Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires

Re: Improvements of Fedora Sponsorship process

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we had > > very interesting follow-up discussion. > > > > We come up with

Re: Improvements of Fedora Sponsorship process

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Parag Nemade wrote: > Right not for all SIGs but at least for those where its possible. Just > see there are many such common pattern named packages are waiting in > queue for their package review. I can think of some patterns like > perl,

Re: Improvements of Fedora Sponsorship process

Hi, On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On 08/05/2016 10:31 AM, Parag Nemade wrote: >>> b) fedora-review is run automatically by some bot/script just after review >>> have been submitted. >> >> Can a new utility be written for this as I don't think

Re: Pending ACLs

Hi, On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, wrote: > Sometimes a maintainer doesn't want to approve ACLs for "reasons" but > doesn't want to reject the request for various reasons including the > requestor re-request of denied requests. > To add few things here, 1) Why do we need

Re: Can I request update of mock with fedora-25 configurations ?

On Sáb, 2016-08-06 at 20:40 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > After Fedora 25 Mass Branching , should be mock update with fedora- > > 25 > > configurations  ? > > Other question where I should ask it ? bugzilla ? > bugzilla +1 Thanks, 

Re: Can I request update of mock with fedora-25 configurations ?

Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hello, > After Fedora 25 Mass Branching , should be mock update with fedora-25 > configurations ? > Other question where I should ask it ? bugzilla ? bugzilla +1 -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Redefinition of the primary and secondary architectures

Peter Robinson wrote: > There will be a slight change that a failure in an arch won't cancel > the other arches and each one will run to completion (pass/fail) but > the overall primary task will still fail. I don't see how wasting Koji resources on completing an already failed build helps

Re: Redefinition of the primary and secondary architectures

Peter Robinson wrote: > We are planning to change the way Alternate Architectures (non x86_64) > are handled in terms of "primary" vs "secondary". Let me repost here what I already posted at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1592#comment:14 There, I wrote: | IMHO, it is entirely

Re: Bodhi UI Redesign User Survey

rkolathu wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > Thanks for the feedback > > It will be great if you could share your thoughts on improving the > interface. It will be useful for incorporating that into our survey > which ultimately will benefit the re-design process. On my relation to Bodhi: I've been

WwSww

Sent from my iPhonesA -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Can I request update of mock with fedora-25 configurations ?

Hello,  After Fedora 25 Mass Branching , should be mock update with fedora-25 configurations  ?  Other question where I should ask it ? bugzilla ?  Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Improvements of Fedora Sponsorship process

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 09:32:28AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we > had very interesting follow-up discussion. So I kinda missed it, since for some reason, i tought this was about financial sponsorship. (Given that I forgot

[Bug 1364730] New: DKIM signing of originating mail stopped working after upgrade from 2.10.1-5 to 2.11.0-3

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364730 Bug ID: 1364730 Summary: DKIM signing of originating mail stopped working after upgrade from 2.10.1-5 to 2.11.0-3 Product: Fedora Version: 24 Component: amavisd-new

Re: Pending ACLs

On 08/06/2016 05:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 03:48:36PM +0100, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 08:41:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know >>> what they are supposed to

Re: Pending ACLs

Sometimes a maintainer doesn't want to approve ACLs for "reasons" but doesn't want to reject the request for various reasons including the requestor re-request of denied requests. Dennis On August 5, 2016 3:34:58 PM GMT+02:00, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote: >I have a strong

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime (perl-DateTime-1.35-1.fc26). "Update to 1.35 (..more)"

This commit already existed in another branch. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-DateTime.git/commit/?h=perl-DateTime-1.35-1.fc26=fd8c4d5e019d0466888e76727d411aac114ceaad -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime (perl-DateTime-1.35-1.fc25). "Update to 1.35 (..more)"

From fd8c4d5e019d0466888e76727d411aac114ceaad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:33:22 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.35 - New upstream release 1.35 - Use namespace::autoclean in all packages that import anything; without cleaning the

Re: fortran

On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 15:26:12 - ba...@laposte.net wrote: > Hello, > > i use fortran in my university : is it possible to have the last GNU > fortran (version 6) integrated in the spin distribution ! > gcc-gfortran package (6.1.x on >=f23)? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Pending ACLs

On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:23:31 +0100 Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 04:36:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I've checked again just now, and I still don't see those ACLs. > > My guess is that it's a PkgDB bug and for this reason I'm trying to >

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime (f25). "Update to 1.35 (..more)"

From fd8c4d5e019d0466888e76727d411aac114ceaad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:33:22 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.35 - New upstream release 1.35 - Use namespace::autoclean in all packages that import anything; without cleaning the

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime (master). "Update to 1.35 (..more)"

From fd8c4d5e019d0466888e76727d411aac114ceaad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:33:22 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.35 - New upstream release 1.35 - Use namespace::autoclean in all packages that import anything; without cleaning the

pghmcfc uploaded DateTime-1.35.tar.gz for perl-DateTime

db8f0c5d0d8109c026ba4722a842edc9 DateTime-1.35.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-DateTime/DateTime-1.35.tar.gz/md5/db8f0c5d0d8109c026ba4722a842edc9/DateTime-1.35.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing

Re: Pending ACLs

On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 10:26:36AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati > wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote: > >> I have a strong opinion over this > >> > >> All the ACL's should be

Re: Pending ACLs

On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 04:36:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I've checked again just now, and I still don't see those ACLs. My guess is that it's a PkgDB bug and for this reason I'm trying to get in touch with Pingou. Cheers, Fale -- Fabio Alessandro Locati Red Hat - Senior Consultant

Re: Pending ACLs

On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 03:48:36PM +0100, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 08:41:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know > > what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably: > > > >

fortran

Hello, i use fortran in my university : is it possible to have the last GNU fortran (version 6) integrated in the spin distribution ! bests regards -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Redefinition of the primary and secondary architectures

>>> On the subject of RISC-V, I'm still plugging away at this. It's >>> rather slow going, but you can take a look at: >>> >>> http://git.annexia.org/?p=fedora-riscv.git;a=summary >>> >>> There is nothing much usable at the moment, and many stumbling blocks. >> >> >> Yes, but this is an

Re: Pending ACLs

On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 08:41:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know > what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/ > > However I visited the

Penging ACLs - 06 Aug 2016

Hello everyone, As promised in the previous email thread, I've updated my db with today dump and I've improved the query to exclude watchbugzilla and watchcommits reuqests. Please take care of your ACL requests! You should be able to see those in:

Re: Pending ACLs

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote: > I have a strong opinion over this > > All the ACL's should be accepted, doesn't matter the level. > And why i think of this ? > > Two simple reasons: > - The packager abandoned the package, because several reasons, and

Re: Fedora IRC channels on FreeNode

On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 07:24:51 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:29:19PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 22:10:14 +0100 > > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > > > I might have imagined this, but I'm sure I read

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires

[Test-Announce] Fedora 25 Branched 20160806.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 25 Branched 20160806.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Fedora IRC channels on FreeNode

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:29:19PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 22:10:14 +0100 > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > I might have imagined this, but I'm sure I read that the Fedora > > Project reserves all/some #fedora-* channels on FreeNode. > > > > Anyway if