Re: unicorn on s390x

2023-12-17 Thread Jerry James
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 12:18 PM Jerry James wrote: > With some architecture/gcc combinations, you have to link with > -latomic to get access to the 128-bit atomic functions. Upstream's > configure script assumes those functions are builtin or not present at > all. They need to check for a 3rd

Re: unicorn on s390x

2023-12-17 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 3:20 PM W. Michael Petullo wrote: > I maintain Fedora's unicorn package. This package will not presently > build on s390x, and I am not certain why. The problem seems to have to > do with 128-bit instructions. With some architecture/gcc combinations, you have to link with

Re: unicorn on s390x

2023-12-17 Thread Neil Hanlon
Hey Mike, I've forwarded this over to the Linux Distros working group [1] at the Open Mainframe Project and am also going to take a look to see what the deal is. Best, Neil [1] https://openmainframeproject.org/our-projects/working-groups/linux-distributions/ On 16.12.2023 16:20, W. Michael

unicorn on s390x

2023-12-16 Thread W. Michael Petullo
I maintain Fedora's unicorn package. This package will not presently build on s390x, and I am not certain why. The problem seems to have to do with 128-bit instructions. I have a tracker bug in Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223039 I have also added some commentary to a