I've opened [1], please take a look. After it is merged, I'll start the
package retirement process for mailx.
Thanks,
Nikola
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/s-nail/pull-request/3
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hi guys, I am ok with retiring the mailx package so s-nail can become the
primary
supplier of the mailx command.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 1:05 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 12:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 18:47, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > >
>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 12:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 18:47, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 10:38 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > I'm definitely in favor. I hit this broken step a while back myself. ;(
> > >
> > > Hopefully the current
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 18:47, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 10:38 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I'm definitely in favor. I hit this broken step a while back myself. ;(
> >
> > Hopefully the current maintainers are on board with this?
>
> Yeah, honestly, I'm not sure a Change is
On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 10:38 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I'm definitely in favor. I hit this broken step a while back myself. ;(
>
> Hopefully the current maintainers are on board with this?
Yeah, honestly, I'm not sure a Change is the right way to go about
this, it seems like it could just be
I'm definitely in favor. I hit this broken step a while back myself. ;(
Hopefully the current maintainers are on board with this?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 13:18 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > Can we retire the mailx package, and then update s-nail with:
> >
> > Provides: mailx = %{version}-%{release}
> >
> > (this would work fine because mailx is at 12.5 and s-nail forked
> > from
> > that and is now at 14.9, so upgrading
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 12:34 PM Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
>
> Today I learned (the hard way) that Fedora's mailx package (aka
> Heirloom mailx) is ancient and buggy. Upstream has been dead for over
> a decade and features documented in its man page don't work. The good
> news is that Fedora (and
Today I learned (the hard way) that Fedora's mailx package (aka
Heirloom mailx) is ancient and buggy. Upstream has been dead for over
a decade and features documented in its man page don't work. The good
news is that Fedora (and RHEL and CentOS) already have s-nail, which
was forked from it ages
