On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 10:10 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 01:12:00PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > I think this will make quite a few packages FTBFS on i686 because they
> > require pandoc at build time. It's not that many—I count ~75 that
>
> Is there any reason to
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 01:12:00PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I think this will make quite a few packages FTBFS on i686 because they
> require pandoc at build time. It's not that many—I count ~75 that
Is there any reason to build docs for i686 packages? (With or without some
cleverness that
Thanks, Florian, very good point.
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 7:12 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
> I think this will make quite a few packages FTBFS on i686 because they
> require pandoc at build time. It's not that many—I count ~75 that
> build-depend on something pandoc-ish without also
* Jens-Ulrik Petersen:
> We have been building i386 packages for ghc and Haskell for a long
> time, but I think it is time to stop for Fedora 39. So as part of F39
> Haskell updates, I plan to disable 32bit ix86 builds across all the
> packages: I doubt anyone is still using them anyway.
I think
We have been building i386 packages for ghc and Haskell for a long time,
but I think it is time to stop for Fedora 39. So as part of F39 Haskell
updates, I plan to disable 32bit ix86 builds across all the packages: I
doubt anyone is still using them anyway.
Jens
