Re: Web Assembly on Fedora: interested in a Fedora SIG to work on this?

I am happy to join the group Now. I have a limited time, and more prioritized tasks in Fedora, but maybe I can help something for the SIG. -- Jun | He - Him | Timezone: UTC+1 or 2, Czech Republic See for the timezone.

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 5:58 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. [snip] > maven-scm mizdebsk, trawets For

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230119.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230118.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230119.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 7 Added packages: 12 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 163 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 6.73 MiB Size of dropped packages:

Rawhide updates stuck for the past ~4 hours?

My Rawhide Bodhi updates are stuck in pending, so I've checked https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?releases=F38 and it seems that everything created after 2023-01-20 17:35 UTC is stuck. Is this a natural slowdown due to the mass rebuild or is something broken? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone:

Re: Improving Fedora boot time when libvirt is installed

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023, at 11:53 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 2023-01-19 00:55, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> >> What you could do is split up the problem: have iscsi-starter.service >> or so, that is separate from the iscsi.service main service. The >> former's job would be to scan if iscsi

Re: When to close CVE's

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 4:47 PM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > such as yourself are contentious about > doing the right thing). Obviously that word should have been conscientious (I hate autocorrect). ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: When to close CVE's

On 1/20/23 10:48, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 9:22 AM Gary Buhrmaster > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 1:54 PM Richard Shaw wrote: >>> >>> So is it when a build is complete in Rawhide? Or must *ALL* active >> releases get the "fix"? >>> >> >> I am not sure it is official

Re: Rawhide updates stuck for the past ~4 hours?

On Fri, 2023-01-20 at 22:44 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > My Rawhide Bodhi updates are stuck in pending, so I've checked > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?releases=F38 > > and it seems that everything created after 2023-01-20 17:35 UTC is > stuck. > > Is this a natural slowdown due to

[Test-Announce] 2023-01-23 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2023-01-23 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat Greetings testers! It's time for the first meeting of 2023! Let's check in and see how everything's going. If anyone

SPDX office hours - Second Session

Hello. The owners of SPDX Change proposal want to have this Change as smooth as possible. And we decided to setup Office hours. Do you have any questions about SPDX migration? Do you hesitate about what steps you should take? How to proceed with your package? We will do our best to help you.

Re: When to close CVE's

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 2:29 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > My general rule is that a security fix is worth backporting a SONAME change > for, if there is no way to backport the patch. > In this case all the Fedora branches are recent enough but EL 7 and EL 8 are not and are impractical to

Re: When to close CVE's

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 1:54 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > So is it when a build is complete in Rawhide? Or must *ALL* active releases > get the "fix"? > I am not sure it is official policy/practice, but in theory I would think that the CVE is technically closed when all impacted Fedora releases

Re: New WASM related mailing list

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 6:23 PM Zuzana Svetlikova wrote: > > Hi all, > > as there has been an interest in creating WASM SIG, I moved on with it. > > You can already join our mailing list: wasm-...@lists.fedoraproject.org Thanks for the malling list! I just wanted to share the page to subscribe

Re: When to close CVE's

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 9:22 AM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 1:54 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > So is it when a build is complete in Rawhide? Or must *ALL* active > releases get the "fix"? > > > > I am not sure it is official policy/practice, but in > theory I would think

When to close CVE's

So is it when a build is complete in Rawhide? Or must *ALL* active releases get the "fix"? Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: When to close CVE's

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:54 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > > So is it when a build is complete in Rawhide? Or must *ALL* active releases > get the "fix"? > It depends on the severity of the CVE. For High severity ones it makes sense to fix in all active releases, less so for Medium/Low CVEs. hth

Re: When to close CVE's

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 3:48 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > I think in practical terms that makes sense but our tools don't really help. I agree, and that seems to be an artifact of the single Fedora component in RHBZ, which treats Fedora as one thing. I supposed (in theory again) that there could

Re: When to close CVE's

On 1/20/23 11:47, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: I agree, and that seems to be an artifact of the single Fedora component in RHBZ, which treats Fedora as one thing. I supposed (in theory again) that there could be a master bugzilla for the CVE which depends on child bugzillas for each impacted Fedora

Re: New WASM related mailing list

>> as there has been an interest in creating WASM SIG, I moved on with it. >> >> You can already join our mailing list: wasm-...@lists.fedoraproject.org Thanks for the malling list! I just wanted to share the page to subscribe to the WASM SIG.

Re: When to close CVE's

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 4:53 PM Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Small clarification: where you wrote 'component' you meant 'product' :-) > BZ has both Products and Components, forming two levels. RHEL 7/8/9 are > Products, on the same level as Fedora. Thanks. I suppose I should have actually checked

releng pushed to rpms/perl-namespace-sweep (rawhide). "Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2023-01-20 08:04:21 UTC From 9e722d85abc2b693536e847504845a8997ebff24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jan 20 2023 08:04:16 + Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

[Bug 2162566] perl-Function-Parameters-2.001004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162566 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 2162633] New: Upgrade perl-Date-Extract to 0.07

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162633 Bug ID: 2162633 Summary: Upgrade perl-Date-Extract to 0.07 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Date-Extract Status: NEW Component:

[Bug 2161894] Branch Request: perl-Net-GitHub for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161894 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-App-Command-cover] PR #1: Update license to SPDX format

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Dist-Zilla-App-Command-cover` that you are following: `` Update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-App-Command-cover/pull-request/1

[Bug 2162651] New: perl-Sub-Quote-2.006008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162651 Bug ID: 2162651 Summary: perl-Sub-Quote-2.006008 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Sub-Quote Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a884ce2c71 tor-0.4.7.13-1.el7 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-3ab686a79f singularity-ce-3.10.5-1.el7 The following builds have

[rpms/perl-Tangerine] PR #1: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Tangerine` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Tangerine/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel

[rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Test-Compile] PR #1: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Test-Compile` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Test-Compile/pull-request/1

[EPEL-devel] New EPEL KDE Proposal

I plan on making two changes to the current EPEL KDE Update Schedule.[1] ** First: EPEL 8 KDE Plasma Desktop is going to stay at the releases that they currently are at. We will backport major security fixes. Bugs and bugfixes will be best effort. But we will not do any across the board

[Bug 2162566] perl-Function-Parameters-2.001004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162566 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Function-Parameters-2.

[rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Test-Compile] PR #1: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Test-Compile` that you are following: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Test-Compile/pull-request/1

[EPEL-devel] Re: New EPEL KDE Proposal

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 2:44 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > I plan on making two changes to the current EPEL KDE Update Schedule.[1] > > ** First: EPEL 8 KDE Plasma Desktop is going to stay at the releases that > they currently are at. We will backport major security fixes. Bugs and > bugfixes

[Bug 2160057] perl-WWW-Curl-4.17-31.fc38 FTBFS: curlopt-constants.c:19:51: error: 'CURL_DEPRECATED' undeclared

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160057 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2160057] perl-WWW-Curl-4.17-31.fc38 FTBFS: curlopt-constants.c:19:51: error: 'CURL_DEPRECATED' undeclared

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160057 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- Built into f38-rebuild tag. This package will appear in F38 once the tag is merged into f38-candidate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 2162728] New: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230120 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162728 Bug ID: 2162728 Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230120 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases Keywords:

[rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-App-Command-cover] PR #1: Update license to SPDX format

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Dist-Zilla-App-Command-cover` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-App-Command-cover/pull-request/1

[rpms/tangerine] PR #1: Simplify build and install phases

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `tangerine` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Simplify build and install phases `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tangerine/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 2160057] perl-WWW-Curl-4.17-31.fc38 FTBFS: curlopt-constants.c:19:51: error: 'CURL_DEPRECATED' undeclared

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160057 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||CPAN 145992 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 2161894] Branch Request: perl-Net-GitHub for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161894 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2160057] perl-WWW-Curl-4.17-31.fc38 FTBFS: curlopt-constants.c:19:51: error: 'CURL_DEPRECATED' undeclared

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160057 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|emman...@seyman.fr |ppi...@redhat.com Status|NEW

[Bug 2162633] Upgrade perl-Date-Extract to 0.07

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162633 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Ralf

[rpms/tangerine] PR #1: Simplify build and install phases

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `tangerine` that you are following: `` Simplify build and install phases `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tangerine/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list

[rpms/perl-Alien-wxWidgets] PR #2: Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2

spot merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Alien-wxWidgets` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2 `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Alien-wxWidgets/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list

[rpms/perl-Wx] PR #2: Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2

spot commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2` that you are following: `` I manually applied this, since it went out of sync with the mass rebuild. I did notice that wxWidgets 3.2 doesn't seem to be in rawhide yet, you might want to make sure you get that in there quickly or

[rpms/perl-Wx] PR #2: Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2

spot closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Wx` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2 `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Tangerine] PR #1: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Tangerine` that you are following: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Tangerine/pull-request/1 ___

[rpms/perl-Wx] PR #2: Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2

swt2c commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2` that you are following: `` > I manually applied this, since it went out of sync with the mass rebuild. > > I did notice that wxWidgets 3.2 doesn't seem to be in rawhide yet, you might > want to make sure you get that in there

[Bug 2162740] New: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20230120 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162740 Bug ID: 2162740 Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20230120 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Module-CoreList Keywords: