On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> By the way, this isn't true at all. Most packages can and, these days,
>> are encouraged to ship their own SELinux policies.
>
> This is also a plague because it drags in SELinux dependencies
Hi Digimer
Thanks for your valuable advice and guidance. :D
I am good at C programming, HTML and know the basics of MySQL. I am hoping
to learn more through the open source. Basically I am not well aware of the
areas where I can get started. I am ready to contribute in even the
smallest of the
Adam Williamson wrote:
> By the way, this isn't true at all. Most packages can and, these days,
> are encouraged to ship their own SELinux policies.
This is also a plague because it drags in SELinux dependencies that would
not otherwise be necessary on a system with SELinux disabled. E.g.,
Christian Dersch wrote:
> Autokarma just means the package will not be pushed automatically, but
> karma mechanism is still active. So once your update reached the stable
> karma level you defined, you can hit the push to stable button.
This may be true for Firefox because it is a critpath
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
563 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
557 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
488
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414771
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Devel-Timer-0.10-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7ed8182779
--
You are receiving this mail
From c6bffc1d24b4262788a7567bb8eaaabb69d4fc07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denis Fateyev
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 04:56:58 +0600
Subject: perl-Devel-Timer: version 0.10
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Devel-Timer.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414771
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
dfateyev's perl-Devel-Timer-0.10-1.fc26 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=835496
--
You are receiving this mail
From c6bffc1d24b4262788a7567bb8eaaabb69d4fc07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denis Fateyev
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 04:56:58 +0600
Subject: perl-Devel-Timer: version 0.10
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Devel-Timer.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files
9fa4744315becb7a41514aec809509803ceb1f965875e7adb0c2c2783da4996dc7634cc63afaceec9a8696fd67a2af92e7b3e4dbc613708155182143e19fc22b
Devel-Timer-0.10.tar.gz
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Kai Engert wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-01-21 at 15:47 +0100, Christian Dersch wrote:
>> On 01/21/2017 03:44 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
>> >
>> > Autokarma just means the package will not be pushed automatically, but
>> > karma mechanism is still active.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408627
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984185
--- Comment #8 from Harald Reindl ---
> I would like to see analysis of slowdown of Perl
> examples and also all major components before we
> start changing partial relro into full relro
security first
"grep" become
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984185
Harald Reindl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|18 |24
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984185
Harald Reindl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
On 21/01/17 12:20 PM, Sarthak Gupta wrote:
> Hi
> I am new here and I want to contribute to open source. Can someone
> please guide me. :)
This is a surprisingly big question, despite being short. :)
"Open source" covers an absolutely huge range of projects and interests.
I would suggest you
Hi
I am new here and I want to contribute to open source. Can someone please
guide me. :)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 01/21/2017 04:15 PM, Kai Engert wrote:
I've disabled autokarma.
Thanks :)
The current Firefox 50.x will go unsupported on Tuesday, replaced by Firefox 51.
Usually new important security fixes are contained in the new Firefox update.
Unless we want to delay Firefox 51, this update must
On Sat, 2017-01-21 at 15:47 +0100, Christian Dersch wrote:
> On 01/21/2017 03:44 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
> >
> > Autokarma just means the package will not be pushed automatically, butĀ
> > karma mechanism is still active. So once your update reached theĀ
> > stable karma level you defined,
On 01/21/2017 03:44 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
On 01/21/2017 03:25 PM, Kai Engert wrote:
With autokarma disabled, is there a minimum test duration, before it
can get
pushed to stable?
Because we probably want to have it pushed to stable on Monday.
Autokarma just means the package will
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Kai Engert wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-01-21 at 13:20 +0100, Christian Dersch wrote:
>> > > The combined updates have been submitted to testing:
>> > > F24: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-bbb320ba18
>> > > F25:
On 01/21/2017 03:25 PM, Kai Engert wrote:
With autokarma disabled, is there a minimum test duration, before it can get
pushed to stable?
Because we probably want to have it pushed to stable on Monday.
Autokarma just means the package will not be pushed automatically, but
karma mechanism is
On Sat, 2017-01-21 at 13:20 +0100, Christian Dersch wrote:
> > > The combined updates have been submitted to testing:
> > > F24: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-bbb320ba18
> > > F25: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e42b513012
> > >
> > > If you can, please
On 01/21/2017 01:17 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Kai Engert wrote:
>> On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 10:22 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>>> Please just make sure they all get released in the same Bodhi update to
>>> avoid breakage.
>>
>> The combined
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Kai Engert wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 10:22 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>>
>> Please just make sure they all get released in the same Bodhi update to
>> avoid breakage.
>
>
> The combined updates have been submitted to testing:
> F24:
On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 10:22 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> Please just make sure they all get released in the same Bodhi update to
> avoid breakage.
The combined updates have been submitted to testing:
F24: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-bbb320ba18
F25:
26 matches
Mail list logo