Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I know there are some reviews in progress for llvm3X packages, one of
> which may be for julia.
Ewww!!!
Are you also namespacing the symbols (using C++ namespaces)? If not, this is
a surefire recipe for symbol conflicts and thus crashes! Anything that ends
up directly
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:41 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Dave Johansen
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 21:00 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 21:00 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > On 9/20/15, David Airlie wrote:
> > > It's llvm, there is never a good time to upgrade it and no llvm
> release is
> > > backwards
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 21:00 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> > On 9/20/15, David Airlie wrote:
>> > > It's llvm, there
On 21/09/15 03:00 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> Given that we are now post-Beta for F23, it seems a little late in the
>> cycle to be introducing a new llvm runtime. Is it guaranteed to be
>> backwards-compatible?
> OTOH, having OpenGL 4 support in Fedora 23 (at least for certain cards) is a
> strong
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Given that we are now post-Beta for F23, it seems a little late in the
> > cycle to be introducing a new llvm runtime. Is it guaranteed to be
> > backwards-compatible?
>
> OTOH, having OpenGL 4 support in Fedora 23 (at
> Given that we are now post-Beta for F23, it seems a little late in the
> cycle to be introducing a new llvm runtime. Is it guaranteed to be
> backwards-compatible?
OTOH, having OpenGL 4 support in Fedora 23 (at least for certain cards) is a
strong marketing point. Personally I'm very much
On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 21:00 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On 9/20/15, David Airlie wrote:
> > It's llvm, there is never a good time to upgrade it and no llvm release is
> > backwards compatible.
>
> Yes, so unless someone is pretty familiar with LLVM upstream, keep
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephen Gallagher" <sgall...@redhat.com>
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Saturday, 19 September, 2015 1:17:45 AM
> Subject: Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23
>
> On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 00:16 -0400, David Airl
On 9/20/15, David Airlie wrote:
> It's llvm, there is never a good time to upgrade it and no llvm release is
> backwards compatible.
Yes, so unless someone is pretty familiar with LLVM upstream, keep
reading every changeset, no body can guarantee what will happen.
--
Yours
Le jeudi 17 septembre 2015 à 00:16 -0400, David Airlie a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> So I've been updating rawhide to llvm 3.7 upstream, so we can get
> OpenGL 4.1 support on the radeonsi GPUs.
>
> The two depends on llvm I don't control/know about were julia and
> pocl, I've done my best to make them
On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 00:16 -0400, David Airlie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I've been updating rawhide to llvm 3.7 upstream, so we can get
> OpenGL 4.1 support on the radeonsi GPUs.
>
> The two depends on llvm I don't control/know about were julia and
> pocl, I've done my best to make them work,
> pocl
On 09/16/2015 10:16 PM, David Airlie wrote:
Hi,
So I've been updating rawhide to llvm 3.7 upstream, so we can get OpenGL 4.1
support on the radeonsi GPUs.
The two depends on llvm I don't control/know about were julia and pocl, I've
done my best to make them work,
pocl I've rebased to git,
Hi,
So I've been updating rawhide to llvm 3.7 upstream, so we can get OpenGL 4.1
support on the radeonsi GPUs.
The two depends on llvm I don't control/know about were julia and pocl, I've
done my best to make them work,
pocl I've rebased to git, which seems to be upstream advice
julia I've
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:16 AM, David Airlie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I've been updating rawhide to llvm 3.7 upstream, so we can get OpenGL 4.1
> support on the radeonsi GPUs.
>
> The two depends on llvm I don't control/know about were julia and pocl, I've
> done my best to make
15 matches
Mail list logo