Re: provenpackager request: fix keepassx for f24

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Parag Nemade wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > See: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338054 > > > > Pushing a reasonable version of keepassx for f24 is apparently

Re: provenpackager request: fix keepassx for f24

The bug was rejected as a blocker but instead it has a suggestion to be a freeze exception. You should use official application to properly refile it as a freeze exception, there's no tracker bug number in the blocks box. FE has its own tracker. https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs -

Re: provenpackager request: fix keepassx for f24

On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 09:37 +0530, Parag Nemade wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > See: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338054 > > > > Pushing a reasonable version of keepassx for f24 is apparently an accepted > >

Re: provenpackager request: fix keepassx for f24

Hi, On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > See: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338054 > > Pushing a reasonable version of keepassx for f24 is apparently an accepted > freeze exception, but it hasn't happened. It would be rather unfortunate if

provenpackager request: fix keepassx for f24

See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338054 Pushing a reasonable version of keepassx for f24 is apparently an accepted freeze exception, but it hasn't happened. It would be rather unfortunate if f24 final was released before this was dealt with. Since fixing this is as simple as