On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 09:46, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Or possibly we end up with a mixture of (2) and (3) where most firmware
> are under an umbrella but a few oddballs with unusual terms justify a
> dedicated LicenseRef.
I'm also interested from a LVFS firmware point of view. At the moment
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 03:02:34PM -0400, Richard Fontana wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 5:13 AM Robert-André Mauchin
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm doing a MR on an old package that contains firmware data.
> >
> > I wanna convert to SPDX, what is the equivalent to "Redistributable, no
> >
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 5:13 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm doing a MR on an old package that contains firmware data.
>
> I wanna convert to SPDX, what is the equivalent to "Redistributable, no
> modification
> permitted" in SPDX.
>
> The license is:
>
> The files in the
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 4:26 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 3:13 AM Robert-André Mauchin
> wrote:
> > I'm doing a MR on an old package that contains firmware data.
> >
> > I wanna convert to SPDX, what is the equivalent to "Redistributable, no
> > modification
> > permitted"
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 3:13 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> I'm doing a MR on an old package that contains firmware data.
>
> I wanna convert to SPDX, what is the equivalent to "Redistributable, no
> modification
> permitted" in SPDX.
[snip]
> What can I use for SPDX?
According to
Hi,
I'm doing a MR on an old package that contains firmware data.
I wanna convert to SPDX, what is the equivalent to "Redistributable, no modification
permitted" in SPDX.
The license is:
The files in the directory src/miniloader are provided pursuant to the
following license agreement:
