On Saturday, June 16, 2018 1:38:43 AM CEST Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> cgit kevin praiskup tmz
> ...
> praiskup cgit
There are two *.py files mistakenly byte-compiled (scripts used as
filters), but it's OK to wait till
%_python_bytecompile_extra becomes '0' system-wide.
Pavel
On 27.7.2018 10:51, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
On Friday, July 27, 2018 10:01:42 AM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27.7.2018 07:55, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 2:29:17 PM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
Please, either make sure that %py_byte_compile doesn't collide with the
default byte
On Friday, July 27, 2018 10:01:42 AM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 27.7.2018 07:55, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 2:29:17 PM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>> Please, either make sure that %py_byte_compile doesn't collide with the
> >>> default byte compilation machinery, or
On 27.7.2018 07:55, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 2:29:17 PM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
Please, either make sure that %py_byte_compile doesn't collide with the
default byte compilation machinery, or change the default right now (and
define the '%_python_bytecompile_extra 0' in
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 2:29:17 PM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Please, either make sure that %py_byte_compile doesn't collide with the
> > default byte compilation machinery, or change the default right now (and
> > define the '%_python_bytecompile_extra 0' in batch). The former is
> >
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 06:38:43PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> zbyszekcalibre python-music21
I fixed those two.
Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 26.7.2018 14:23, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
On Saturday, June 16, 2018 1:38:43 AM CEST Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
In order to prepare for the default to change in a future release, the
packaging guidelines have changed to require packages which install .py
files outside of the regular python
On Saturday, June 16, 2018 1:38:43 AM CEST Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> In order to prepare for the default to change in a future release, the
> packaging guidelines have changed to require packages which install .py
> files outside of the regular python library locations to do the
> following:
>
On 18.6.2018 11:45, Milan Crha wrote:
On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 11:19 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
What Python are those files for actually? Are they imported or
executed?
Hi,
I do not speak pythonish, I'm sorry, but from what I recall they had
been added as some sort of unit tests. I think
On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 11:19 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> What Python are those files for actually? Are they imported or
> executed?
Hi,
I do not speak pythonish, I'm sorry, but from what I recall they had
been added as some sort of unit tests. I think they are meant to be
executed only,
On 18.6.2018 11:04, Milan Crha wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 10:46 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
evolution-tests:
oh, I see, I do not build/install them locally, thus I didn't notice
them in my $PREFIX. I'll update the evolution package spec file.
What Python are those files for
Hi,
On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 10:46 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> evolution-tests:
oh, I see, I do not build/install them locally, thus I didn't notice
them in my $PREFIX. I'll update the evolution package spec file.
Thanks and bye,
Milan
On 18.6.2018 10:28, Milan Crha wrote:
On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 18:38 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
evolutionalexl caillon caolanm mbarnes mcrha rhughes
rstrode ssp tpopela
Hi,
could I ask how evolution had got into the list, please? Having
installed
On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 18:38 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> evolutionalexl caillon caolanm mbarnes mcrha rhughes
> rstrode ssp tpopela
Hi,
could I ask how evolution had got into the list, please? Having
installed evolution-3.29.2-1.fc29.x86_64 and running:
$ rpm -ql
On 16.6.2018 02:27, Scott Talbert wrote:
* Set %_python_bytecompile_extra to 0 to disable the automatic
compilation of the extra python files.
* Manually byte-compile those files which do actually need to be
compiled. This is done with the %py_byte_compile macro, which as a
bonus requires
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
As part of a recent guideline change
(https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/772) which ties in with an
accepted F29 change
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/No_more_automagic_Python_bytecompilation),
this section of the guidelines was
As part of a recent guideline change
(https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/772) which ties in with an
accepted F29 change
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/No_more_automagic_Python_bytecompilation),
this section of the guidelines was overhauled for F29+:
17 matches
Mail list logo
