Re: dnf behavior expected?

2015-12-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:20:34 -0500, Zach Villers wrote: > > Anything about that in /var/log/dnf*? > > > > Yes - here is a grep of "kernel" from /var/log/dnf - you can see the > kernels that were removed in the transaction - > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/298642/ Don't use grep for tasks like

Re: dnf behavior expected?

2015-12-08 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:39:50 -0500, Zach Villers wrote: > Sorry if this is the wrong list; > > I am running the rawhide-no-debug-alloc kernel with F23. I had three saved > 4.3 kernels. dnf.conf was not changed. I wanted to keep a total of six > kernels and edited /etc/dnf/protected.d/dnf.conf to

Re: dnf behavior expected?

2015-12-08 Thread Zach Villers
> > > I am running the rawhide-no-debug-alloc kernel with F23. I had three > saved > > 4.3 kernels. dnf.conf was not changed. I wanted to keep a total of six > > kernels and edited /etc/dnf/protected.d/dnf.conf to read; > > > > [main] > > gpgcheck=1 > > installonlypkgs=kernel.x86_64,

dnf behavior expected?

2015-12-08 Thread Zach Villers
Sorry if this is the wrong list; I am running the rawhide-no-debug-alloc kernel with F23. I had three saved 4.3 kernels. dnf.conf was not changed. I wanted to keep a total of six kernels and edited /etc/dnf/protected.d/dnf.conf to read; [main] gpgcheck=1 installonlypkgs=kernel.x86_64,