Speaking of Wednesday's hackfest... thanks to all who attended. It was a
good session with worthwhile discussion and progress made on some ELN
packages - yeah!
It'd be great to get feedback from those who attended or wanted to but
couldn't on doing another one and timing (e.g., day of the
ok , so on report of 2023-05-01 , java-1.8.0-openjdk was orphaned by
releng , so it looks like in the previous to last report one maintainer
was removed from the packagers groups for inactivity, who was the
maintainer ?
On Mon, 2023-05-01 at 22:26 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following
On Thu, 18 May 2023 at 06:15, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> ok , so on report of 2023-05-01 , java-1.8.0-openjdk was orphaned by
> releng , so it looks like in the previous to last report one maintainer
> was removed from the packagers groups for inactivity, who was the
> maintainer ?
>
>
Looking at
* Jens-Ulrik Petersen:
> We have been building i386 packages for ghc and Haskell for a long
> time, but I think it is time to stop for Fedora 39. So as part of F39
> Haskell updates, I plan to disable 32bit ix86 builds across all the
> packages: I doubt anyone is still using them anyway.
I think
So subject kind of says it all, but to follow up, when I google Fedora
known good licenses I get this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#SoftwareLicenses
Which uses the old license identifiers, so there's that. And
licensecheck is a PITA because I have to always add
Hi all,
just for the record, I have pushed the new util-linux v2.39 to Fedora.
Here are the changes:
* Removed dependence on the deprecated libuser.
* Removed the util-linux-user subpackage. The chfn and chsh commands
have been moved to the main util-linux package.
* Enabled
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AwsCli
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
==
== Summary ==
No longer include `fedora-repos-modular` in default installations.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Petersen| Jens Petersen]]
* Email:
== Detailed Description ==
The main motivation for this change is to improve the everyday speed
of dnf experienced by Fedora users.
dnf invocations
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2023-05-19 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10449/
___
devel
We have been building i386 packages for ghc and Haskell for a long time,
but I think it is time to stop for Fedora 39. So as part of F39 Haskell
updates, I plan to disable 32bit ix86 builds across all the packages: I
doubt anyone is still using them anyway.
Jens
Hi,
I am orphaning rubygem-thread_safe and rubygem-atomic which used to be
dependency of rubygem-protobuf, which was recently also orphaned,
therefore I have no use for them. On top of that, they are retired
upstream and replaced by rubygem-concurrent-ruby.
Vít
OpenPGP_signature
Hi
There should be no problems from opentoonz packaging side, and if there
are, i'll deal with them ;)
Keep up the good work!
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 7:24 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:05:21AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki napsal(a):
> > > "dnf repoquery --srpm --whatrequires
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 8:01 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> So subject kind of says it all, but to follow up, when I google Fedora known
> good licenses I get this:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#SoftwareLicenses
>
> Which uses the old license identifiers, so there's that. And
Hello,
My name is Nicholas and I'm working this summer as an intern with Red
Hat. My primary objective this summer is to improve support for the
O3DE project (https://www.o3de.org/) in Fedora and eventually have it
packaged and available for install through the official repositories.
If anyone is
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 8:02 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> So subject kind of says it all, but to follow up, when I google Fedora known
> good licenses I get this:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#SoftwareLicenses
>
> Which uses the old license identifiers, so there's that. And
Hi,
I have orphaned rubygem-protobuf. It used to be required by
rubygem-cucumber-messages, but the package dropped its dependency on
rubygem-protobuf.
Regards,
Jarek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Hello everyone,
I hope this email finds everyone well. I’m here to introduce myself but also
ask for anyone who would be interested in helping me out on a fun side project
that me and my colleague, Teng, have planned. I’m Kaitlyn Abdo and I’m an
Associate Technical Marketing Manager at Red
Hello everyone,
I hope this email finds everyone well. I’m here to introduce myself but also
ask for anyone who would be interested in helping me out on a fun side project
that me and my colleague, Teng, have planned. I’m Kaitlyn Abdo and I’m an
Associate Technical Marketing Manager at Red
Hi,
I have orphaned rubygem-escape and rubygem-fattr, because I don't have
any use for these.
Vít
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi,
I have no use for rubygem-little-plugger, therefore I have orphaned the
package. It used to be dependency of rubygem-logging, which has be gone
for long time already.
Vít
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel
Jens-Ulrik Petersen writes:
> I have just now pushed fixes for all ghc*, so can you try to rebuild
> them again in your repo?
All succeeded :-)
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/djdelorie/libffi-3.4.4/builds/
___
devel mailing list --
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 12:14 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just for the record, I have pushed the new util-linux v2.39 to Fedora.
> Here are the changes:
>
> * Removed dependence on the deprecated libuser.
> * Removed the util-linux-user subpackage. The chfn and chsh commands
>
Hi Richard, You should be looking at the new documentation at
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/ for the list of approved
licenses. The old wiki page does have a note at the top to the new link,
but we should make it redirect automatically, so thanks for the
reminder! We do have a
On 5/18/23 16:30, Nicholas Frizzell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is Nicholas and I'm working this summer as an intern with Red
> Hat. My primary objective this summer is to improve support for the
> O3DE project (https://www.o3de.org/) in Fedora and eventually have it
> packaged and available for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207594
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203031
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203031
Bug 2203031 depends on bug 2207594, which changed state.
Bug 2207594 Summary: perl-POSIX is missing a dependency on perl(locale)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207594
What|Removed |Added
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
63 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e00c3d01e
cutter-re-2.2.0-1.el8 rizin-0.5.1-1.el8
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9191f31d36
python-waitress-1.4.3-1.el8
4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207594
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-5.36.1-497.fc39|perl-5.36.1-497.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203031
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Crypt-URandom-0.38-1.f |perl-Crypt-URandom-0.38-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208278
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ba899b9717
golang-1.19.6-1.el7
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-cd6dc8dccf
wordpress-5.1.16-1.el7
1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968
--- Comment #1 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
Sorry, I forgot about this review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072972
--- Comment #1 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
Sorry, I forgot about this review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072972
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968
--- Comment #2 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
@andr...@andreasvoegele.com Hi Andreas, could we update the spec file to the
last version of the module from CPAN?
Review:
Source file is ok
Summary is ok
License need to update license string to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072972
--- Comment #2 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
@andr...@andreasvoegele.com Hi Andreas, could we update to last version of
module from CPAN?
I was looking at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968 and the
issues in this are similar.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AwsCli
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
==
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 3:17 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> just a heads up that according to
> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhel-app-streams-life-cycle#rhel8_application_streams
> the Python 3.8 application stream will be retired in May 2023 (I suppose at
> the
== Summary ==
No longer include `fedora-repos-modular` in default installations.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Petersen| Jens Petersen]]
* Email:
== Detailed Description ==
The main motivation for this change is to improve the everyday speed
of dnf experienced by Fedora users.
dnf invocations
Hello folks,
just a heads up that according to
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhel-app-streams-life-cycle#rhel8_application_streams
the Python 3.8 application stream will be retired in May 2023 (I suppose at the
end).
$ repoquery -q --repo=epel8 --whatrequires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208279
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2168842
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208279
Bug ID: 2208279
Summary: perl-Module-CPANfile-1.1004-16.fc39 FTBFS:
t/from_prereqs.t fails with
perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements-2.142-1.fc39
Product: Fedora
On 18. 05. 23 13:25, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 3:17 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello folks,
just a heads up that according to
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhel-app-streams-life-cycle#rhel8_application_streams
the Python 3.8 application stream will be retired in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208278
Bug ID: 2208278
Summary: perl-Graphics-TIFF-19-4.fc39 FTBFS: t/1.t fails with
ImageMagick-7.1.1.8
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
On Thu, 18 May 2023 at 09:52, Jos de Kloe wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
Thank you very much for sending a detailed upgrade email to the list
covering why the upgrade is happening, etc.
> I think an update of the epel eccodes packages is needed, since ECMWF
> will be starting to generate data files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208278
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2168842
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208278
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||CPAN 148337
Status|NEW
Dear all,
I think an update of the epel eccodes packages is needed, since ECMWF
will be starting to generate data files soon that can only be accessed
using this version.
As stated on this page:
https://confluence.ecmwf.int/display/COPSRV/Implementation+of+IFS+cycle+48r1+for+CAMS
"To handle
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Unicode-Normalize`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.32 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Unicode-Normalize/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184385
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Date-ICal-2.680 is |perl-Date-ICal-2.681 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184385
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1965523
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1965523=edit
Update to 2.681 (#2184385)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184385
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Date-ICal-2.681-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101297653
--
You
Hello everyone,
I hope this email finds everyone well. I’m here to introduce myself but also
ask for anyone who would be interested in helping me out on a fun side project
that me and my colleague, Teng, have planned. I’m Kaitlyn Abdo and I’m an
Associate Technical Marketing Manager at Red
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-PathTools` that
you are following:
``
3.89 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PathTools/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 11:05:26AM +0200, Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote:
> Am 15.05.23 um 20:50 schrieb Jonathan Wright:
> > EPEL tracks RHEL, not clones.
> >
> > EPEL10 is likely to resolve this, however. Ref
> > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/epel-10-proposal
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208278
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-666098f732 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-666098f732
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208278
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Graphics-TIFF-19-5.fc3
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-PathTools` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
3.89 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PathTools/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-threads-shared` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.68 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-threads-shared/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Time-HiRes` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.9774 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Time-HiRes/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Unicode-Normalize` that you are following:
``
1.32 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Unicode-Normalize/pull-request/2
___
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-threads-shared`
that you are following:
``
1.68 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-threads-shared/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Time-HiRes` that
you are following:
``
1.9774 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Time-HiRes/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
63 matches
Mail list logo
