https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268805
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:43 PM, gil wrote:
> Hi
> again thanks
> no all jsonld-java-tools dependencies are all available in rawhide
> org.openrdf.sesame: and in F23 only jsonld-java
> with fedora-review -b 1267890 --plugins Java -m fedora-rawhide-i386
> should work ...
I had
Am 01.12.2015 um 22:15 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:57:53PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 28/11/15 20:05 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:24:21AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
= System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift =
Does this
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:15:38PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:57:53PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On 28/11/15 20:05 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:24:21AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > >>= System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost
Hi,
I'm new here and followed the instructions for adding a new package.
I have submitted a ticket for my first package and looking for a review and
a sponsor.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286539
Let me know if I'm missing something.
Thanks,
Roi
--
devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285909
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:57:53PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 28/11/15 20:05 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:24:21AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> >>= System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift =
> >
> >Does this mean "upgrade" or "update"?
>
> I just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287360
Bug ID: 1287360
Summary: perl-Gtk3-0.026 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Gtk3
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: berra...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287360
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1101190
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1101190=edit
[patch] Update to 0.026 (#1287360)
--
You are
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
773 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893
libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
538 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626
puppet-2.7.26-1.el5
387
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287093
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287096
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287356
Bug ID: 1287356
Summary: perl-Gtk2-1.2497 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Gtk2
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287356
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1101185
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1101185=edit
[patch] Update to 1.2497 (#1287356)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276894
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287364
Bug ID: 1287364
Summary: perl-Log-Report-1.10 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Log-Report
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276894
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1101194
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1101194=edit
[patch] Update to 4.022 (#1276894)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287364
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1101193
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1101193=edit
[patch] Update to 1.10 (#1287364)
--
You are
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
268 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
164 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6813
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el7
71
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286831
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287093
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Config-Validator-1.3-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287096
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Config-Generator-0.9-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287368
Bug ID: 1287368
Summary: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl-0.22 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287331
Bug ID: 1287331
Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.52 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Date-Manip
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287352
Bug ID: 1287352
Summary: perl-Locale-Codes-3.37 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Locale-Codes
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287352
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1101174
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1101174=edit
[patch] Update to 3.37 (#1287352)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287361
Bug ID: 1287361
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-6.34 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287361
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1101191
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1101191=edit
[patch] Update to 6.34 (#1287361)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287367
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1101198
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1101198=edit
[patch] Update to 1.17 (#1287367)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287368
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1101199
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1101199=edit
[patch] Update to 0.22 (#1287368)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287367
Bug ID: 1287367
Summary: perl-Parallel-ForkManager-1.17 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Parallel-ForkManager
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287371
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1101204
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1101204=edit
[patch] Update to 0.033 (#1287371)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287371
Bug ID: 1287371
Summary: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.033 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287382
Bug ID: 1287382
Summary: perl-Tie-Simple-1.04 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Tie-Simple
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287382
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1101220
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1101220=edit
[patch] Update to 1.04 (#1287382)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287352
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12025813
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287361
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12025889
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287367
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12025932
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276894
--- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12025897
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287382
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12026160
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=129724
Fedora End Of Life changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543660
Fedora End Of Life changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543660
--- Comment #22 from Fedora End Of Life ---
Fedora 21 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-12-01. Fedora 21 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287390
Bug ID: 1287390
Summary: perl-Sereal-3.009 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Sereal
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287390
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1101228
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1101228=edit
[patch] Update to 3.009 (#1287390)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287391
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1101229
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1101229=edit
[patch] Update to 3.009 (#1287391)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287392
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1101230
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1101230=edit
[patch] Update to 3.009 (#1287392)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287392
Bug ID: 1287392
Summary: perl-Sereal-Encoder-3.009 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Sereal-Encoder
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287391
Bug ID: 1287391
Summary: perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.009 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Sereal-Decoder
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287391
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12026221
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006931
--- Comment #9 from Fedora End Of Life ---
Fedora 21 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-12-01. Fedora 21 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003631
Fedora End Of Life changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003631
--- Comment #7 from Fedora End Of Life ---
Fedora 21 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-12-01. Fedora 21 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006931
Fedora End Of Life changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006
Fedora End Of Life changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006
--- Comment #23 from Fedora End Of Life ---
Fedora 21 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-12-01. Fedora 21 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287390
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12026215
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
On Ter, 2015-12-01 at 16:44 +, Dave Love wrote:
> What's the correct way to write a spec file that obeys the %license*
> stipulation but also works for epel6?
>
> Some time ago I was told to follow
> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/411 and write
>
> %{!?_licensedir:%global license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997645
Fedora End Of Life changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997645
--- Comment #17 from Fedora End Of Life ---
Fedora 21 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-12-01. Fedora 21 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287360
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12025885
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287364
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12025895
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287368
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12025938
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287356
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12025867
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287371
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12025955
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287392
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12026227
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=129724
--- Comment #10 from Fedora End Of Life ---
Fedora 21 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-12-01. Fedora 21 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Randy Barlow wrote:
This sounds overall pretty neat to me! One detail came to my mind: how
would this interact with VPN DNS servers? In my experience with VPNs,
it's common for them to provide a DNS server that allows internal host
resolution to work. Would this local
I need a review for this package:
mathicgb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287183
Let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Dave Love wrote:
> What's the correct way to write a spec file that obeys the %license*
> stipulation but also works for epel6?
>
> Some time ago I was told to follow
> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/411 and write
>
>
= Proposed F24 System Wide Change: Node.js 4.2 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodeJS4x
Change owner(s):
* Stephen Gallagher
* Jared Smith
Fedora 24 will be updated to Node.js 4.2, the latest LTS release of
the platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building
fast,
What's the correct way to write a spec file that obeys the %license*
stipulation but also works for epel6?
Some time ago I was told to follow
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/411 and write
%{!?_licensedir:%global license %%doc}
and that now also appears in
Hi Jerry,
Take!
can you take this for me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267890 ?
Thanks
Regards
- gil
Il 01/12/2015 18:29, Jerry James ha scritto:
I need a review for this package:
mathicgb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287183
Let me know what I can review for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284141
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284141
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20151120-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284138
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.46-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287446
Bug ID: 1287446
Summary: perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin needs rebuild for new krb5-libs
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin
Severity: urgent
Assignee:
Hello Neal,
> On Wednesday, 2 December 2015 1:03 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> For example, when I'm at work, I can access hostA.work.com
> where resolving hostA only works by talking to dnsserverA.work.com,
> which was setup by the usual dhcp and then when I'm at home
>
> google.com is resolved as
jplesnik set the monitor flag of perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Have you imported your FAS SSL certificate in Firefox?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_the_Koji_build_system#The_web_interface
Anyway, for canceling tasks I found more straightforward the use of
commandline:
"koji cancel-task 12024149"
Mattia
Il 02/12/2015 05:52, gil ha scritto:
hi
I
Since the old proposal to have the bootloader automatically enumerate
boot options never went anywhere, can we do the next best thing?
Specifically, these days grub2-mkconfig appears to produce output
that's functionally identical to what grubby generates. Can we switch
new-kernel-pkg to just
hi
I tried to log in to stop
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12024149 but it
failed with the following error using Firefox on Fedora 23
koji.fedoraproject.org. Il peer SSL ha rifiutato il certificato
considerandolo revocato. (Codice di errore: ssl_error_revoked_cert_alert)
Il 02/12/2015 05:52, gil ha scritto:
hi
I tried to log in to stop
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12024149 but it
failed with the following error using Firefox on Fedora 23
koji.fedoraproject.org. Il peer SSL ha rifiutato il certificato
considerandolo revocato. (Codice
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166064
Bug 1166064 depends on bug 1166762, which changed state.
Bug 1166762 Summary: CVE-2010-5312 cacti: jquery-ui: XSS vulnerability in
jQuery.ui.dialog title option [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166762
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166041
Bug 1166041 depends on bug 1166762, which changed state.
Bug 1166762 Summary: CVE-2010-5312 cacti: jquery-ui: XSS vulnerability in
jQuery.ui.dialog title option [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166762
What
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:42 AM, gil wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
> Take!
> can you take this for me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267890
> ?
Will do. It seems this package depends on other packages that have
not yet been built in Rawhide. I can build them myself,
What would the chances be of updatng perl-IO-Socket in EL-6? imapsync
recently grew a dependency on IO::Socket::IP and won't work without it
anymore. I'd like to not have to retire it in EL-6.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 30/11/15 17:53,
Richard Shaw writes:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Dave Love wrote:
>
>> What's the correct way to write a spec file that obeys the %license*
>> stipulation but also works for epel6?
>>
>> Some time ago I was told to follow
>>
I think in order to make dnssec/local resolver the default, it should be
required to work for a naive user who works in a changing environment such
as:
moving between work, which has it's own private dns and
home, which has usual, public dns
without that user needing to understand anything
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Dave Love wrote:
>
> Sorry, I don't understand. What do I need to get _licensedir defined
> appropriately so that the conditional makes sense (per the chopped part
> of my message)?
%{!?_licensedir:%global license %doc}
%license COPYING
Il 01/12/2015 19:57, Jerry James ha scritto:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:42 AM, gil wrote:
Hi Jerry,
Take!
can you take this for me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267890
?
Will do. It seems this package depends on other packages that have
not yet been built
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284141
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2015
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284141
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20151120-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:19:04AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 10:09:58PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> FWIW, I'm not sure that's really true. The fedora-review tool makes it
> very easy to do a low-effort review and still produce a pretty
> checklist.
>From 4c61e2c8f8424bd690a6360613431b44666236c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 09:38:11 +0100
Subject: 4.00 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-podlators.spec| 32
We are using RedHat Bugzilla to track all bugs which happens in DNF,
dnf-plugins-core, dnf-plugins-extras. So please choose right component
in https://bugzilla.redhat.com and file a bug. We will be happy to
help with it.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Igor Gnatenko
http://dnf.readthedocs.org/en/latest/command_ref.html#autoremove-command-label
dnf autoremove will just remove dependencies which is not used by
another packages.
BTW you can ignore removing non-used packages for one transaction
using option --setopt=clean_requirements_on_remove=false
On Tue,
Hello Vit,
> On Tuesday, 1 December 2015 1:45 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > If I am not mistaken, this is at least 3rd time this change is proposed.
> Can somebody post some short summary what was changed, that you believe
> it will be successful this time?
True, it was postponed couple of times
On 30/11/15 17:53, notificati...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
nb requested branch el6 for package perl-IO-Socket-IP
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-IO-Socket-IP/
Note that IO::Socket::IP requires Socket >= 1.97 and EL-6 has Socket 1.82.
Paul.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
>From 8234ad6e74fb07a960a397aa6f4c0ae623dd92a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 11:32:30 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.002003
- New upstream release 1.002003
- Document how to use booleans
---
perl-JSON-MaybeXS.spec | 8 ++--
sources
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo