No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210305.0):
ID: 801763 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210304.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210305.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 38
Dropped packages:7
Upgraded packages: 202
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 614.67 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi,
On 3/4/21 11:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 22:40 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>>> Starting from a minimal install with plymouth omitted, adding just
>>> plymouth itself pulls in 3 packages (plymouth, plymouth-core-libs,
>>> plymouth-scripts) with an installed size of
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210304.0):
ID: 800427 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Dnia Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 12:14:07PM -0800, Adam Williamson napisał(a):
> Starting from a minimal install with plymouth omitted, adding just
> plymouth itself pulls in 3 packages (plymouth, plymouth-core-libs,
> plymouth-scripts) with an installed size of 621K. Adding plymouth-
> system-theme
Is changing the default theme from "text" to "details" an option? It is already
there so there is no need to install another package and I think it is a better
wall-of-text experience than removing plymouth altogether.
--
Best Regards
Oğuz Ersen
___
On 3/4/21 5:11 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 3/4/21 11:50 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 3/3/21 6:11 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 3/2/21 5:20 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 3/2/21 4:25 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
Hi,
Ahh, okay.
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 9:31 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
sudo
On 3/4/21 9:11 PM, Tom Seewald wrote:
On rawhide I upgraded to authselect-1.2.2-3.fc35 yet I am still encountering
the issue of gdm repeatedly complaining about authentication via fingerprint.
I've checked and authselect is using the 'ssd' profile.
Can you please provide output of
An update again!
We've sent an email to folks that have an account in both Fedora & CentOS but
registered with different email addresses. If that's your case, please choose
one address for both accounts, it'll help us migrate.
We are now in the middle of the final sprint for production
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 07:50:11PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > I am not sure about this. What services are you seeing which are
> > extraneous? I do see ps aux is going on miles and miles, but of the 218
> > processes I see from startup time on my workstation, I see 165 of them are
> >
Le 04/03/2021 à 09:08, Remi Collet a écrit :
Hi,
I start working on PHP 8 for Fedora 35
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php80
PHP 8.0.3 will be shortly in rawhide
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6efb3c293c
FTBFS
-
#1934995swig
#1934996
OLD: Fedora-34-20210304.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210305.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Hi,
On 3/5/21 11:59 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 3/4/21 5:11 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 3/4/21 11:50 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
>>> On 3/3/21 6:11 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 3/2/21 5:20 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 3/2/21 4:25 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
>> Hi,
Hi,
On 3/5/21 1:56 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 07:50:11PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> I am not sure about this. What services are you seeing which are
>>> extraneous? I do see ps aux is going on miles and miles, but of the 218
>>> processes I see from
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210304.0):
ID: 800818 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/800818
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 34 RC 20210305.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/187 (x86_64), 12/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210304.n.0):
ID: 800577 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/800577
ID: 800610 Test: aarch64
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 12:56:57PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I think there's still plenty of stuff to improve that will apply everywhere.
> homed, alsactl, geoclue, colord just shouldn't need to be there all the time.
firewalld, too. For most users it's just putting a static
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:05:00PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > mcelog.service loaded active running
> > Machine Check Exception Logging Daemon
> This is another one for which it is questionable to have it running, or is
> this a machine with
> ECC RAM ? And
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210304.0):
ID: 800883 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/800883
ID: 800884 Test: aarch64
romulasry via devel 于2021年3月5日周五 下午2:04写道：
>
> Preferribly a git version with all packages would be nice
>
> Hope this is the right place to put this, if not what list, thanks in advance.
> https://www.coreboot.org/
Is coreboot intended to be shipped as part of distribution? I think it
should be
Hello,
there are several bugzillas wrt Python 2 usage in trac plugins maintained by
user jstanley with no response for a year and a half. I don't see any recent
packaging activity by Jon, do you know if they are still interested in their
Fedora packages?
Dnia Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 10:17:17AM -0500, Matthew Miller napisał(a):
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:05:00PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > mcelog.service loaded active running
> > > Machine Check Exception Logging Daemon
> > This is another one for which it is
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:12:34PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > > This is another one for which it is questionable to have it running, or
> > > is this a machine with
> > > ECC RAM ? And even then I'm not sure if it adds a lot of value, or if
> > > just like smartd it
> > > just logs some
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 02:31:14PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Sorry for jumping in late, I'm sporadically online while on parental
> leave (haven't been able to touch my laptop for the past few days!)
No need to be sorry. :) Congrats!
> Mass-branching does seem too different from
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 03:52:04PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 12:14:07PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > If you don't have plymouth installed, you get a very old-school "wall
> > of text" boot process; if there are encrypted system partitions, you
> > get a plain text
Hi Everyone,
If you would like to see this report and toggle to the section you are
most interested in, I would suggest visiting this link
https://hackmd.io/8iV7PilARSG68Tqv8CzKOQ?view and use the header bar
on your left to skip to where you want to go!
## Initiative FYI Links
Initiatives repo
> Can you please provide output of `authselect current`?
# authselect current
Profile ID: sssd
Enabled features:
- with-fingerprint
- with-silent-lastlog
# authselect check
Current configuration is valid.
I have verified that both sssd and fprintd are running, and are not logging any
errors.
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:02:54AM -, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
> An update again!
>
> We've sent an email to folks that have an account in both Fedora & CentOS but
> registered with different email addresses. If that's your case, please choose
> one address for both accounts, it'll help us
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:35:37AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:12:34PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > > > This is another one for which it is questionable to have it running, or
> > > > is this a machine with
> > > > ECC RAM ? And even then I'm not sure if it adds a
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 12:27 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 03:52:04PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 12:14:07PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > If you don't have plymouth installed, you get a very old-school "wall
> > > of text" boot process; if
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 01:11, romulasry via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Preferribly a git version with all packages would be nice
>
>
Are you proposing to do the work? Or are you looking for people to do the
work?
> Hope this is the right place to put this, if not what list,
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 10:03:31AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/4/21 11:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 22:40 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>
> >>> Starting from a minimal install with plymouth omitted, adding just
> >>> plymouth itself pulls in 3 packages
On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 17:20 +, Tom Seewald wrote:
> > Can you please provide output of `authselect current`?
> # authselect current
> Profile ID: sssd
> Enabled features:
> - with-fingerprint
> - with-silent-lastlog
>
> # authselect check
> Current configuration is valid.
>
> I have verified
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:12 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> there are several bugzillas wrt Python 2 usage in trac plugins maintained by
> user jstanley with no response for a year and a half. I don't see any recent
> packaging activity by Jon, do you know if they are still interested in
On 05. 03. 21 19:03, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:12 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
there are several bugzillas wrt Python 2 usage in trac plugins maintained by
user jstanley with no response for a year and a half. I don't see any recent
packaging activity by Jon, do you know
> Could you modify fprintd.service, to set G_MESSAGES_DEBUG=all[1] and
> then grab a log of that?
Here's what I see from systemctl status fprintd.service:
Getting authorization to perform Polkit action
net.reactivated.fprint.device.verify
Authorization granted to AuthenTec AES2550/AES2810 to
Hello everyone,My name is Alexey Gorgurov, and I would like to participate in the community life.I'm experienced mainly in C++, Qt, .net, python, etc., interested in Linux and have some experience in open source contributing.I like to help people with programming issues and like to spend some time
Just a heads up for anyone running rawhide and using swapfiles: There's
some nasty corruption in 5.12-rc1. ;(
https://lwn.net/Articles/848265/ has details.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list --
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 09:52:22PM +0300, Alex Fails wrote:
Welcome!
You may want to adjust your email client to include a plain/text part
for this list. :)
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list --
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 7:06 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Just a heads up for anyone running rawhide and using swapfiles: There's
> some nasty corruption in 5.12-rc1. ;(
Note it's only for swap files, not partitions or zram/zswap, so most
default Fedora use cases should be unaffected.
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Just a heads up for anyone running rawhide and using swapfiles: There's
> some nasty corruption in 5.12-rc1. ;(
Note that this corrupts not only the swapfile as hinted at in the subject,
but also random data and/or metadata on the entire containing partition!
This is
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 5:06 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Just a heads up for anyone running rawhide and using swapfiles: There's
> > some nasty corruption in 5.12-rc1. ;(
>
> Note that this corrupts not only the swapfile as hinted at in the subject,
> but also
Preferably someone else because I haven't done packaging on Fedora (or Linux)
for that matter. Just some minor editing of existing packages.
So I don't really think I am up for it.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Should be fine but they suggest a git version.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936048
Bug ID: 1936048
Summary: perl-HTTP-Message-6.29 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Message
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/06/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210306gite9b4eb594.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-Parser` that
you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Parser/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-Parser` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Parser/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935417
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935378
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935417
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-c620c81807 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c620c81807
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-PDF-API2` that
you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PDF-API2/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4657
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
55 matches
Mail list logo
