail to build.
>
> As the list contains >200 packages, it would be very helpful,
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:18:47 +0100
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> python-xlwt
Fixed
Cheers!
--alec
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 2016-12-23 at 14:33 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:18:47 +0100
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > I've attached the list of failed packages (failed.txt). You can search
>
> python-ceilometerclient
> python-keystoneclient
> python-manilaclient
>
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:18:47 +0100
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> I've attached the list of failed packages (failed.txt). You can search
python-ceilometerclient
python-keystoneclient
python-manilaclient
python-swiftclient
These are victims of python-oslo-sphinx, needs a new
On 21.12.2016 00:18, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi all,
We've recently tried to rebuild all Python packages with Python 3.6.
However, we currently have bunch of packages that simply fail to build.
As the list contains >200 packages, it would be very helpful, if you
(package maintainers) could help us
On 21.12.2016 14:52, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
On 12/21/2016 02:39 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 21.12.2016 14:11, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
I think I encountered same issue with libpython3.5m.so.1.0:
Example:
Error: nothing provides libpython3.5m.so.1.0 needed by
python3-cups-1.9.72-9.fc25.i686.
nothing
On 21.12.2016 14:11, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
I think I encountered same issue with libpython3.5m.so.1.0:
Example:
Error: nothing provides libpython3.5m.so.1.0 needed by
python3-cups-1.9.72-9.fc25.i686.
nothing provides libpython3.5m.so.1.0 needed by unbound-libs-1.5.10-1.fc26.i686
Translates
On 21.12.2016 09:53, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:18:47AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
libguestfs
As should be obvious from the (multiple) build failures when you've
been trying to build it over the past few days, this fails because of:
DEBUG util.py:426: Error:
On 21.12.2016 07:41, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 12:18:47 AM CET Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi all,
We've recently tried to rebuild all Python packages with Python 3.6.
However, we currently have bunch of packages that simply fail to build.
...
Everything currently happens in
On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 12:18:47 AM CET Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi all,
> We've recently tried to rebuild all Python packages with Python 3.6.
> However, we currently have bunch of packages that simply fail to build.
> ...
> Everything currently happens in a side tag. I will notify you when
Hi all,
We've recently tried to rebuild all Python packages with Python 3.6.
However, we currently have bunch of packages that simply fail to build.
As the list contains >200 packages, it would be very helpful, if you
(package maintainers) could help us solve the issues, as we cannot go
one
33 matches
Mail list logo