On 11/11/2012 10:01 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 11/06/2012 06:07 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
And please, please, please could we trim quotes to relevant ones? Thanks!
Ohmahgerd, thank you for saying that. I am all for bottom posting but
the
On 11/06/2012 06:07 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
And please, please, please could we trim quotes to relevant ones? Thanks!
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
So give me the permission [1] as well as the others who requested it
before me.
Apparently the current owner doesn't care. You can compare the
version
history in koji [2] and [3] and if he doesn't care about one package,
it
is reasonable
Dne 6.11.2012 16:40, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
On 11/06/2012 04:32 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/06/2012 01:07 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
Could you create fesco ticket for this package? I proposed usage of
the script in Johann's ticket
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 09:49 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
You are still maintainer, you are still owner and you are notified by
email about every change in your package, so you'll be able to catch
such activity pretty soon and act accordingly.
To be the devil's advocate, you do get the email
Dne 7.11.2012 09:52, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 6.11.2012 16:40, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
On 11/06/2012 04:32 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/06/2012 01:07 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
Could you create fesco ticket for this package? I proposed
Dne 7.11.2012 10:00, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 09:49 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
You are still maintainer, you are still owner and you are notified by
email about every change in your package, so you'll be able to catch
such activity pretty soon and act accordingly.
To
: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
So give me the permission [1] as well as the others who requested it
before me.
Apparently the current owner doesn't care. You can compare the
version
history in koji [2] and [3] and if he doesn't
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 10:12 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 7.11.2012 10:00, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 09:49 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
You are still maintainer, you are still owner and you are notified by
email about every change in your package, so you'll be able to
...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
So give me the permission [1] as well as the others who requested it
before me.
Apparently the current owner doesn't care. You can compare the
version
Vít Ondruch wrote:
Come on, there are the same alarmist who think that Wikipedia will be
hijacked and destroyed but have it happened any time?
Edit wars often break out on Wikipedia. That's not something I would
like to see in Fedora.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lamest_edit_wars
Dne 5.11.2012 10:22, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
On 11/02/2012 06:57 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 10:28:11 AM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
Dne 5.11.2012 10:22, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
On 11/02/2012 06:57 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 10:28:11 AM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
Dne 5.11.2012 10:22, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
On 11/02/2012 06:57 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06
@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 12:55:27 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
I don't know what are you reading in my response, but I definitely
did
not propose anything like noone wants people that are ready to do
one
thing in a year.
Vit
Dne
: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
I don't know what are you reading in my response, but I definitely
did
not propose anything like noone wants people that are ready to do
one
thing in a year.
Vit
Dne 6.11.2012 09:52, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
Where is the community spirit? What
Is it really that hard for you people to follow our mailing list
guidelines[1]?
JBG
1.https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#If_You_Are_Replying_to_a_Message
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 12:55:27 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
I don't know what are you reading in my response, but I definitely
did
not propose anything like noone wants people that are ready
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 12:55:27 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
I don't know what are you reading in my response, but I definitely
did
not propose anything like noone
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
So give me the permission [1] as well as the others who requested it
before me
Dne 6.11.2012 14:17, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
So give me the permission [1] as well
On 11/06/2012 02:24 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 6.11.2012 14:17, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer
On 11/06/2012 01:07 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
Could you create fesco ticket for this package? I proposed usage of
the script in Johann's ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/967#comment:7 Imho it might be
better to give acl to more people, then
On 11/06/2012 04:32 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/06/2012 01:07 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
Could you create fesco ticket for this package? I proposed usage of
the script in Johann's ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/967#comment:7 Imho
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 16:04:39 +0100,
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
When I do not react upon requests, I usually either missed or forgot
about the request or deliberately do not yet want to approve.
That said, what I feel is missing in Fedora's pkgdb web-forms is an
option to
On 11/02/2012 06:57 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?B?IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc29uIg==?=
johan...@gmail.com
On 11/05/2012 09:22 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
You are using your use-case for everyone. If you insist on automatic
process, then the metric should work with more data.
It's good that we elected FESCO to find out and decide which appropriate
metric data should be used to determine that...
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 9:20:05 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
Wrong. Do you know how
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 06:12:02PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/02/2012 06:05 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
No, they might simply have had nothing to do. Sometimes
applications are stable, have no releases, and have no bugs files
against them.
sigh
Then those individuals would
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?B?IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc29uIg==?=
johan...@gmail.com writes:
On 11/02/2012 03:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 03:12:56PM +,
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?B?IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc29uIg==?=
johan...@gmail.com writes:
On 11/02/2012 03:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 17:57:57 +,
\Jóhann B. Guðmundsson\ johan...@gmail.com wrote:
Surely if an individual has not logged into for several months into
our infrastructure he must be inactive no?
Not necessarily. You can watch things without having to login to
infrastructure. Unless
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
On 11/02/2012 06:05 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
No, they might simply have had nothing to do. Sometimes applications
are stable, have no releases, and have no bugs files against them.
sigh
Then those individuals would simply respond to the email that that was
the case and they are still alive
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 7:57:57 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
Wrong. Do you know how few of the problems we see in Eclipse land don't need
fixes upstreams? And some of these issues require man/months (years sometimes)
upstream before there is smth to show in Fedora. Don't make your assumptions
based on
Once upon a time, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com said:
Surely if an individual has not logged into for several months into our
infrastructure he must be inactive no?
I maintain just a couple of low-overhead packages, and I haven't changed
either in a couple of years. The only time
37 matches
Mail list logo
