V Fri, May 05, 2023 at 09:10:54PM +0200, Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> Now it uses SPDX identifiers, but lowercase ors, should probably be uppercase
> ORs.
>
I corrected it in perl-Exporter-Tidy-0.08-28.fc39.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Dne 05. 05. 23 v 21:46 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki napsal(a):
Now it uses SPDX identifiers, but lowercase ors, should probably be uppercase
ORs.
Yea. I've been reading through the spec lately, since I want to add proper SPDX
support to my project,
and it says joiners should be uppercase and parsers
> Now it uses SPDX identifiers, but lowercase ors, should probably be uppercase
> ORs.
Yea. I've been reading through the spec lately, since I want to add proper SPDX
support to my project,
and it says joiners should be uppercase and parsers should match
case-sensitively.
> License expression
On 05. 05. 23 17:09, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 03. 05. 23 v 14:38 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
given we're not doing license minimization any more, I'm curious
what package is going to win the prize for the longest license tag :-)
So far:
rpm-specs/perl-Exporter-Tidy.spec: 0BSD or
This is a questionable representation though. The license in question is:
"Pick your favourite OSI approved license :)
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical;
It might be more appropriate to have a license identifier that
consists of those two lines.
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 11:09 AM
Dne 03. 05. 23 v 14:38 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
given we're not doing license minimization any more, I'm curious
what package is going to win the prize for the longest license tag :-)
So far:
rpm-specs/perl-Exporter-Tidy.spec: 0BSD or AAL or AFL-3.0 or AGPL-3.0-only or APSL-2.0 or
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 11:09:04AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Two weeks ago we had:
>
> > * 22918 spec files in Fedora
> >
> > * 29406license tags in all spec files
> >
> > * 19348 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet
> >
> > * 7521tags can be trivially converted using
Am 24.04.23 um 12:41 schrieb Miroslav Suchý:
For example take python-pydyf:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pydyf/commits/rawhide
After git-push it is gone now in the updated stats. Sorry.
Thank you for your time to drive this effort + the quick fix :-)
Felix
Dne 24. 04. 23 v 12:10 Felix Schwarz napsal(a):
I have updated some of my packages, but they're still listed there. I've
used "Update license tag to SPDX" in the changelog.
similar for me.
For example take python-pydyf:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pydyf/commits/rawhide
After
Dne 23. 04. 23 v 11:59 Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
I have updated some of my packages, but they're still listed there. I've
used "Update license tag to SPDX" in the changelog.
Ag! I forgot to git-push. Fixed. Sorry.
Miroslav
___
devel
Am 23.04.23 um 11:59 schrieb Mattia Verga via devel:
I have updated some of my packages, but they're still listed there. I've
used "Update license tag to SPDX" in the changelog.
similar for me.
For example take python-pydyf:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pydyf/commits/rawhide
Dne 23. 04. 23 v 13:29 Richard Shaw napsal(a):
NEW: the package fedora-license-data now contains BNF grammar which you can
use. It is available in
`/usr/share/fedora-license-data/grammar.lark`
You'll have to explain to me the significance of this.
This is good starting point:
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 4:09 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> New version of fedora-license-data and license-validate has been released.
>
> NEW: the package fedora-license-data now contains BNF grammar which you
> can use. It is available in `/usr/share/fedora-license-data/grammar.lark`
>
You'll
Il 23/04/23 11:09, Miroslav Suchý ha scritto:
>
> The list of packages needed to be converted is again here:
>
> https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt
>
> List by package maintainers is here
>
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
