Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

Awesome! Just a small note here, I'll add a desktop file for idle3 soon, there is already a bugzilla [0] for that. [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392049 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

koji failed to build srpm from scm

Hi, I am getting this error: > BuildError: error building srpm, mock exited with status 1; > see build.log for more information But there is no build.log :\ Both fedpkg mockbuild and fedpkg srpm work on local machine. Fails on koji for both f25 and rawhide. Is the problem on my machine or is

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

... The Workstation based lab will also contain: * Basic GNOME * Terminal emulator * Text editor * PDF reader * Web browser * Image viewer * ...and possibly other utilities In Workstation you can find the idle3 executable in /usr/bin but users will not note it because there is not a grafical

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

Just a small note here, I'll add a desktop file for idle3 soon, there is already a bugzilla [0] for that. [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392049 Regards, Charalampos Stratakis Associate Software Engineer Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat - Original Message - From:

Re: koji failed to build srpm from scm

Tom Hughes: > Yes there is: > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/5224/17545224/build.log > > Looks like the source is missing - did you upload it to the lookaside > cache? Thanks, the sources file did not have the source tarball entry. Jonny signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: koji failed to build srpm from scm

On 01/02/17 21:20, Jonny Heggheim wrote: I am getting this error: BuildError: error building srpm, mock exited with status 1; see build.log for more information But there is no build.log :\ Yes there is: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/5224/17545224/build.log Looks like the

Re: HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

Am 01.02.2017 um 18:59 schrieb Sandro Mani: Hi I'm about to fire off the libwebp and mingw-libwebp 0.6.0 updates, which include soname bumps. I'm rebuilding all of the dependent packages: darktable-2.2.2-1.fc26.src.rpm efl-1.18.4-2.fc26.src.rpm freeimage-3.17.0-8.fc26.src.rpm

Re: packaging work is becoming increasingly cumbersome

W dniu 01.02.2017 o 09:12, Lubomír Sedlář pisze: > Kevin Fenzi píše v Út 31. 01. 2017 v 16:19 -0700: >> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 23:26:29 +0100 >> Julian Sikorski wrote: >> >>> - chain-building has been broken for a month [2] so now requesting >>> each build in the chain separately

Re: HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

On 02/01/2017 06:59 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > I'm about to fire off the libwebp and mingw-libwebp 0.6.0 updates, which > include soname bumps. > > I'm rebuilding all of the dependent packages: Hi Sandro, Thanks for working on this! The number of packages affected by the soname bump is

Re: packaging work is becoming increasingly cumbersome

Kevin Fenzi píše v Út 31. 01. 2017 v 16:19 -0700: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 23:26:29 +0100 > Julian Sikorski wrote: > > > - chain-building has been broken for a month [2] so now requesting > > each build in the chain separately is required > > I just did a ping on that issue.

Re: Self Introduction: Darryl T. Agostinelli

Hello and welcome to Fedora! Charalampos Stratakis Associate Software Engineer Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat - Original Message - From: "Darryl T. Agostinelli" To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 5:30:28 AM Subject: Self

flatpak app launch script

Hi, I feel that launching a flatpak app from command line a bit regression from rpm packages. It's really different to type: $firefox or $flatpak run org.mozilla.Firefox Especially when "flatpak run org.mozilla" carries no information for user, they just want to launch the app and don't

Re: Offering to co maintain lv2 related packages (lv2, lilv, suil, serd, sord, sratom...)

> Il giorno 25 gen 2017, alle ore 10:57, Simone Caronni > ha scritto: > > Hello, > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Guido Aulisi > wrote: > Hello, > I recently joined the packager group and I made 2 audio

Orphaning rubygem-logging

Hi, I just updated and fixed rubygem-logging, but since I have no use for this package, I just orphaned it in PkgDb. Feel free to pick it up or let it go away ... Vít ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: Boost 1.63 rebuilds underway for f26

Am 01.02.2017 um 00:19 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: Am 30.01.2017 um 17:33 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: On 30/01/17 12:34 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am 27.01.2017 um 13:12 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: On 27/01/17 13:02 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am 27.01.2017 um 12:21 schrieb

F26 Self Contained Change: LDC 1.1.0

= Proposed Self Contained Change: LDC 1.1.0 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LDC1.1.0 Change owner(s): * Kalev Lember Update LDC to 1.1.0 in Fedora 26. == Detailed Description == The LDC D compiler has been lagging behind upstream in Fedora, making it difficult to build software that

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID

On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 13:13 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AnacondaLVMRAID > > Change owner(s): > * Vratislav Podzimek (Anaconda/Blivet) > * Heinz Mauelshagen (LVM) > > Use LVM RAID instead of LVM of top

Re: Rust SIG

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hello everybody, > > we are establishing new SIG for Rust[0]. Feel free to join us on IRC > (#fedora-rust) and/or Mailing List (r...@lists.fedoraproject.org). > > Help with improving our wiki page is very

Re: flatpak app launch script

On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 07:16 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 13:46 +0100, Martin Kolman wrote: > > Can you pass command line arguments like this ? For example > > inkscape > > can be used not only as a GUI app, but also from the command line > > to > > convert SVG files to

Re: flatpak app launch script

Hi! >> Hi, >> >> I feel that launching a flatpak app from command line a bit regression >> from rpm packages. It's really different to type: >> >> $firefox >> >> or >> >> $flatpak run org.mozilla.Firefox >> >> Especially when "flatpak run org.mozilla" carries no information for >> user, they

Re: Boost 1.63 rebuilds underway for f26

On 01/02/17 11:15, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am 01.02.2017 um 00:19 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: Am 30.01.2017 um 17:33 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: Thanks. Several of the boost rebuilds can't proceed until hdf5 is rebuilt. Your hdf5 build failed due to a known bug for ppc64le:

Re: Boost 1.63 rebuilds underway for f26

On 02/01/2017 12:44 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: On 01/02/17 11:15, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am 01.02.2017 um 00:19 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: Am 30.01.2017 um 17:33 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: Thanks. Several of the boost rebuilds can't proceed until hdf5 is rebuilt. Your hdf5 build failed

Re: Rust SIG

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Jan Synacek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Igor Gnatenko > wrote: >> Hello everybody, >> >> we are establishing new SIG for Rust[0]. Feel free to join us on IRC >> (#fedora-rust) and/or Mailing List

Re: flatpak app launch script

On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 13:46 +0100, Martin Kolman wrote: > Can you pass command line arguments like this ? For example inkscape > can be used not only as a GUI app, but also from the command line to > convert SVG files to PNG and other things. So it would be good if > flatpack can also support

Re: flatpak app launch script

- Original Message - > Hi, > > I feel that launching a flatpak app from command line a bit regression > from rpm packages. It's really different to type: > > $firefox > > or > > $flatpak run org.mozilla.Firefox > > Especially when "flatpak run org.mozilla" carries no information for

Re: flatpak app launch script

On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 10:05 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote: > Hi, > > I feel that launching a flatpak app from command line a bit > regression  > from rpm packages. It's really different to type: > > $firefox > > or > > $flatpak run org.mozilla.Firefox Can you pass command line arguments like

Re: per-product packaging question

On 01/31/2017 09:15 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > We should just install one default in the default location, We don't > want to document to users the difference > > During post install the content can be modified based on the package. > > Please do not do this. It will react badly to future

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

On 01/31/2017 02:29 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonClassroomLab > > Change owner(s): > * Miro Hrončok > * SIGs/Python > > > A new Python Classroom Lab will be created in 3

Re: Boost 1.63 rebuilds underway for f26

Am 01.02.2017 um 12:44 schrieb Tom Hughes: On 01/02/17 11:15, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am 01.02.2017 um 00:19 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: Am 30.01.2017 um 17:33 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: Thanks. Several of the boost rebuilds can't proceed until hdf5 is rebuilt. Your hdf5 build failed

Re: per-product packaging question

On 02/01/2017 09:58 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Given that this is never going to happen (we decided that changing the config > implicitly is a bad idea), I should update the policy to recommend using > copies > rather than symlinks and keeping the variant configs in /usr/share instead of >

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

On 1.2.2017 16:31, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 01/31/2017 02:29 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: = System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonClassroomLab Change owner(s): * Miro Hrončok * SIGs/Python A new Python

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2017-02-01)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: per-product packaging question

On 01/30/2017 05:03 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:00:34PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm looking at the per-product packaging doc at >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Per-Product_Configuration >> and I see that variants for all products are

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > What's the advantage here vs. providing a "Python Classroom Lab" install > target > in GNOME Software that allows you to turn any Fedora Workstation installation > into a Classroom Lab? > GNOME Software can't do

Fedora Rawhide-20170201.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 13/96 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386) ID: 55953 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL:

Maven downgrade to 3.3.9 in rawhide

Hi fellow packagers, In the beginning of this year, maven upstream announced [1] they dropped 3.4.0 release and reverted the changes made. We already had 3.4.0 snapshot in Fedora Rawhide, so this means we have to revert maven package back to version 3.3.9. [1]

Re: Boost 1.63 rebuilds underway for f26

Am 01.02.2017 um 15:13 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: Am 01.02.2017 um 12:44 schrieb Tom Hughes: On 01/02/17 11:15, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am 01.02.2017 um 00:19 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: Am 30.01.2017 um 17:33 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: Thanks. Several of the boost rebuilds

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:14:21PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > Who supports microdnf? Is that the dnf team or others? It is the DNF team. I have a hope that these will be fronted by a command called "yum" which will implement close-to-full compatibility with Yum Classic, and which will: 1.

Re: Fedora PSM2 build failures

On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 18:04:50 +0100 Jan Kurik wrote: > Hi Aravind, > > there was an upgrade of GCC to version 7 > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC7 . As I can not turn the > options off by my self, I am resending this to Release Engineering > mailing list to consider

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

On 02/01/2017 10:34 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: >> >> What's the advantage here vs. providing a "Python Classroom Lab" install >> target >> in GNOME Software that allows you to turn any Fedora Workstation installation

Re: per-product packaging question

On 02/01/2017 10:48 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > > On 02/01/2017 09:58 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 01/30/2017 05:03 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:00:34PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: Hi, I'm looking at the per-product packaging doc at

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

On 02/01/2017 10:34 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 1.2.2017 16:31, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 01/31/2017 02:29 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: >>> = System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab = >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonClassroomLab >>> >>> Change owner(s): >>> * Miro Hrončok >>> *

Re: per-product packaging question

On 02/01/2017 09:58 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 01/30/2017 05:03 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:00:34PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm looking at the per-product packaging doc at >>>

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image

>>> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image = >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ContainerMinimalImage >>> >>> Change owner(s): >>> * Dusty Mabe >>> >>> >>> Produce a new container image that contains as little as possible, but >>> also still provides the ability to

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image

On 01/31/2017 10:35 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: >> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ContainerMinimalImage >> >> Change owner(s): >> * Dusty Mabe >> >> >>

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image

On 01/31/2017 09:54 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:00:01AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ContainerMinimalImage >> >> Change owner(s): >> * Dusty Mabe >> >> >>

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

> On Jan 31, 2017, at 1:16 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 31.1.2017 09:13, Amit Saha wrote: >> Hello Jan, >> >> The Fedora Scientific spin already includes most of the Python 3 >> packages you are looking at. Is it worth looking at that instead of a >> new spin? I am

HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

Hi I'm about to fire off the libwebp and mingw-libwebp 0.6.0 updates, which include soname bumps. I'm rebuilding all of the dependent packages: darktable-2.2.2-1.fc26.src.rpm efl-1.18.4-2.fc26.src.rpm freeimage-3.17.0-8.fc26.src.rpm gd-2.2.4-1.fc26.src.rpm gdal-2.1.2-6.fc26.src.rpm

Re: packaging work is becoming increasingly cumbersome

On 02/01/2017 02:56 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> - fedpkg now needs authentication via kerberos instead of ssh key [3], >> which means that I now have to run kinit before starting a packaging >> session, in addition to firing up keepass and entering the password > > You can request a renewable

Dependency rebuild order

Hi Wondering if someone has some neat script which outputs the rebuild order of a set of packages, say after a library these depend on bumped its soname. Thanks Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: packaging work is becoming increasingly cumbersome

On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 10:05:50 -0800 Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Julian Sikorski > wrote: > > While I am sure these changes are done with an aim of improving > > things in the long run, the churn caused by them is really starting >

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID

Actually, I've got a concern about this feature. I'm not sure what gnome-shell depends on for monitoring mdadm arrays, but I know it will put up a notification if an mdadm member becomes faulty; because I've seen this notification. Maybe it's getting this information from udisksd? In any case,

Re: packaging work is becoming increasingly cumbersome

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: > While I am sure these changes are done with an aim of improving things > in the long run, the churn caused by them is really starting to take a > toll on my motivation. Could something be done to mitigate the >

Orphaning xlogin

Hi, because of lack of free time to actively maintan all of my packages with trying to give the same chances to all of them, I decided to orphan xlogin. Also, I don't use xlogin any more due to some issues with SELinux. Please feel free to pick the package up. I'll click the orphan button just

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 4:55 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Please ensure upgrades of systems using MD RAID are properly tested. Please help test upgrades if there's a layout you want to work. The only way anything gets tested is if someone does the test. > My server at

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 at 5:20 am, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > > > > On Jan 31, 2017, at 1:16 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > >> On 31.1.2017 09:13, Amit Saha wrote: > >> Hello Jan, > >> > >> The Fedora Scientific spin already includes most of the Python 3 >

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Python Classroom Lab

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 10:40:27AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Sure it can; you just create a metapackage that Requires/Recommends: > all of the members of the comps group and add AppData XML and a logo > to that metapackage. It would be nice to have a feature like this in Software where we

[Bug 1370756] perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370756 --- Comment #19 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1370756] perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370756 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1370756] perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370756 --- Comment #17 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99.001 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1370756] perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370756 --- Comment #18 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1246922 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1246922=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 695 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 458 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 176

[Bug 1418484] New: perl-Code-TidyAll-0.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418484 Bug ID: 1418484 Summary: perl-Code-TidyAll-0.56 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Code-TidyAll Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1415340] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415340 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1413323] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413323 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 574 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 568 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 500

[Bug 1418399] _WARN: Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at / usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Encode/MIME/Header.pm line 198

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418399 --- Comment #1 from Alex Regan --- Falling back to perl-Encode-2.86-3.fc25.x86_64 fixes the problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

jplesnik set the monitor flag of perl-libwww-perl to nobuild

jplesnik set the monitor flag of perl-libwww-perl to nobuild ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

pghmcfc uploaded DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.73.tar.gz for perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime

c259473e1120a9e40020cba2c7d008227521dbca0d2906878ee75e1ebc58e82760386bb32ebb1e987e68dfa4ce7f1e532dc4bfdf70467383425705e3f1c18d15 DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.73.tar.gz

dist.upgradepath FAILED for FEDORA-2017-6ec181884e

dist.upgradepath FAILED for FEDORA-2017-6ec181884e https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/6eccd262-e855-11e6-8954-5254008e42f6/task_output/FEDORA-2017-6ec181884e.log ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

dist.upgradepath FAILED for perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.08-1.fc24

dist.upgradepath FAILED for perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.08-1.fc24 https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/6eccd262-e855-11e6-8954-5254008e42f6/task_output/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.08-1.fc24.log ___ perl-devel mailing list --

jplesnik pushed to perl-libwww-perl (master). "6.17 bump"

From 2db6570290586001e300e3bd800b26524b77c755 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 10:15:52 +0100 Subject: 6.17 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-libwww-perl.spec | 7 ++- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8

[Bug 1418126] perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.73 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418126 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime (perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.73-1.fc26). "Update to 1.73 (..more)"

From 8e99b37e5309989bd23ffbae1baf90e8388fc148 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 10:30:42 + Subject: Update to 1.73 - New upstream release 1.73 - The format_datetime method now checks that the object it is given isa DateTime object

[Bug 1418127] perl-libwww-perl-6.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418127 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime (master). "Update to 1.73 (..more)"

From 8e99b37e5309989bd23ffbae1baf90e8388fc148 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 10:30:42 + Subject: Update to 1.73 - New upstream release 1.73 - The format_datetime method now checks that the object it is given isa DateTime object

jplesnik uploaded libwww-perl-6.17.tar.gz for perl-libwww-perl

55917bcab95169655a3921eb8cf10c179a766dede7ee93a800174367c754dee00da03825de5b43e79a1d4053bc3a51338570d43edc8327f2b91a1e8b41ca2c39 libwww-perl-6.17.tar.gz

[Bug 1418273] New: perl-Test2-Workflow-0.000018 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418273 Bug ID: 1418273 Summary: perl-Test2-Workflow-0.18 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test2-Workflow Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1418131] perl-MooX-Struct-0.014 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418131 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Scalar-Does (master). "0.203 bump"

From 60747a2d00bb96713f483ea21ed2805442fa197c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:39:06 +0100 Subject: 0.203 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + ...not-use-done_testing-with-Test-NoWarnings.patch | 44

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID

I would like the "User Experience" section to be fleshed-out a bit more. Currently it says "There should be no visible change for non-expert users. Expert users could make use of the new LVM RAID's features." I think, though, there's plenty of middle ground here: users who are not experts in LVM

jplesnik uploaded Scalar-Does-0.203.tar.gz for perl-Scalar-Does

698c5678c54f730dee96568853ba3e62c9bad4ae6157a134c0465d49068afdac039b3ab8319eba6f0c2c0634bfb7a58464a46bd1e8f2bf759d340dc2620d8419 Scalar-Does-0.203.tar.gz

[Bug 1418135] perl-Scalar-Does-0.203 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418135 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

F26 Self Contained Change: LDC 1.1.0

= Proposed Self Contained Change: LDC 1.1.0 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LDC1.1.0 Change owner(s): * Kalev Lember Update LDC to 1.1.0 in Fedora 26. == Detailed Description == The LDC D compiler has been lagging behind upstream in Fedora, making it difficult to build software that

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-3.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-3.fc26.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible.

jplesnik pushed to perl-MooX-Struct (master). "0.014 bump"

From d776aa565bd82ab1fb2492f4c3de3af6970a6057 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:53:20 +0100 Subject: 0.014 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + ...13-Add-return_value-dump-for-Data-Printer.patch | 33

jplesnik uploaded MooX-Struct-0.014.tar.gz for perl-MooX-Struct

44d477f59ea6c97d4a68793ece33c022a374342e55e072e9e0986d8cdfa4851146ae812ad6363c26284150dca184a9f7ae61b6784858d8e8d1563b80203c348b MooX-Struct-0.014.tar.gz

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.3()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.3 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-ZeroMQ

perl-ZeroMQ has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.ppc64le requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On

jplesnik uploaded Test2-Workflow-0.000018.tar.gz for perl-Test2-Workflow

38305ef3755008d016938f94aa9d3192fb3219b3769546c4eed5e002fe6b5a4780661698bf883b5780db9a5b87f95b80d840fcceadea2ef299509645e242c9bc Test2-Workflow-0.18.tar.gz

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel6 (2017-02-01)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel5 (2017-02-01)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[Bug 1418273] perl-Test2-Workflow-0.000018 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418273 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Test2-Workflow (master). "0.000018 bump"

From d712e9327a43f57fcf3584e61ebfd67e40df97da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 15:58:59 +0100 Subject: 0.18 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Test2-Workflow.spec | 8 +++- sources | 2 +- 3 files

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2017-02-01)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

smani pushed to perl-GD (master). "Rebuild (libwebp)"

From 3131a0d70d86a322fcd87c228462587e4802f71f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sandro Mani Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 19:27:40 +0100 Subject: Rebuild (libwebp) --- perl-GD.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/perl-GD.spec b/perl-GD.spec

[Bug 1418399] New: _WARN: Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at /usr/lib64/perl5/ vendor_perl/Encode/MIME/Header.pm line 198

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418399 Bug ID: 1418399 Summary: _WARN: Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Encode/MIME/Header.pm line 198 Product: Fedora

pghmcfc uploaded Math-GMP-2.14.tar.gz for perl-Math-GMP

aa3468fe49253562af74d8c8d8a0094b4f7dad32a07b5e99ed6fc4e7a090c560a8f38f5227e1b96abb59525e5b1fe4c3766dae01734a7de1f0c4938c05d6fe43 Math-GMP-2.14.tar.gz

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Math-GMP (master). "Update to 2.14 (..more)"

From dadeb7c5caf6b3cb6986f13aec6ff1eef7f88e34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 20:54:49 + Subject: Update to 2.14 - New upstream release 2.14 - Hopefully fix the GPG signature (CPAN RT#120062) --- perl-Math-GMP.spec | 6 +- sources

  1   2   >