Excellent!
This is what I needed, I was thinking of starting as a Java packager, specially
for the apache-rat package. I'd like to know your opinion on the package or
some (other) recommendation.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Very Thank You!
Of course, You can count on me for anything. I'll try to help where I can.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 9/13/21 8:41 PM, Jhordy M. Caceres Guerra wrote:
Hello!
Hi!
I'm new here, but I would like to be part of this group, I have a little
knowledge of Java and I think I can be helpful for the group's goals.
That would be very helpful considering the states of java (packages) in
Fedora!
> Am 13.09.2021 um 15:41 schrieb Jhordy M. Caceres Guerra
> :
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm new here, but I would like to be part of this group, I have a little
> knowledge of Java and I think I can be helpful for the group's goals.
>
> Note: I know this thread is old, but I didn't know how to join
Hello!
I'm new here, but I would like to be part of this group, I have a little
knowledge of Java and I think I can be helpful for the group's goals.
Note: I know this thread is old, but I didn't know how to join this group,
because this group has no sponsors.
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:19 AM Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 10:44:05 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> >
> > Good Morning!
> >
> > We were planning to discuss this from the Stewardship SIG point of
> > view during today's meeting, and I didn't want to announce any plans
> >
On Tue, May 19, 2020 10:44:05 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
>
> Good Morning!
>
> We were planning to discuss this from the Stewardship SIG point of
> view during today's meeting, and I didn't want to announce any plans
> before that.
>
> However, my suggestion would be to do the following
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:13 AM Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 18:45:12 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 6:17 PM Igor Raits
> > wrote:
> > > Count me in! I don't think I can help much, but at least can give some
> > > suggestions.
> > >
> > > > Let's make
On Tue, May 12, 2020 18:45:12 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 6:17 PM Igor Raits
> wrote:
> > Count me in! I don't think I can help much, but at least can give some
> > suggestions.
> >
> > > Let's make this happen.
> >
> > Good luck, Fabio!
>
> Thanks! Every bit of help
On 5/18/20 5:54 PM, Ty Young wrote:
I'm not advocating for in-kernel drivers. AMD with their drivers has
proven proven what a bad idea that is. I, for the most part, like where
I'm at and the way Nvidia does things. If I'm against it, I don't see
why I would be the one to do it.
This comment
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 07:54:42PM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
> Surely it is the responsibility of those who want such a change to
> make sure that everything that existed before can continue to exist? I
> realize this requires that such arguments are being made in good faith
> and consider the
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:18 PM Ty Young wrote:
>
>
> On 5/18/20 8:24 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >
> > Dude, chill out. We're not going to go back to running X as root. The
> > Nvidia overclocking tool is just not important at all (seriously, who
> > cares?). If you're upset their
On 5/18/20 8:24 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Dude, chill out. We're not going to go back to running X as root. The
Nvidia overclocking tool is just not important at all (seriously, who
cares?). If you're upset their proprietary software doesn't work
anymore, you can ask them nicely to fix
On Monday, May 18, 2020 4:03:16 PM MST Ty Young wrote:
> On 5/18/20 2:51 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> > On 5/18/20 7:27 AM, Ty Young wrote:
> >
> >> The application was an Nvidia GPU overclocking utility written in
> >> Java. When Fedora decided to disable running X. Org as root, it
> >>
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 8:24 pm, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
Dude, chill out. We're not going to go back to running X as root.
Ugh, I just noticed the subject of this thread is Java SIG. Amazing how
thoroughly this conversation has been derailed
Dude, chill out. We're not going to go back to running X as root. The
Nvidia overclocking tool is just not important at all (seriously, who
cares?). If you're upset their proprietary software doesn't work
anymore, you can ask them nicely to fix it please... or ask for the
source code, and
On 5/18/20 7:08 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 06:03:16PM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
Willing to bet you or anyone else here won't.
FYI, this applies to you as well.
You just proved my point:
>If it was Open Source and we were having this discussion, people like
yourself
On Mon, 18 May 2020 18:03:16 -0500, you wrote:
>X. Org as root is **STILL** the standard and Fedora broke it. This is
>why no one wants to support Linux: you constantly break your own
>platform and then cry wolf when people who don't care about your
>ideological nonsense refuse to fix their
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 06:03:16PM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
> Willing to bet you or anyone else here won't.
FYI, this applies to you as well.
- Solomon
--
Solomon Peachypizza at shaftnet dot org (email)
@pizza:shaftnet dot org
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:34 AM Ty Young wrote:
> The "toolchain" isn't broken, other than Gradle developers not caring
> about backwards compatibility but... It works for them, just as
A toolchain with broken links scattered through it is not toolchain.
Building up the .jar files as a
On 5/18/20 2:51 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/18/20 7:27 AM, Ty Young wrote:
The application was an Nvidia GPU overclocking utility written in
Java. When Fedora decided to disable running X. Org as root, it
resulted in the application no longer being able to adjust GPU/Memory
clocks, among
On 5/18/20 7:27 AM, Ty Young wrote:
The application was an Nvidia GPU overclocking utility written in Java.
When Fedora decided to disable running X. Org as root, it resulted in
the application no longer being able to adjust GPU/Memory clocks, among
possible other things. The software worked
On 5/18/20 9:14 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 3:34 PM Ty Young wrote:
On 5/18/20 7:35 AM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
My software didn't magically break just for Fedora because of some bug
in my software. It broke because Fedora decided they wanted to do
something
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 3:34 PM Ty Young wrote:
> On 5/18/20 7:35 AM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
> My software didn't magically break just for Fedora because of some bug
> in my software. It broke because Fedora decided they wanted to do
> something nearly no Linux distro does... something
Le lundi 18 mai 2020 à 08:34 -0500, Ty Young a écrit :
>
> The "toolchain" isn't broken, other than Gradle developers not
> caring about backwards compatibility but... It works for them, just
> as constantly breaking internal kernel APIs works for the Linux
> kernel
The difference, is that you
On 5/18/20 8:34 AM, Ty Young wrote:
...and there are plenty of Open Source projects that don't have
packages yet people contribute to them. This isn't the early 2000 when
barely anyone has internet and sites like Github didn't exist. Sure, a
distro package increases visibility still, but
On 5/18/20 7:35 AM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
Le lundi 18 mai 2020 à 14:12 +0200, Michal Srb a écrit :
Hello,
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:24 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Le vendredi 15 mai 2020 à 08:30 -0700, stan via devel a écrit :
On Fri, 15
Le lundi 18 mai 2020 à 14:12 +0200, Michal Srb a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:24 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > Le vendredi 15 mai 2020 à 08:30 -0700, stan via devel a écrit :
> > > On Fri, 15 May 2020 08:02:34 +0200
> > > Michal Srb
Hello,
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:24 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Le vendredi 15 mai 2020 à 08:30 -0700, stan via devel a écrit :
> > On Fri, 15 May 2020 08:02:34 +0200
> > Michal Srb wrote:
> >
> > An aside, just to clarify for myself. That means that
On Sat, 16 May 2020 11:23:03 +0200
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le vendredi 15 mai 2020 à 08:30 -0700, stan via devel a écrit :
> > On Fri, 15 May 2020 08:02:34 +0200
> > Michal Srb wrote:
> >
> > An aside, just to clarify for myself. That means that all Java apps
> > are
> > the equivalent of
Le vendredi 15 mai 2020 à 08:30 -0700, stan via devel a écrit :
> On Fri, 15 May 2020 08:02:34 +0200
> Michal Srb wrote:
>
> An aside, just to clarify for myself. That means that all Java apps
> are
> the equivalent of statically linked, right? And are related to
> things
> like flatpaks and
On Thu, 14 May 2020 06:33:47 -0500, you wrote:
>* Game developers largely refuse to support Linux, and the some of the
>few that have have or are currently pulling support citing
>fragmentation(support) issues.
Game developers refuse to support Linux because there is no userbase -
even Steam,
On Thu, 14 May 2020 06:59:47 -0500, you wrote:
>What i'm saying is: Distros like Fedora actively hurt the very people
>who are directly or indirectly helping them. There are single-person run
>projects, like mine, out there that can't possibly do all the work
>needed to have a dozen packages
On Fri, 15 May 2020 08:02:34 +0200
Michal Srb wrote:
> > I realize that this is technically possible to achieve, but that is
> > not how people use it. If you want to distribute your Java app, you
> > just bundle it with all its dependencies into a beefy tarball and
> > ship it. And if Java apps
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 2:42 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 14. 05. 20 v 11:53 Michal Srb napsal(a):
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:57 PM Felix Schwarz
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 12.05.20 um 12:32 schrieb Ty Young:
>> > Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to you. I suppose
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 6:38 AM Igor Raits
wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 06:33 -0500, Ty Young wrote:
> > Nonsense spewing with no proof.
>
> Well, you have started this. Can you provide some statistics how many
> bugs were introduced by distributions versus upstream bugs.
My experience has
Well, as just I saw "xscreensaver" word here:
Ty Young wrote on 2020/05/14 20:33:
On 5/13/20 4:58 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:04:50PM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
Anyway, I'm just asking that Fedora not repeat what Debian did. While
I find it to be a bit paranoid, I
Dne 14. 05. 20 v 11:53 Michal Srb napsal(a):
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:57 PM Felix Schwarz
> mailto:fschw...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
>
>
> Am 12.05.20 um 12:32 schrieb Ty Young:
> > Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to you. I
> suppose I
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I wanted to avoid replying to this thread, but this message forced me
to do so since it is spreading misinformation.
On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 06:33 -0500, Ty Young wrote:
> On 5/13/20 4:58 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at
On 5/14/20 6:42 AM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 06:33:47AM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
Whichever you choose. Large projects like Gnome and Fedora refer to
themselves as one large organization one minute and then as individuals the
next. It reminds me of how everyone says "Linux"
Le jeudi 14 mai 2020 à 06:33 -0500, Ty Young a écrit :
>
> I could literally go on and on. The "my-shit-don't-stink" attitude is
> so terrible it's borderline sad.
And years of terminally broken build practices Java-side have finally
resulted in complete capture of all the Java big data code the
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 06:33:47AM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
> Whichever you choose. Large projects like Gnome and Fedora refer to
> themselves as one large organization one minute and then as individuals the
> next. It reminds me of how everyone says "Linux" is less resource hungry
> then Windows
On 5/13/20 4:58 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:04:50PM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
Anyway, I'm just asking that Fedora not repeat what Debian did. While
I find it to be a bit paranoid, I understand the concerns regarding
someone sneaking in malware into pre-build binaries. I'm
Le jeudi 14 mai 2020 à 11:53 +0200, Michal Srb a écrit :
>
> Since there is no standard place for shared Java libraries on your
> laptop,
Of course there is one /usr/share/java, which has been defined and used
by Linux distributions since jpackage times (circa ~2000).
Java is not special from a
On 5/14/20 4:53 AM, Michal Srb wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:57 PM Felix Schwarz
mailto:fschw...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
Am 12.05.20 um 12:32 schrieb Ty Young:
> Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to you. I
suppose I
> should have been more
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:55 PM Michal Srb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:57 PM Felix Schwarz
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 12.05.20 um 12:32 schrieb Ty Young:
>> > Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to you. I suppose
>> I
>> > should have been more clear there. Sorry
Hello,
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:57 PM Felix Schwarz
wrote:
>
> Am 12.05.20 um 12:32 schrieb Ty Young:
> > Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to you. I suppose I
> > should have been more clear there. Sorry for any confusion, it was aimed
> at
> > the Fedora project as a
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:59 PM Ty Young wrote:
> As someone who has been burned due to Fedora's goody little two shoes
> policies, I'd kindly ask that Fedora take a hike and not package the
> software at all.
I find it kind of ironic that this is exactly what happened, but you
seem not to be
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:38 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:46 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > So, if you're interested, please consider joining this group effort.
> > I'll get new members set up with the FAS group / pagure project / mailing
> > list.
>
> Like some others
On 5/13/20 4:16 PM, James Cassell wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2020, at 5:04 PM, Ty Young wrote:
On 5/13/20 12:04 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote:
Ty Young writes:
On 5/12/20 5:55 AM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Am 12.05.20 um 12:32 schrieb Ty Young:
Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:04:50PM -0500, Ty Young wrote:
> Anyway, I'm just asking that Fedora not repeat what Debian did. While
> I find it to be a bit paranoid, I understand the concerns regarding
> someone sneaking in malware into pre-build binaries. I'm just asking
> Fedora not package the
On Wed, May 13, 2020, at 5:04 PM, Ty Young wrote:
>
> On 5/13/20 12:04 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > Ty Young writes:
> >
> >> On 5/12/20 5:55 AM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> >>> Am 12.05.20 um 12:32 schrieb Ty Young:
> >>>
> Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to you. I
>
On 5/13/20 12:04 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote:
Ty Young writes:
On 5/12/20 5:55 AM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Am 12.05.20 um 12:32 schrieb Ty Young:
Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to you. I
suppose I should have been more clear there. Sorry for any
confusion, it was aimed at
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:46 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> So, if you're interested, please consider joining this group effort.
> I'll get new members set up with the FAS group / pagure project / mailing
> list.
Like some others who have responded, I probably won't be much help due
to lack of
Ty Young writes:
> On 5/12/20 5:55 AM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>> Am 12.05.20 um 12:32 schrieb Ty Young:
>>
>>> Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to you. I
>>> suppose I should have been more clear there. Sorry for any
>>> confusion, it was aimed at the Fedora project as a whole
On 13.05.20 14:55, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:57:43PM -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>> The only way to make sure that the stuff included with Fedora is open
>> source is to build it from source - simply grabbing a binary provided
>> by an upstream means upstream could slip
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:57:43PM -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> The only way to make sure that the stuff included with Fedora is open
> source is to build it from source - simply grabbing a binary provided
> by an upstream means upstream could slip in some closed source
> portions or have such
Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> The only way to make sure that the stuff included with Fedora is open
> source is to build it from source - simply grabbing a binary provided
> by an upstream means upstream could slip in some closed source
> portions or have such a complex and undocumented build system
On Tue, 12 May 2020 15:58:39 -0500, you wrote:
>As someone who has been burned due to Fedora's goody little two shoes
>policies, I'd kindly ask that Fedora take a hike and not package the
>software at all.
The only way to make sure that the stuff included with Fedora is open
source is to build
Ty,
On 2020-05-13 06:58, Ty Young wrote:
On 5/12/20 5:55 AM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Am 12.05.20 um 12:32 schrieb Ty Young:
Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to you. I
suppose I
should have been more clear there. Sorry for any confusion, it was
aimed at
the Fedora project
On 5/12/20 5:55 AM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Am 12.05.20 um 12:32 schrieb Ty Young:
Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to you. I suppose I
should have been more clear there. Sorry for any confusion, it was aimed at
the Fedora project as a whole as this is a Fedora issue.
This
On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 21:45 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> This past weekend I finally decided to jump off the cliff and attempt
> to re-launch the Java SIG. It seems there's some interest in keeping
> the Java stack maintained, it's just not focused or organized right
> now.
>
> What we did
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 6:17 PM Igor Raits
wrote:
> Count me in! I don't think I can help much, but at least can give some
> suggestions.
>
> > Let's make this happen.
>
> Good luck, Fabio!
Thanks! Every bit of help counts.
You should now be all set with FAS group / pagure project / mailing
list
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 5:43 PM Markku Korkeala wrote:
> Great, really appreciate your work.
Thank you!
> Count me in! I'm relatively new to fedora and rpm packaging, but got ~20
> years of working with Java and my packages depends on the Java
> ecosystem. FAS account: korkeala.
>
> Markku.
On 5/12/20 11:55 AM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Am 12.05.20 um 12:32 schrieb Ty Young:
>> Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to you. I suppose I
>> should have been more clear there. Sorry for any confusion, it was aimed at
>> the Fedora project as a whole as this is a Fedora
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 21:45 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> This past weekend I finally decided to jump off the cliff and attempt
> to re-launch the Java SIG. It seems there's some interest in keeping
> the Java stack maintained, it's just not
On 5/11/20 10:45 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> This past weekend I finally decided to jump off the cliff and attempt
> to re-launch the Java SIG. It seems there's some interest in keeping
> the Java stack maintained, it's just not focused or organized right
> now
Great, really appreciate your work.
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:53:32AM -0400, Omair Majid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A bit of a tangential question:
>
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
>
> > So maybe just nuke the outdated parts (member lists, "state of affairs"
> > content), and keep the rest?
>
> My wiki-foo sucks. Is there some
Hi,
A bit of a tangential question:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> So maybe just nuke the outdated parts (member lists, "state of affairs"
> content), and keep the rest?
My wiki-foo sucks. Is there some way to automatically generate a list of
members on the wiki from a FAS group?
- Original Message -
> From: "Fabio Valentini"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 9:44:33 AM
> Subject: Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:34 PM Alex Scheel wrote:
> >
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:34 PM Alex Scheel wrote:
>
> Obviously count us in, Fabio :-)
*Us* means the three guys from the Dogtag PKI team? :)
> Do we need a two-step bootstrap process? A first (offline) step where we run
> gradle-wrapper and fetch all the resources, put all online dependencies
Obviously count us in, Fabio :-)
- Original Message -
> From: "Fabio Valentini"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 6:39:04 AM
> Subject: Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:02 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> Good luck with that! As someone that has been part of the Java SIG since day
> 0 I wish you make Fedora even better workstation for Java developer than we
> ever managed.
Thank you! You're welcome to (re-)join the effort, we'd be
On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 21:45 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> This past weekend I finally decided to jump off the cliff and attempt
> to re-launch the Java SIG. It seems there's some interest in keeping
> the Java stack maintained, it's just not focused or organized right
> now.
>
> What we did
On 5/12/20 5:39 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:34 PM Ty Young wrote:
Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to you. I suppose
I should have been more clear there. Sorry for any confusion, it was
aimed at the Fedora project as a whole as this is a Fedora
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:46 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> This past weekend I finally decided to jump off the cliff and attempt
> to re-launch the Java SIG. It seems there's some interest in keeping
> the Java stack maintained, it's just not focused or organized right
> now.
>
> What we did when
Am 12.05.20 um 12:32 schrieb Ty Young:
> Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to you. I suppose I
> should have been more clear there. Sorry for any confusion, it was aimed at
> the Fedora project as a whole as this is a Fedora issue.
This is not a Fedora issue but a consequence
On 12.05.2020 10:35, Ty Young wrote:
> JUST PACKAGE THE PRE-COMPILED BUILDS!!!
No. Please read Fedora packaging guidelines. All packages **must** be
built from sources.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list --
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:34 PM Ty Young wrote:
> Right, I figured it was some Fedora policy and not up to you. I suppose
> I should have been more clear there. Sorry for any confusion, it was
> aimed at the Fedora project as a whole as this is a Fedora issue.
I am aware that Arch is just
On 5/12/20 3:48 AM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Am 12.05.20 um 10:35 schrieb Ty Young:
JUST PACKAGE THE PRE-COMPILED BUILDS!!!
Don't take me as rude but this is not possible.
This is documented in Fedora's packaging policies:
t just won't work, like, ever again. I
> > wrote a longer response here:
> > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/re-launching-the-java-sig/19688/3
> > So, you are welcome to try, but I bet you'll end up in the long line
> > of packagers who failed to make it work.
>
>
Hey Fabio,
thank you very much for your work.
I can't take on more Fedora work but still wanted to express my gratitude :-)
Felix
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Am 12.05.20 um 10:35 schrieb Ty Young:
> JUST PACKAGE THE PRE-COMPILED BUILDS!!!
Don't take me as rude but this is not possible.
This is documented in Fedora's packaging policies:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/what-can-be-packaged/#prebuilt-binaries-or-libraries
to support gradle, even
in some partial form, than to rewrite build systems of hundreds of
packages...).
Uh. We tried. Multiple times. It just won't work, like, ever again. I
wrote a longer response here:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/re-launching-the-java-sig/19688/3
So, you are welcome
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:15 AM Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 09:50:30 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > >
> > > Yep, count me in.
> >
> > Thanks. I'll get your memberships set up. :)
>
> Thank you for starting this off, and thank you for taking care of the
> Java packages in the
On Tue, May 12, 2020 09:50:30 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > Yep, count me in.
>
> Thanks. I'll get your memberships set up. :)
Thank you for starting this off, and thank you for taking care of the
Java packages in the meantime too. We really appreciate it. Please count
me in also. :)
, in the long term it seems better to support gradle, even
> in some partial form, than to rewrite build systems of hundreds of
> packages...).
Uh. We tried. Multiple times. It just won't work, like, ever again. I
wrote a longer response here:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/re-launch
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:45:15PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> This past weekend I finally decided to jump off the cliff and attempt
> to re-launch the Java SIG. It seems there's some interest in keeping
> the Java stack maintained, it's just not focused or organized right
> now.
>
> What we
This past weekend I finally decided to jump off the cliff and attempt
to re-launch the Java SIG. It seems there's some interest in keeping
the Java stack maintained, it's just not focused or organized right
now.
What we did when starting the Stewardship SIG seems to have worked out
pretty well,
89 matches
Mail list logo
