Re: liborigin FTBFS

2016-02-20 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > I think it is also good idea to update liborigin to 2.0 (it is something > like 2 years after current fedora version) That's why there is a liborigin2. As far as I can tell, they dropped support for older

Re: liborigin FTBFS

2016-02-20 Thread Igor Gnatenko
I think it is also good idea to update liborigin to 2.0 (it is something like 2 years after current fedora version) On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 12:41 PM Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks a bunch! > > There was also a > %patch1 -p1 > missing, but I figured that before

Re: liborigin FTBFS

2016-02-20 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Thanks a bunch! There was also a %patch1 -p1 missing, but I figured that before building the package. Now the package fails to build locally, but there is no problem in mock. I really need to read up more on gcc changes if I am to keep c++ packages under my care... -- devel mailing list

Re: liborigin FTBFS

2016-02-20 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 20/02/16 12:54 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: I don't get it, I applied the patch, but I'm seeing pretty much the same errors in mock and koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13054384 Sorry, the patch was not in the right format, not sure how that happened. This

Re: liborigin FTBFS

2016-02-20 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
I don't get it, I applied the patch, but I'm seeing pretty much the same errors in mock and koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13054384 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: liborigin FTBFS

2016-02-16 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 15/02/16 19:12 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: The problem is that the package defines a type 'function' in the global namespace, but also puts 'using namespace std;" in the global namespace, in a header.

Re: liborigin FTBFS

2016-02-15 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > The problem is that the package defines a type 'function' in the > global namespace, but also puts 'using namespace std;" in the global > namespace, in a header. That causes the 'function' struct and >

Re: liborigin FTBFS

2016-02-15 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 14/02/16 19:55 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Yesterday I was notified that liborigin failed to build in rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307729 The problem is that the package defines a type 'function' in the global namespace, but also puts 'using namespace std;"

liborigin FTBFS

2016-02-14 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hello, Yesterday I was notified that liborigin failed to build in rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307729 For the past couple of days I've been away on a work trip and I won't be back until the end of next week. Unless this failure messes someone else's packages, would it be