On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 6:29 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 06:34:16PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
> > > > Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS,
> > > > which have their
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 2:46 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-07-11 at 07:02 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 12:34 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
> > >
> > > Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 06:34:16PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
> > > Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS,
> > > which have their own somewhat different release/life cycles? What about
> > > module lifecycles?
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 08:52:28AM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 6:02 AM Josh Boyer
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 12:34 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
> > >
> > > Another - what do we do about, e.g.,
On Mon, 2022-07-11 at 07:02 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 12:34 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
> >
> > Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS,
> > which have their own somewhat different
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 6:02 AM Josh Boyer
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 12:34 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
> >
> > Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS,
> > which have their own somewhat different
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 12:34 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
>
> Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS,
> which have their own somewhat different release/life cycles? What about
> module lifecycles? What is it
> I am not excited, because I feel it doesn't add any value to Fedora.
It's not about adding "value", it's about making sure that people
realize that they are running unsupported software which no longer
receives updates and might have vulnerabilities, including remote.
Actually, any now
Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS,
which have their own somewhat different release/life cycles? What about
module lifecycles? What is it about*lifecycles* that's important,
anyway? Don't we maybe want to
Adam Williamson writes:
> On Thu, 2022-07-07 at 10:49 -0700, Stewart Smith via devel wrote:
>> We actually have a skeleton design for such a thing (it says what
>> updates and upgrades are available), but we've lagged on
>> both posting to devel@ that it's something we've been working on, and I
Josh Boyer writes:
> I really don't think encoding lifecycle information in the
> installation itself is the right approach, but it's perhaps the most
> tenable one for Fedora. However, until Fedora definitively moves to
> using independent lifecycles for their releases, this is a game of
>
On Thu, 2022-07-07 at 10:49 -0700, Stewart Smith via devel wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> > In https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2803 Artem asked for a user-visible
> > notification when a Fedora stops being supported. Various proposals
> > for online checks were discussed in the bug,
Kevin Kofler via devel writes:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> In https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2803 Artem asked for a user-visible
>> notification when a Fedora stops being supported. Various proposals
>> for online checks were discussed in the bug, but I think we might make
>> do with
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> In https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2803 Artem asked for a user-visible
> notification when a Fedora stops being supported. Various proposals
> for online checks were discussed in the bug, but I think we might make
> do with something much simpler.
We've been
On Mi, 06.07.22 21:05, Gary Buhrmaster (gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 3:45 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>
> > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/23924 proposes adding
> > SUPPORT_END=-MM-DD to /usr/lib/os-release.
>
> I like the concept, but
>
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 3:45 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/23924 proposes adding
> SUPPORT_END=-MM-DD to /usr/lib/os-release.
I like the concept, but
(warning, taxonomy discussion)
The announcement for os-release included
the
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> In https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2803 Artem asked for a user-visible
> notification when a Fedora stops being supported. Various proposals
> for online checks were discussed in the bug, but I think we might make
> do with something much simpler.
That will just
Hi,
On July 6, 2022 3:44:49 PM UTC, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>In https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2803 Artem asked for a user-visible
>notification when a Fedora stops being supported. Various proposals
>for online checks were discussed in the bug, but I think we might make
>do
Am 06.07.22 um 17:44 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
Hi,
In https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2803 Artem asked for a user-visible
notification when a Fedora stops being supported. Various proposals
for online checks were discussed in the bug, but I think we might make
do with something much
I'm in favor.
I'm not too concerned about updates to the EOL date post-release. Most
people won't be terribly upset if we actually EOL a week or two later
than advertised (now if we EOL before the advertised date, then we
have a problem). This proposal is a good step that doesn't require
much
Le 2022-07-06 18:04, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden a écrit :
I like the idea. It's very easy to use and because it's offline it
doesn't have any privacy considerations. The service can't be offline
either.
This idea is very elegant for offline systems with estimated SUPPORT_END
date initially
On 06/07/2022 17:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Inhttps://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2803 Artem asked for a user-visible
notification when a Fedora stops being supported.
+1. I like this idea.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 12:21 PM Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> On Mi, 06.07.22 18:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> > I'm aware of the release schedule ;)
> > The date would only need to be set (at most) twice:
> > - once before the release of Fn
> > - after Fn+2 is
On Mi, 06.07.22 18:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> I'm aware of the release schedule ;)
> The date would only need to be set (at most) twice:
> - once before the release of Fn
> - after Fn+2 is released and Fn has 1 month left
> (only if Fn+2 slipped)
>
> And it's
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 11:59:29AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 11:49 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 11:45 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > In https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2803 Artem asked for a user-visible
> > >
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 11:47:21AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 11:45 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
Hi,
In https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2803 Artem asked for a user-visible
notification when a Fedora stops being supported. Various proposals
for online checks were
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 11:49 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 11:45 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2803 Artem asked for a user-visible
> > notification when a Fedora stops being supported. Various proposals
> > for
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 11:45 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2803 Artem asked for a user-visible
> notification when a Fedora stops being supported. Various proposals
> for online checks were discussed in the bug, but I think we might make
> do
Hi,
In https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2803 Artem asked for a user-visible
notification when a Fedora stops being supported. Various proposals
for online checks were discussed in the bug, but I think we might make
do with something much simpler.
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/23924
29 matches
Mail list logo
