On Mon, 2023-11-13 at 11:50 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:02:29AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > Neither I nor nirik can reproduce this as described.
>
> Anyhow, as far as I can see the image is the GA f39 image and is
> right
> and correct, it's just the web page
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:02:29AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Neither I nor nirik can reproduce this as described. Note the web UI is
> basically just lies / incomplete info; I think it's telling you when
> the tag was created, not when the image behind it was last updated.
The web page
On Mon, 2023-11-13 at 19:28 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 12:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 19:07 +, Chris Kelley wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I have a GitHub Action
> > >
On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 12:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 19:07 +, Chris Kelley wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have a GitHub Action
> > (https://github.com/dogtagpki/jss/actions/runs/5810230552/job/15794
> > 978022) that fails due to a conflict between dnf and dnf5
I see, thanks for the advice! I made that change and job's a good 'un.
Cheers,
Chris
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 at 20:38, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 19:07 +, Chris Kelley wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have a GitHub Action (
>
On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 19:07 +, Chris Kelley wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a GitHub Action
> (https://github.com/dogtagpki/jss/actions/runs/5810230552/job/15794978022)
> that fails due to a conflict between dnf and dnf5 when using the rawhide
> docker image. I have been trying to keep up
Hello all,
I have a GitHub Action
(https://github.com/dogtagpki/jss/actions/runs/5810230552/job/15794978022) that
fails due to a conflict between dnf and dnf5 when using the rawhide docker
image. I have been trying to keep up with the dnf/dnf5 revert story, but I may
have missed something
