> I am big fan of using FAS for SIG membership:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Ruby#Members
>
> Not that we would did some cleanup of that group, but in theory, the
> inactive members could be removed easier then just editing some random
> wiki page.
I am sure that maintaining members of
Dne 16. 02. 23 v 1:08 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 09:51:37AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Yep. Sigs exist because they say they do. ;)
The risc-v sig has been around for a while, but I guess a sig wiki page
was never made. :(
I like that we have low barriers to entry
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 09:51:37AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Yep. Sigs exist because they say they do. ;)
>
> The risc-v sig has been around for a while, but I guess a sig wiki page
> was never made. :(
I like that we have low barriers to entry for SIGs, but we end up with a
> Yep. Sigs exist because they say they do. ;)
>
> The risc-v sig has been around for a while, but I guess a sig wiki page
> was never made. :(
>
> So, sure, we should setup a page and point to the discussion topic and
> irc/matrix rooms. :)
>
> If you could do that it
On 2/9/23 08:49, David Abdurachmanov wrote:
There are two generic issues in Fedora that keep popping up:
- Wrong assumption about valgrind. Those are easy to fix, but are in a
number of places. Note that valgrind upstreaming will happen
relatively soonish too.
Yea, but I don't have a high
; I support creating a SIG.
>
> I'll wait for some more replies and then see what paperwork is needed.
> IIRC, it's mostly a question of creating a page with a short intro
> and a list of names.
Yep. Sigs exist because they say they do. ;)
The risc-v sig has been around for a while, but
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:24 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 08:06:33AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 8:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > David is building Fedora 37+ for RISC-V:
> > >
> > > http://fedora.riscv.rocks/koji/
> > >
> >
> > If I
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 08:06:33AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 8:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > David is building Fedora 37+ for RISC-V:
> >
> > http://fedora.riscv.rocks/koji/
> >
>
> If I remember rightly, this still doesn't build straight from Fedora
> Dist-Git as
> > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:38:38AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > to return to the recent thread [1] "RISC-V — are we ready for more,
> > > > &g
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > to return to the recent thread [1] "RISC-V — are we ready for more,
> > > > and what do we need to do it?": should we have a RISC-V SIG group to
> > > > coordinate and make
ecent thread [1] "RISC-V — are we ready for more,
> > > and what do we need to do it?": should we have a RISC-V SIG group to
> > > coordinate and make it easier to find the resources?
> > >
> > > This is primarily a question to people who are workin
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:03:27AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:55:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:38:38AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > I just got a VF2 as well (as in, yesterday). I'm still waiting on
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:55:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:38:38AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I just got a VF2 as well (as in, yesterday). I'm still waiting on
> some bits and pieces before I try to make it work.
FWIW, it seems to work fine
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:55:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:38:38AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > to return to the recent thread [1] "RISC-V — are we ready for more,
> > and what do we need to do i
[Adding DJ]
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:38:38AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to return to the recent thread [1] "RISC-V — are we ready for more,
> and what do we need to do it?": should we have a RISC-V SIG group to
> coordinate and make it eas
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:38:38AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to return to the recent thread [1] "RISC-V — are we ready for more,
> and what do we need to do it?": should we have a RISC-V SIG group to
> coordinate and make it eas
Hi,
to return to the recent thread [1] "RISC-V — are we ready for more,
and what do we need to do it?": should we have a RISC-V SIG group to
coordinate and make it easier to find the resources?
This is primarily a question to people who are working on this already
(David A., Richard
17 matches
Mail list logo
