On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 20:40, Nicolas Mailhot via devel
wrote:
>
> Le lundi 09 mars 2020 à 00:26 +0100, clime a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> > the code would fail because at that point, the
> > git metadata is already missing (they are not included in srpms).
>
> Can’t storage of built-time information
Le lundi 09 mars 2020 à 00:26 +0100, clime a écrit :
Hi,
> the code would fail because at that point, the
> git metadata is already missing (they are not included in srpms).
Can’t storage of built-time information in srpms be fixed instead of
adding a whole new overlay over existing tools,
Hello nils!
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 16:07, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 12:21 +0100, clime wrote:
> > rpmbuild needs to get a preprocessed spec already.
>
> Hmm, what do you mean with that?
I mean, in this proposal, rpmbuild would need to get an already
preprocessed spec file
On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 12:21 +0100, clime wrote:
> rpmbuild needs to get a preprocessed spec already.
Hmm, what do you mean with that? The spec files we currently have in
dist-git can be built directly with rpmbuild, you just need to tell
rpmbuild that the sources are in the same directory, e.g.:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 11:24, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:36:33PM +0100, clime wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 22:45, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > This would break processing with ‘rpmspec’?
> >
> > With just rpmspec, yes. The preproc-rpmspec tool can
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:36:33PM +0100, clime wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 22:45, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >
> > This would break processing with ‘rpmspec’?
>
> With just rpmspec, yes. The preproc-rpmspec tool can become a wrapper
> around rpmspec aliased prerpmspec essentially doing
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 22:45, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> This would break processing with ‘rpmspec’?
With just rpmspec, yes. The preproc-rpmspec tool can become a wrapper
around rpmspec aliased prerpmspec essentially doing the preprocessing,
then immediately passing the result to rpmspec for
This would break processing with ‘rpmspec’?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the
Hello Fedora people!
I would like to offer a solution for dynamic changelog and release
generation and potentially more.
Intro
--
The solution employs a new type of macros, which can be placed into an
rpm spec file and afterward parsed by preproc utility
