On 04/18/2017 12:17 AM, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
I believe that everyone comes from MS Windows to Linux will need to YAST,
currently it provides many modules that makes system management very easy:
* service management, what services are running, what are stopped, and user can
change
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Adam Williamson
>>> It was tried for
>>> Fedora years ago, and discarded with a passion.
>>
>> What 'was tried for Fedora'? What are you referring to?
>
> Linuxconf, which was much
I believe that everyone comes from MS Windows to Linux will need to YAST,
currently it provides many modules that makes system management very easy:
* service management, what services are running, what are stopped, and user can
change their status.
* systemd control
* hardware configuration
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 22:23 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:04:57AM -, Farhad
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 22:23 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:04:57AM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> > >
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:04:57AM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
>> > Because we think it's fundamentally a wrong approach.
>> >
>> >
Fedora now have cockpit, it is a nice shell for some administrative tasks
in the system
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 09:14 -0400, Christian Schaller wrote:
>> Actually isn't Cockpit our 'YAST', I mean it is not a 1to1 thing, but
>> for a lot of things Cockpit provides the featureset a sysadmin would
>>
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 09:14 -0400, Christian Schaller wrote:
> Actually isn't Cockpit our 'YAST', I mean it is not a 1to1 thing, but
> for a lot of things Cockpit provides the featureset a sysadmin would
> want.
Yeah, Cockpit is an interesting one. But I see it as being a sort of
webapp 'desktop
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 07:45 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:04:57AM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> >
> > You seem to have missed this in Adam's email
>
> No, I don't missed anything.
>
> > i) just getting things right so we don't need a giant pile of
>
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
>> Hello, SUSE distributions have a system control panel that can configure
>> many aspects of the system. It is the best feature I saw in SUSE, it is very
>>
what's left, but I'd
sooner look for enhancement elsewhere than include YaST in Fedora.
Chris Murphy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> Hello, SUSE distributions have a system control panel that can configure many
> aspects of the system. It is the best feature I saw in SUSE, it is very
> interesting, useful and beneficial for all users.
>
> * Why Fedora does not
scussions related to Fedora"
> <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 2:02:57 AM
> Subject: Re: YAST for Fedora?
>
> On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> > Hello, SUSE distributions have a system control panel that c
>
> "so we don't need" What is his mean about "WE" ?!
>
I believe "WE" should be read as the Community, and the Community includes a
lot of different type of users.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:04:57AM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
>
> You seem to have missed this in Adam's email
No, I don't missed anything.
> i) just getting things right so we don't need a giant pile of
> configuration tools
> ii) tools written at more appropriate layers, mainly
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:04:57AM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> > Because we think it's fundamentally a wrong approach.
> >
> > It's not really a question of resources, but of not thinking this is
> > the correct
> On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> Because we think it's fundamentally a wrong approach.
>
> It's not really a question of resources, but of not thinking this is
> the correct approach.
What is the correct approach?! Wasting lots of time on:
* reading
As someone who came to Fedora from openSUSE, yeah, Adam, YaST is definitely
a bad approach. It was great for things I did *once* when I set up a box,
but for the stuff I did regularly - install / uninstall packages, build
stuff from source, etc. - the command line tools beat the crap out of GUIs.
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> Hello, SUSE distributions have a system control panel that can configure many
> aspects of the system. It is the best feature I saw in SUSE, it is very
> interesting, useful and beneficial for all users.
>
> * Why Fedora does not
Hello, SUSE distributions have a system control panel that can configure many
aspects of the system. It is the best feature I saw in SUSE, it is very
interesting, useful and beneficial for all users.
* Why Fedora does not have such tool?
* How much money is need to develop such tool from
21 matches
Mail list logo