Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

> rpms/hg-git -- Mercurial Plugin for Communicating with Git Servers ( > master f23 f22 epel7 el6 ) After discussion with cicku I am going to take this one, at least temporarily. Petr signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

I took mldonkey - F23+ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

I took zsh-lovers. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

Am Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:10:07 -0700 schrieb Kevin Fenzi : > I have orphaned all these packages now. > > Please take on any that you wish to be point of contact on. > I took this one: > rpms/dvdbackup -- Command line tool for ripping video DVDs ( master > f24 f23 f22 epel7 el6

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

> > > rpms/hawaii-icon-theme -- Icon themes for Hawaii desktop environment ( > master f24 f23 f22 ) > > Took this package -- Out of the box experience http://hawaiios.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > rpms/zopfli -- Zlib compatible better compressor ( master f24 f23 f22 ) Took this one. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:02:36 + Paul Howarth wrote: > On 21/02/16 11:34, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > > > Hi, folks. > > > > It's been announced that Christoper Mang's packages will be orphaned > > next Friday unless he speaks up. A number of Perl packages are > > involved

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

I've taken: dmenu i3 i3-ipc i3lock i3status Greetings, Christian On 02/26/2016 07:20 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> I have orphaned all these packages now. >> >> Please take on any that you wish to be point of

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

Hi, On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I have orphaned all these packages now. > > Please take on any that you wish to be point of contact on. I've taken some package I use: lynis pcapfix python-pefile unhide Best regards. - Athmane -- devel mailing

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

I have orphaned all these packages now. Please take on any that you wish to be point of contact on. I've taken libowfat (I need this for opentracker which we use on torrent.fedoraproject.org), co-maintainers welcome. kevin -- rpms/2ping -- Bi-directional ping utility ( master f24 f23 f22

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

> rpms/backintime -- Simple backup tool inspired from the Flyback I've taken backintime, as always co-maintainers are highly welcome, since it needs quite a bit of work to get it up to date. Thanks, Johannes -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

I can take lilypond, linode-cli, jwm, mopac7, and mscore John. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

2016-02-19 19:09 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer : [cut] As a heads up to the greater community, the packages are listed below. > In the event that we have to go through with the orphaning, please > review them for packages you may wish to take over as the primary > point of

Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

> "FAL" == Fabio Alessandro Locati writes: FAL> If a person is not able to make a click in 7 days (maybe vacation FAL> periods could be excluded from the count), why should he be able to FAL> do so in the following 21 days? I think that a better question is: If a

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On 02/22/2016 10:02 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: On 21/02/16 11:34, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: Hi, folks. It's been announced that Christoper Mang's packages will be orphaned next Friday unless he speaks up. A number of Perl packages are involved and I figured it would be nice to figure who's

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 09:19:50AM +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Fabio Alessandro Locati > wrote: > > If Christopher will not respond, I can take care of: > > > snip > > - rpms/tiptop -- Performance monitoring tool based on hardware

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On 21/02/16 11:34, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: Hi, folks. It's been announced that Christoper Mang's packages will be orphaned next Friday unless he speaks up. A number of Perl packages are involved and I figured it would be nice to figure who's interested in maintaining which package by Friday.

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > If Christopher will not respond, I can take care of: > snip > - rpms/tiptop -- Performance monitoring tool based on hardware counters Hi Fabio, I'm already a co-maintainer on this one, I can take tiptop.

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Petr Šabata wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:09:22PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > rpms/dmenu -- Generic menu for X ( master f23 f22 epel7 el6 ) > > I'll take this one, finally. > P > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:09:22PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > rpms/dmenu -- Generic menu for X ( master f23 f22 epel7 el6 ) I'll take this one, finally. P signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 01:58:55PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/21/2016 11:44 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > > >Now, I think that it makes sense to have the POC/Package Admins able to > >approve and/or decline requests. I think the following 3 improvements > >would greatly improve

Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

Jonathan Underwood wrote: > My personal opinion is that (with a few possible exceptions, perhaps > critical path, or a subset of that), co-maintainership requests > shouldn't ever be turned down. That's really not in the spirit of > Fedora. Which makes me wonder why, for most packages, we even

Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

On 02/21/2016 11:44 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: Now, I think that it makes sense to have the POC/Package Admins able to approve and/or decline requests. I think the following 3 improvements would greatly improve the ACL request experience: - auto-accept the ACL requests after 7 days of

Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

On 21 February 2016 at 10:44, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:10:53AM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote: >> This jumped out at me as particularly worrisome: >> >> On 19 February 2016 at 19:15, Fabio Alessandro Locati >>

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

Hi, folks. It's been announced that Christoper Mang's packages will be orphaned next Friday unless he speaks up. A number of Perl packages are involved and I figured it would be nice to figure who's interested in maintaining which package by Friday. The packages involved: * perl-AnyEvent-I3 *

Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:10:53AM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > This jumped out at me as particularly worrisome: > > On 19 February 2016 at 19:15, Fabio Alessandro Locati > wrote: > > If Christopher will not respond, I can take care of: > [snip] > > Also I can help

Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

This jumped out at me as particularly worrisome: On 19 February 2016 at 19:15, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > If Christopher will not respond, I can take care of: [snip] > Also I can help with the i3 packages as I volounteered few weeks ago and > have been shot down by

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/19/2016 07:09 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > Hello, > > In today's FESCo meeting, FESCo agreed to orphan all of Christoper > Meng's packages on February 26, 2016 at 17:00 UTC if there was no > further contact from Christopher. Normally we would

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On 02/19/2016 07:09 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: Hello, In today's FESCo meeting, FESCo agreed to orphan all of Christoper Meng's packages on February 26, 2016 at 17:00 UTC if there was no further contact from Christopher. Normally we would not necessarily pre-announce an oprhaning action, however

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

I am also interested in maintaining or co-maintaining: rpms/bitbake -- Build tool executing tasks and managing metadata ( master f23 f22 ) --Tim -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

* Josh Boyer [19/02/2016 13:09] : > > As a heads up to the greater community, the packages are listed below. [ snip lots of perl modules ] I'll ping the Perl SIG and ask how many people are willing to share the load. Emmanuel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On 19 February 2016 at 18:09, Josh Boyer wrote: > rpms/PyOpenGL -- Python 2.x bindings for OpenGL ( master f23 f22 ) I am happy to take this (already a co-maintainer). -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

I have an interest in either taking over or co-maintaining: rpms/bwm-ng -- Bandwidth Monitor NG ( master f23 f22 epel7 el6 ) rpms/libstatgrab -- A library that provides cross platform access to statistics of the system ( master f23 f22 epel7 el6 ) I'll have to digest the rest of the list to see

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 08:43:09PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 06:34:03PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > >rpms/python-pygit2 -- Python 2.x bindings for libgit2 ( master f23 f22 > >epel7 ) > > > >whats wrong with this package? I think it is well-maintained

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 06:34:03PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >rpms/python-pygit2 -- Python 2.x bindings for libgit2 ( master f23 f22 >epel7 ) > >whats wrong with this package? I think it is well-maintained by me. It needs an upgrade to 0.23.3 on F23 as otherwise it just failed upon

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

If Christopher will not respond, I can take care of: - rpms/2ping -- Bi-directional ping utility - rpms/NetPIPE -- Network Protocol Independent Performance Evaluator - rpms/ascii-design -- A tool to create ascii arts - rpms/bonesi -- The DDoS Botnet Simulator - rpms/cdk -- Curses Development Kit

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 19/02/2016 19:09, Josh Boyer a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> In today's FESCo meeting, FESCo agreed to orphan all of Christoper >> Meng's packages on February 26, 2016 at 17:00 UTC if there was no >> further contact from

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

Le 19/02/2016 19:09, Josh Boyer a écrit : > Hello, > > In today's FESCo meeting, FESCo agreed to orphan all of Christoper > Meng's packages on February 26, 2016 at 17:00 UTC if there was no > further contact from Christopher. Please, also be aware of 78 pending reviews

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

I no answer from C.M., I will take: > rpms/libsodium -- The Sodium crypto library ( master f23 f22 epel7 el6 ) Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

You are not the owner. This is not a question of maintainance itself in this case (and in case of my i3 stuff too) On 02/19/2016 07:34 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > rpms/python-pygit2 -- Python 2.x bindings for libgit2 ( master f23 f22 > epel7 ) > > whats wrong with this package? I think it is

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

I'll take json-c and qd, since both are Shogun dependencies. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

Btw you can take it after orphaning ;) On 02/19/2016 07:36 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: > You are not the owner. This is not a question of maintainance itself > in this case (and in case of my i3 stuff too) > > On 02/19/2016 07:34 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> rpms/python-pygit2 -- Python 2.x

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

rpms/python-pygit2 -- Python 2.x bindings for libgit2 ( master f23 f22 epel7 ) whats wrong with this package? I think it is well-maintained by me. On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:09 PM Josh Boyer wrote: > Hello, > > In today's FESCo meeting, FESCo agreed to orphan all of

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On 02/19/2016 07:09 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > Hello, > > In today's FESCo meeting, FESCo agreed to orphan all of Christoper > Meng's packages on February 26, 2016 at 17:00 UTC if there was no > further contact from Christopher. Normally we would not necessarily > pre-announce an oprhaning action,