Hello I'm maintainer of torrent-file-editor package in
Fedora and author of torrent-file-editor application. My FAS is
ivanromanov. Some weeks ago I updated app and wanted to update my
package in Fedora but can't do this. Seems now I haven't access to my
package. I opened package on
On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 11:18:45PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 7/23/23 12:10, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 11:25:12AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>> If the system administrator wants to mount $UNCOMMONFS, they should be
> >>> able to do so without hassle,
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230723.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230724.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 13
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 45
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 6.32 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Dne 20. 07. 23 v 19:10 Paul Howarth napsal(a):
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:10:37 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 10. 07. 23 v 10:38 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi,
libtomcrypt
So this is the dependency chain:
libtomcrypt <= python3-crypto <= python3-beaker <= python3-mako
I raised
You probably got removed for inactivity, see
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UG3UOKBVJLUWZYEHWL52KPMITPEPEBNF/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hello I'm maintainer of torrent-file-editor package in
Fedora and author of torrent-file-editor application. My FAS is
ivanromanov. Some weeks ago I updated app and wanted to update my
package in Fedora but can't do this. Seems now I haven't access to my
package. I opened package on
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 5:10 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Richard Shaw wrote:
> > # FIXME This patch is completely meaningless in the context of C++.
> > # It is a workaround for a pyside2 build failure with Qt 5.15.9,
> > # pyside2 5.15.9, clang 16.0.1 --
On 6/29/23 09:55, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> The rpm integration doesn't technically require systemd-sysusers, we can
> write a script that calls useradd/groupadd instead. So for us it becomes
> a choice between writing that script or adding audit support to
> systemd-sysusers. Writing a script
I picked up the package back in December of '22 when it was orphaned. Ref
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/W5YHD4JSFGJQBZEUWS5KYFJHJSIWPZCD/
I'm happy to re-add you so I've added you back as an admin :)
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 8:31 AM Ivan
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 02:01:37PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:40:08AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > The problem is that Fedora 39 and RHEL 9.3 are fast approaching and,
> > if we don't do anything about this issue before then, a subset of
> > libvirt users will see
On 24/07/2023 14:40, Leigh Scott wrote:
You probably got removed for inactivity, see
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UG3UOKBVJLUWZYEHWL52KPMITPEPEBNF/
Looks like it: https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issue/36
Tom
--
Tom Hughes
Thanks. So how to restore myself to packager group?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:08:00PM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 04:51:38PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > You don't actually need to do any of this if you're using libguestfs,
> > because the worst that can happen is the filesystem will pwn the
> > kernel inside the
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 5:46 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 20. 07. 23 v 10:08 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
>
> > So everything has to be rewritten across the entire ecosystem to
> > work with it? Wow, who thinks that's a good idea? It took the
> > ecosystem long enough to migrate from the yum
Hi Folks,
I also need access to the packager group to claim maintainership.
Who could provide it to me?
I will probably take twincam.
Thanks again.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 11:45:26AM -0400, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 04:00:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > If I acquire a new USB flash stick I've never plugged in before, I
> > don't want it auto-mounting before I can wipe & reformat it.
>
> Honestly,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 04:51:38PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> You don't actually need to do any of this if you're using libguestfs,
> because the worst that can happen is the filesystem will pwn the
> kernel inside the KVM appliance (which is just a userspace process, so
> you can kill
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 11:58 AM Peter Robinson
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:46 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > "Only dead projects has stable API"
>
> You can evolve APIs with versioning to ensure backwards compatibility
> while also evolving the usecases.
>
Well, this is exactly the
Thanks. Open an issue https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/581.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 08:20:21AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:40:08AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > Now, since this is clearly not a libvirt-specific issue, I believe
> > this approach should be adopted across Fedora by way of these macros
> > (or
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:08:50AM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> I saw that libguestfs has a guestmount(1) tool, and I think this could be
> a potential solution. An exploit against the kernel FS driver would only
> grant access to a KVM guest, and the QEMU process can be tightly sandboxed
>
Am 23.07.23 um 09:35 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
On 22/07/2023 08:01, Matthew Garrett wrote:
1) Automounting of removable media exposes the kernel to a lot of
untrusted input
Disable automatic mount by default. Problem solved.
We use a whitelist approach here based
on usbguard
On 7/24/23 08:47, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 11:18:45PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> On 7/23/23 12:10, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 11:25:12AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> If the system administrator wants to mount $UNCOMMONFS, they
On Mon, Jul 24 2023 at 10:08:50 AM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
I saw that libguestfs has a guestmount(1) tool, and I think this
could be
a potential solution. An exploit against the kernel FS driver would
only
grant access to a KVM guest, and the QEMU process can be tightly
sandboxed
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:38:03 -
"Julio Faracco" wrote:
> I also need access to the packager group to claim maintainership.
> Who could provide it to me?
> I will probably take twincam.
I'm not a packager, but these are some links to official information on
how to become a Fedora packager.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 02:22:48PM -, Ivan Romanov via devel wrote:
> Thanks. So how to restore myself to packager group?
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/#returning
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jul 23 2023 at 11:18:45 PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
Then the mount needs to be done in a sandbox, such as a KVM guest or
sandboxed userspace process.
Hmmm... I don't think traditional sandboxing accomplishes anything
here, because we're trying to protect against kernel bugs,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:08:50AM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 7/24/23 08:47, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 11:18:45PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >> On 7/23/23 12:10, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 11:25:12AM -0400, Neal
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 04:00:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> If I have a USB flash stick I plug in every day, it shouldn't ask me
> about that after the first time I use it.
Based on this "threat model" all an attacker has to do then is
snag/modify/replace your existing drive and then
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 06:45:12AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 02:01:37PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:40:08AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > The problem is that Fedora 39 and RHEL 9.3 are fast approaching and,
> > > if we don't do
On 7/23/23 7:22 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 2:01:34 AM EDT Matthew Garrett wrote:
A discussion within Debian again brought up the problem that:
1) Automounting of removable media exposes the kernel to a lot of
untrusted input
2) Kernel upstream are not terribly concerned
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 02:08:25PM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> Personally I would have preferred to call this a new tool versus trying to
> use dnf name still. It makes it clearer that the break is going to happen.
I propose "qzw". It's so easy to type on a qwerty keyboard layout.
Hi all,
I've multiple reports of FTBFS in the packager-dashboard, but I can
see many of the packages are being built fine in koschei/koji.
Is there a known issue on refreshing koschei data?
Kind regards,
Mikel
___
devel mailing list --
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 13:10, James Ralston wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 5:46 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> > Dne 20. 07. 23 v 10:08 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> >
> > > So everything has to be rewritten across the entire ecosystem to
> > > work with it? Wow, who thinks that's a good idea? It
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Any progress on this? I can submit a BZ ticket for tracking if needed.
A pull request would be easier, then I would just have to hit a button. :-)
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
That would make for somedifficult verbal conversations. What do you
propose for the phonetic version? :D
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 3:43 PM Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 02:08:25PM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > Personally I would have preferred to call this a new tool
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> A bit in the superblock marks the filesystem as clean or dirty, and
> that has nothing to do with whether it is malicious.
You mean we cannot rely on https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3514.txt for this?
;-)
Kevin Kofler
Hi all,
Per the Fedora Linux f39 schedule [1] we started a mass rebuild for
Fedora Linux f39 on 2023-07-19. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora Linux f39
for:
- No default fedora-repos-modular
- GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2)
- Make DNF5 The Default
- Make
On 7/24/23 10:00 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:08:50AM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
...
I still believe that mounting should _not_ be automatic, though, because
it could have side-effects (such as replaying the FS journal) that might
not be wanted. To prevent
Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 11:58 AM Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>> You can evolve APIs with versioning to ensure backwards compatibility
>> while also evolving the usecases.
>
> Well, this is exactly the case, isn't it? You have dnf4/dnf5, all nice and
> versioned.
It is
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 9:31 PM Samyak Jain wrote:
>
> The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f39-rebuild) and moved over to
> f39.
So it's over?
> Things still needing rebuilding
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f39-need-rebuild.html
Is it up to the packagers to
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Please do bump and rebuild it.
It's done:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103849749
> Although it would be nice to figure out why it didn't get a
> commit/build.
Indeed.
___
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:13:44PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 9:31 PM Samyak Jain wrote:
> >
> > The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f39-rebuild) and moved over to
> > f39.
>
> So it's over?
Yes. "was done".
> > Things still needing rebuilding
On 7/24/23 15:11, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 7/23/23 7:22 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
>> On Saturday, July 22, 2023 2:01:34 AM EDT Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> A discussion within Debian again brought up the problem that:
>>>
>>> 1) Automounting of removable media exposes the kernel to a lot of
>>>
Hi all,
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:54:43AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> Like many of you, I have been quite inconvenienced because of
> dnf5-related breakage of fedora-review. I've been monkeying with it
> today and finally got a successful run of fedora-review after making
> the following
On 24-07-2023 20:30, Samyak Jain wrote:
21426 builds have been tagged into f39, there are currently 1017 failed builds
that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be
filed shortly.
Will all the Python packages that failed during the Python3.12 mass
rebuild and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224548
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225081
Bug ID: 2225081
Summary: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.38 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219564
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2224548
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219564
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Mail-Box-3.010-1.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224548
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2219564
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219564
Bug 2219564 depends on bug 2224548, which changed state.
Bug 2224548 Summary: Upgrade perl-Mail-Box to 3.010
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224548
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224548
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||CPAN 147485
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221511
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
yselkowitz commented on the pull-request: `Update test requirements` that you
are following:
``
Thanks, no new rawhide build needed.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Meta-Check/pull-request/1
___
yselkowitz opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-CPAN-Meta-Check` that you are following:
``
Update test requirements
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Meta-Check/pull-request/1
___
pghmcfc commented on the pull-request: `Update test requirements` that you are
following:
``
Do you need a new build for this in Rawhide, or is fixing it in git sufficient?
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Meta-Check/pull-request/1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854
--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth ---
This appears to be related to valgrind 3.21.0 rather than Perl 5.38. I did a
mock build, keeping the chroot, then "mock ... --remove valgrind" and then
"mock ... --install
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-Meta-Check` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update test requirements
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Meta-Check/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219483
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Doc Type|---
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-LWP-Protocol-https` that you are following:
``
6.11 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-LWP-Protocol-https/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing
Hi all,
Per the Fedora Linux f39 schedule [1] we started a mass rebuild for
Fedora Linux f39 on 2023-07-19. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora Linux f39
for:
- No default fedora-repos-modular
- GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2)
- Make DNF5 The Default
- Make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224866
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|emman...@seyman.fr |p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218713
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219043
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-LWP-Protocol-https`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.11 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-LWP-Protocol-https/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224456
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219862
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-IO-Interactive-1.025-1 |perl-IO-Interactive-1.025-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219862
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-IO-Interactive-1.025-1 |perl-IO-Interactive-1.025-1
71 matches
Mail list logo
