Re: Rename of boost-python to python2-boost

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:54:24PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 12/09/17 18:41 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote: > >On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > >>>Was this package rename discussed anywhere? > >>> > >>>I don't think it makes any sense. It's not a python package,

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 13:06 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 09/11/2017 10:49 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Why the updated version of gjs 1.49 was not released yet? F27+ users > > apparently still fight gjs crashes: > > It needs mozjs52 that we don't have in Fedora yet. Well, also, we're in Beta

Fedora Rawhide-20170912.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 24/128 (x86_64), 3/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170910.n.0): ID: 141075 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso

Re: Kernel 4.13 rebase plans

On 12 Sep 2017 10:49 pm, "Laura Abbott" wrote: On 09/05/2017 09:41 AM, Laura Abbott wrote: > Hi, > > Kernel 4.13 was released this past weekend. This kernel has been > built for rawhide and is building for F27 as well. We will be > following the same upgrade procedure as in

[Bug 1491074] perl-TeX-Encode-2.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491074 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-TeX-Encode-2.003-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21830499

[Bug 1491074] New: perl-TeX-Encode-2.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491074 Bug ID: 1491074 Summary: perl-TeX-Encode-2.003 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-TeX-Encode Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1491074] perl-TeX-Encode-2.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491074 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1325091 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1325091=edit [patch] Update to 2.003 (#1491074) -- You are

[Bug 1490372] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000077 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490372 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1491070] New: perl-Mojolicious-7.46 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491070 Bug ID: 1491070 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-7.46 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mojolicious Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1491068] New: perl-MCE-1.830 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491068 Bug ID: 1491068 Summary: perl-MCE-1.830 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MCE Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: p...@city-fan.org

[EPEL-devel] EPEL Steering Committee Meeting for 1800 UTC 2017-09-13

There will be a meeting of the EPEL SCO tomorrow. The agenda is pretty loose so we can try to improve it for next week. #startmeeting EPEL (2017-09-13) #meetingname EPEL #topic aloha #chair avij bstinson Evolution nirik smooge #topic Announcements #info CentOS-7.4 issues #info ??? #topic FLOCK

[Bug 1487801] perl-Date-Manip-6.60 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487801 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1484857] perl-Net-GitHub-0.90 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484857 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: Rename of boost-python to python2-boost

On 12/09/17 18:41 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote: On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Was this package rename discussed anywhere? I don't think it makes any sense. It's not a python package, as the name python2-boost would suggest. Hi, yes, it was discussed on fedora-devel@

Re: Rename of boost-python to python2-boost

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Was this package rename discussed anywhere? I don't think it makes any sense. It's not a python package, as the name python2-boost would suggest. Hi, yes, it was discussed on fedora-devel@ and python@ for a few weeks. An announcement

Re: Kernel 4.13 rebase plans

On 09/05/2017 09:41 AM, Laura Abbott wrote: Hi, Kernel 4.13 was released this past weekend. This kernel has been built for rawhide and is building for F27 as well. We will be following the same upgrade procedure as in the past. F25 and F26 will get rebased to 4.13 after a few stable releases,

Re: Build failures on armv7hl with "No such file or directory"

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Jerry James wrote: > I looked through the armv7hl build log for sip errors or warnings and > found this: > > sip: src/scidavis.sip:175: ::Column::replaceValues() unsupported > function argument type - provide %MethodCode and a C++ signature

Re: Removing myself from packages in pagure?

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:53:26PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: >> I would like to remove myself from being a co-maintainer for various >> packages. I cannot find a way to do it in pagure, nor am I able to >> locate

Re: Build failures on armv7hl with "No such file or directory"

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Thanks Phil, but I don't think this applies in my case. Had I > forgotten to declare a dependency, the build would fail on all arches > and not only armv7hl. Plus, that thread and another one about a >

Re: rpmlint and rpmdevtools upstream help welcome

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote: > Hello, > > I don't have the time I'd like to have to participate in all my Fedora > related activities these days. Therefore, the rpmlint and rpmdevtools > upstream projects would benefit from more manpower. Anyone

Re: rpmlint and rpmdevtools upstream help welcome

On Tue 12. Sep 2017 at 20:59, Ville Skyttä wrote: > Hello, > > I don't have the time I'd like to have to participate in all my Fedora > related activities these days. Therefore, the rpmlint and rpmdevtools > upstream projects would benefit from more manpower. Anyone

Re: getting kernel-devel added

On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 18:03 +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:49:38 -0400 > Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:35:08AM -0400, Ben Williams wrote: > > > case A) Students are using Fedora on windows in a VM (Vbox in > > > this > > >

Re: Build failures on armv7hl with "No such file or directory"

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Phil K wrote: > > Did you search the upstream mailing list? Try this: > > SciDAVis / Discussion / Help & Tips:compile issues on suse > > SciDAVis / Discussion / Help & Tips:compile issues on suse Thanks Phil, but I don't think this applies in

Re: Rename of boost-python to python2-boost

On 12/09/17 19:48 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 06:56:02PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: Was this package rename discussed anywhere? I don't think it makes any sense. It's not a python package, as the name python2-boost would suggest. Hi, yes, it was

Re: Removing myself from packages in pagure?

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:53:26PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > I would like to remove myself from being a co-maintainer for various > packages. I cannot find a way to do it in pagure, nor am I able to > locate instructions for doing that in wiki. I cannot access /settings > for those projects,

Re: rpmlint and rpmdevtools upstream help welcome

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:57:41PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > https://pagure.io/rpmdevtools As I use rpmdevtools a lot, I added myself. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog:

Re: Build failures on armv7hl with "No such file or directory"

Did you search the upstream mailing list?  Try this: SciDAVis / Discussion / Help & Tips:compile issues on suse | | | SciDAVis / Discussion / Help & Tips:compile issues on suse | | | On Tuesday, September 12, 2017 3:52 PM, Alexander Ploumistos

Build failures on armv7hl with "No such file or directory"

Hello, I have a package under review[0], that I realized had python scripting support disabled, so I enabled it. Before that, it built fine in rawhide on all arches[1]. After enabling it (which involves python obviously and at least sip) the build failed only on armv7hl[2], because a file that

Re: Rename of boost-python to python2-boost

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 06:56:02PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Was this package rename discussed anywhere? > > I don't think it makes any sense. It's not a python package, as the > name python2-boost would suggest. Hi, yes, it was discussed on fedora-devel@ and python@ for a few weeks. An

Re: getting kernel-devel added

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:35:50 + From: "Klosowski, Przemek (Fed)" Subject: Re: getting kernel-devel added To:"devel@lists.fedoraproject.org" Message-ID:<1d935df8-f710-94a2-cda0-afa670dee...@nist.gov> Content-Type:

[Test-Announce] Fedora 27 Branched 20170912.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 27 Branched 20170912.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Removing myself from packages in pagure?

On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 21:53 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to remove myself from being a co-maintainer for various > packages. I cannot find a way to do it in pagure, nor am I able to > locate instructions for doing that in wiki. I cannot access /settings > for those

rpmlint and rpmdevtools upstream help welcome

Hello, I don't have the time I'd like to have to participate in all my Fedora related activities these days. Therefore, the rpmlint and rpmdevtools upstream projects would benefit from more manpower. Anyone interested? https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint

Removing myself from packages in pagure?

Hello, I would like to remove myself from being a co-maintainer for various packages. I cannot find a way to do it in pagure, nor am I able to locate instructions for doing that in wiki. I cannot access /settings for those projects, because I don't have sufficient rights (I get "Forbidden: You

[389-devel] Please review 48085: CI tests - replication cl5 tests

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48085 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/d93ce51aca0b788c2bdcf3f1c8b05455eb85a31dca02d9280a5c7a61f98e1a25-0001-Replication-cl5-tests.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Rename of boost-python to python2-boost

Was this package rename discussed anywhere? I don't think it makes any sense. It's not a python package, as the name python2-boost would suggest. It installs a shared library, libboost_python2.so, which is a library of C++ symbols that implement the Boost.Python C++ library. Why is

[389-devel] Jenkins build is back to normal : COMMIT_SANITY_TEST #37

See ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

spot pushed to perl-Email-Simple (master). "2.214"

From c9d5a9a97092e6bec81b9f53cbad4b621caf93ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Sep 12 2017 16:50:40 + Subject: 2.214 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index a8f593b..0651b60 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -6,3 +6,4 @@

spot uploaded Email-Simple-2.214.tar.gz for perl-Email-Simple

0a2b721b48e621c3cda2453934943dad0b779c30aa20821536f189f2d1c02512ec0451b8273ebef2618b42741cf72b59a6b6e7fbe4db2b1891f436815ed7c117 Email-Simple-2.214.tar.gz

spot pushed to perl-File-Which (master). "1.22"

From 3d60d1724c688689783a5df03fadbf6a6d562278 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Sep 12 2017 16:48:33 + Subject: 1.22 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index dfcc494..071c7a8 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@

spot uploaded File-Which-1.22.tar.gz for perl-File-Which

9efd8cc6d08e82a429ab3b0ec5193cb894432311338dc4cdcb73b4536a40bf4829c414e75e5dcb0d03b9190511b232f1d27e441657afa7299b0a5b882877f2d1 File-Which-1.22.tar.gz

[Bug 1490888] perl-TeX-Encode-2.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490888 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

spot pushed to perl-TeX-Encode (master). "2.002"

From def844b0c3ff3e064cfc8aba44518bd2ea02d417 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Sep 12 2017 16:40:51 + Subject: 2.002 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 6c5bf58..b4f402c 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@

spot uploaded TeX-Encode-2.002.tar.gz for perl-TeX-Encode

7caeae38557c4624036460529ae3b931eda92fb60e6768b6828a5db4c50b6643c8637a1f02c0980d51f6a96f75b9b38fd5e40b7268ee50bd15845dbf1152d898 TeX-Encode-2.002.tar.gz

Re: getting kernel-devel added

On 09/12/2017 11:35 AM, Ben Williams wrote: They used the F26 release so now have the release kernel and so they install sudo dnf install kernel-devel and still have issues (kernel and kernel-devel versions do not match). You're saying that they need to reboot, because kernel-devel update

[389-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: COMMIT_SANITY_TEST #36

1cfca.fc25.x86_64.rpm 389-ds-base-devel-1.3.7.4-20170912gitfe1cfca.fc25.x86_64.rpm 389-ds-base-snmp-1.3.7.4-20170912gitfe1cfca.fc25.x86_64.rpm Preparing... Updating / installing... 389-ds-base-libs-1.3.7.4-201709

Re: Testing graphical applications inside mock fails

> Thank you for your detailed answer! > > > The error messages about drm device are gone if I manually create the > character file > inside the chroot. However the original issue remains the same. Tried a GTK > application > easystroke however and that seems to work fine even without a drm

Re: A less "bloated" KDE spin

On 11 September 2017 at 14:19, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 07:17:56PM -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote: >> > While you (and others) may well know the name of the software you

Re: getting kernel-devel added

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:49:38 -0400 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:35:08AM -0400, Ben Williams wrote: > > case A) Students are using Fedora on windows in a VM (Vbox in this > > case) for a class. they are required for said class to install the > >

Re: getting kernel-devel added

On 9/12/17 10:49 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:35:08AM -0400, Ben Williams wrote: >> case A) Students are using Fedora on windows in a VM (Vbox in this >> case) for a class. they are required for said class to install the >> guest additions. they are constantly running

Re: getting kernel-devel added

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:35:08AM -0400, Ben Williams wrote: > case A) Students are using Fedora on windows in a VM (Vbox in this > case) for a class. they are required for said class to install the > guest additions. they are constantly running into errors that the > guest addidions will not

[389-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: COMMIT_SANITY_TEST #35

70912gitfe1cfca.fc25.x86_64.rpm 389-ds-base-debuginfo-1.3.7.4-20170912gitfe1cfca.fc25.x86_64.rpm 389-ds-base-devel-1.3.7.4-20170912gitfe1cfca.fc25.x86_64.rpm 389-ds-base-snmp-1.3.7.4-20170912gitfe1cfca.fc25.x86_64.rpm Preparing... Updating

Re: Testing graphical applications inside mock fails

Thank you for your detailed answer! > Short answer: > > # mknod /dev/dri/card0 c 226 0 The error messages about drm device are gone if I manually create the character file inside the chroot. However the original issue remains the same. Tried a GTK application easystroke however and that seems

getting kernel-devel added

hello This is an issue i am seeing with new users: I was at a University installfest this weekend and this was the major issues for Endusers. case A) Students are using Fedora on windows in a VM (Vbox in this case) for a class. they are required for said class to install the guest

Re: Fedora 27 Beta blocker status mail #1

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! Time for an update on the Fedora 27 Beta status. > > tl;dr action summary > > > Accepted blockers > - > > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489164 >

Fedora 27 Beta blocker status mail #1

Hi folks! Time for an update on the Fedora 27 Beta status. tl;dr action summary Accepted blockers - 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489164 ACTION: QA to test and karma update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fee0766883

Re: Testing graphical applications inside mock fails

On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 12:35 +, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to test graphical application inside mock chroot > environment as documented on Fedora wiki [1], but I am unable to do > that successfully. In addition to that instructions I've installed > mesa-dri-drivers and

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 48081 - CI test - password

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48081 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/fbee362e98a949d6366cafc66b26a198d024b2f798bf8b70cc7e4a8507bbf94f-0001-Issue-48081-CI-test-password.patch signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ 389-devel

Testing graphical applications inside mock fails

Hi, I am trying to test graphical application inside mock chroot environment as documented on Fedora wiki [1], but I am unable to do that successfully. In addition to that instructions I've installed mesa-dri-drivers and mesa-libGL inside the chroot as there were messages about missing files.

[Bug 1490888] perl-TeX-Encode-2.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490888 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-TeX-Encode-2.002-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1490888] New: perl-TeX-Encode-2.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490888 Bug ID: 1490888 Summary: perl-TeX-Encode-2.002 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-TeX-Encode Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1490888] perl-TeX-Encode-2.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490888 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1324858 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1324858=edit [patch] Update to 2.002 (#1490888) -- You are

[389-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: COMMIT_SANITY_TEST #34

-libs-1.3.7.4-20170912git5c2fa96.fc25.x86_64.rpm 389-ds-base-debuginfo-1.3.7.4-20170912git5c2fa96.fc25.x86_64.rpm 389-ds-base-devel-1.3.7.4-20170912git5c2fa96.fc25.x86_64.rpm 389-ds-base-snmp-1.3.7.4-20170912git5c2fa96.fc25.x86_64.rpm Preparing... ###

Re: Python 3 porting Bugzilla guidance

Hi Troy, On 09/12/2017 02:36 AM, Troy Curtis Jr wrote: Do I surmise correctly that Bugzilla tickets are only to be created if there is a packaging issue preventing python3 "compliance", and not if  upstream needs to be updated first to support? That is correct, we usually create Bugzilla

Re: Raising requirement for application icons in GNOME Software

On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 08:12:22PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > Hi all, > > At the moment the appstream-builder requires a 48x48px application > icon[1] to be included in the AppStream metadata. I'm sure it's no > surprise that 48x48 padded to 64x64 and then interpolated up to > 128x128 (for

[389-devel] Please review: Issue #77 - Fix changelogdb param issue

Hi team, please, review: https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/77 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/486d6f41143e829fde00c722747e95d4ad03efafd0680b1e78f1c95ec693c3c0-0001-Issue-77-Fix-changelogdb-param-issue.patch Thanks, Simon signature.asc Description: PGP signature