Re: Storing package metadata in ELF objects

2021-05-24 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 16:58 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Guillem, > > On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 02:19 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > So this is where I guess I'm missing something. To be able to make > > sense of the coredumps there are two things that might end up being > > relevant, backtraces

Re: Storing package metadata in ELF objects

2021-05-20 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Guillem, On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 02:19 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > So this is where I guess I'm missing something. To be able to make > sense of the coredumps there are two things that might end up being > relevant, backtraces and source code. systemd-coredump might already > emit a backtrace,

Re: Storing package metadata in ELF objects

2021-05-14 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Fri, 2021-05-14 at 12:41 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 13:38:31 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 13:29 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > After an initial discussion [0], recently we have been working on a new > > > specification [0] to encode rich

Re: Storing package metadata in ELF objects

2021-05-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Thu, 2021-05-06 at 03:17 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Luca, > > On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 14:43 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 19:57 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > Is there a list of default keys (and their canonical spelling, upper- > > > lower-Camel_Case, etc.)? If

Re: Storing package metadata in ELF objects

2021-05-05 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Luca, On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 14:43 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 19:57 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Is there a list of default keys (and their canonical spelling, upper- > > lower-Camel_Case, etc.)? If there is, could we have a "debuginfod" key > > with as value an URL

Re: Storing package metadata in ELF objects

2021-05-04 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 19:57 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 18:44 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > [I'm forwarding the mail from Luca who is not subscribed to fedora- > > devel] > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 01:38:31PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > >

Re: Storing package metadata in ELF objects

2021-04-30 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 18:44 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > [I'm forwarding the mail from Luca who is not subscribed to fedora- > devel] > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 01:38:31PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Cross-posting to the mailing lists of a few relevant projects. Note that in

Re: Storing package metadata in ELF objects

2021-04-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
[I'm forwarding the mail from Luca who is not subscribed to fedora-devel] On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 01:38:31PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: Hello, Cross-posting to the mailing lists of a few relevant projects. After an initial discussion [0], recently we have been working on a new specification

Re: Storing package metadata in ELF objects

2021-04-10 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 13:29 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Hello, > > Cross-posting to the mailing lists of a few relevant projects. > > After an initial discussion [0], recently we have been working on a new > specification [0] to encode rich package-level metadata inside ELF > objects, so that