Self Introduction: Madison Kelly (digimer)

2017-10-05 Thread Digimer
Hello, I'm fairly new to packaging. I helped maintain the 'cluster' package some years back, but haven't done packaging since it was retired when F16 went EOL. I'm lead developer of the Anvil! Intelligent Availability platform, a fully open source "smart" high availability cluster appliance

[Bug 1497010] perl-Log-Any-1.701 is available

2017-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497010 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1497672] perl-MP3-Info-1.25 is available

2017-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497672 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1497917] perl-Locale-MO-File-0.08 is available

2017-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497917 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1496793] perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.033 is available

2017-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496793 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

System Upgrade F26 -> F27 Fails

2017-10-05 Thread Garry T. Williams
System upgrade re-boot fails with Error in `/usr/libexec/system-python' free() invalid pointer Upgrade failed at reboot. System rebooted to F26 successfully. I did two other systems without any problems. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1499101 -- Garry T. Williams

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2017-10-05 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 820 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 814 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 704

[Bug 1495026] perl-File-Fetch-0.54 is available

2017-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495026 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-File-Fetch-0.54-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1494826] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170923 is available

2017-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494826 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170923-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1494820] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.38 is available

2017-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494820 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.38-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1493797] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.36 is available

2017-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493797 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.38-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1493804] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170920 is available

2017-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493804 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170923-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

portingdb

2017-10-05 Thread Troy Curtis Jr
What is the story with the python3 portingdb instance ( http://fedora.portingdb.xyz/)? It's been down for quite a while now. Troy ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[389-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: NIGHTLY #100

2017-10-05 Thread mareynol
See -- [...truncated 4467 lines...] tickets/ticket49073_test.py:2: in from lib389.tasks import * E ImportError: No module named lib389.tasks _ ERROR

Fedora 27-20171005.n.0 compose check report

2017-10-05 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 12/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171004.n.0): ID: 152482 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic URL:

[Bug 1436460] perl-Log-Any-1.049 is available

2017-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436460 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Test-Announce] Fedora 27 Branched 20171005.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2017-10-05 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 27 Branched 20171005.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

[389-devel] Please review: Raise min tls version to 1.2

2017-10-05 Thread William Brown
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49395 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/0af22a1dea2fb06b9a3445ea7a98255be89406fcf3e065308511aac5db9ac35c-0001-Ticket-49395-Raise-min-TLS-version-to-1.2.patch -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane

Re: Kernel 4.13 rebase plans

2017-10-05 Thread James Hogarth
On 2 October 2017 at 03:26, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El vie, 22-09-2017 a las 15:25 -0500, Michael Catanzaro escribió: > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Chris Adams > > wrote: > > > On what grounds? There is nothing in the Fedora guidelines that > > >

Bodhi now has a "batched" request state

2017-10-05 Thread Randy Barlow
Greetings fellow Fedora friends! bodhi-2.11.0[0] has been deployed to production, and this release introduces a new state for updates where the request can be "batched". The purpose of this state is to give updates a place to sit once they've reached the stable requirements until the next weekly

ttorling uploaded Log-Any-1.701.tar.gz for perl-Log-Any

2017-10-05 Thread notifications
cb66cf36d0bd15fee8e397f3e9f916875cfff485d2177832be9a36fbdf88fda963c658f3317182acd5fcaa88fa14c46b8d5d05d7bd7572b35f81a6eba10dddf3 Log-Any-1.701.tar.gz

ttorling pushed to perl-Log-Any (f27). "Update to 1.701"

2017-10-05 Thread notifications
From 57c3f44333bd4e0eac9c28adeebf89f0d154aea2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Orling Date: Oct 05 2017 04:16:47 + Subject: Update to 1.701 --- diff --git a/perl-Log-Any.spec b/perl-Log-Any.spec index a1c8f66..c34c1eb 100644 --- a/perl-Log-Any.spec +++

ttorling pushed to perl-Log-Any (master). "Update to 1.701"

2017-10-05 Thread notifications
From 57c3f44333bd4e0eac9c28adeebf89f0d154aea2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Orling Date: Oct 05 2017 04:16:47 + Subject: Update to 1.701 --- diff --git a/perl-Log-Any.spec b/perl-Log-Any.spec index a1c8f66..c34c1eb 100644 --- a/perl-Log-Any.spec +++

[HEADS-UP] poppler soname bump

2017-10-05 Thread David Tardon
Hi, I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: boomaga calligra cups-filters evas-generic-loaders gambas3 gdal gdcm inkscape kf5-kfilemetadata libreoffice okular pdf2djvu poppler-sharp texlive texworks Note

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

2017-10-05 Thread Daniel Walsh
On 10/05/2017 01:55 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: Hi, Dan - On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 01:49:48PM -0400, Daniel Walsh wrote: [...] But really for something like this, it would be better to just run it --privileged. There is [no] security confinement present in what you are doing. Yup. I thought

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

2017-10-05 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi, Dan - On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 01:49:48PM -0400, Daniel Walsh wrote: > [...] > But really for something like this, it would be better to just run > it --privileged. There is [no] security confinement present in what > you are doing. Yup. I thought "atomic run --spc" would imply "docker run

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

2017-10-05 Thread Daniel Walsh
On 10/05/2017 01:47 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: Hi, Dan - Could you show the docker line that atomic run is executing? % atomic run --spc candidate-registry.fedoraproject.org/f26/systemtap /usr/share/systemtap/examples/io/iotop.stp docker run --cap-add SYS_MODULE -v

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

2017-10-05 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi, Dan - > Could you show the docker line that atomic run is executing? % atomic run --spc candidate-registry.fedoraproject.org/f26/systemtap /usr/share/systemtap/examples/io/iotop.stp docker run --cap-add SYS_MODULE -v /sys/kernel/debug:/sys/kernel/debug -v

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

2017-10-05 Thread Daniel Walsh
On 10/05/2017 01:38 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote: I don't see any avc when it fails while label:disable is set. I ran semodule -DB and retried. I now see dontaudit stuff but still no interesting denials. I'm not sure if you were talking to me or Frank with the atomic command line... I pulled the

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

2017-10-05 Thread Daniel Walsh
On 10/05/2017 01:18 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote: setenforce 0 works...security-opt label:disable does not. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Daniel Walsh > wrote: On 10/05/2017 01:00 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: wcohen forwarded:

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

2017-10-05 Thread Daniel Walsh
On 10/05/2017 01:11 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: Hi, Dan - [...] Rather then putting the system into permissive mode, you should run a privileged container "atomic run --spc " fails similarly on f26, despite its underlying "docker run --cap-add SYS_MODULE ..." parts. or at least disable

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

2017-10-05 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi, Dan - > [...] > Rather then putting the system into permissive mode, you should run > a privileged container "atomic run --spc " fails similarly on f26, despite its underlying "docker run --cap-add SYS_MODULE ..." parts. > or at least disable SELinux protections. > > docker run -ti

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

2017-10-05 Thread Daniel Walsh
On 10/05/2017 01:00 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: wcohen forwarded: [...] [root@dhcp23-91 ~]# atomic run --spc candidate-registry.fedoraproject.org/f26/systemtap docker run --cap-add SYS_MODULE -v

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

2017-10-05 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
wcohen forwarded: > [...] >> [root@dhcp23-91 ~]# atomic run --spc >> candidate-registry.fedoraproject.org/f26/systemtap >> >> docker run --cap-add SYS_MODULE -v /sys/kernel/debug:/sys/kernel/debug >> -v

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

2017-10-05 Thread William Cohen
On 10/05/2017 10:33 AM, Jeremy Eder wrote: > Forgot to add Will Cohen (discussed stap errors with him briefly).  Also my > replies won't make it to the dev list since I am not subscribed (just fyi I > guess). > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Jeremy Eder

Re: Odd message when escalating priveledge with sudo - F27 - LXQt - QTerminal ( Apologies if wrong list )

2017-10-05 Thread Dan Horák
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:58:35 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:36:33PM -, Zach Villers wrote: > > I just saw this and haven't had time to search Bugzilla yet; > > > > [jkrong@masada ~]$ sudo su > >

Re: Odd message when escalating priveledge with sudo - F27 - LXQt - QTerminal ( Apologies if wrong list )

2017-10-05 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:36:33PM -, Zach Villers wrote: > I just saw this and haven't had time to search Bugzilla yet; > > [jkrong@masada ~]$ sudo su > /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.bin: line 1 error due to: > Non-ASCII characters found >

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

2017-10-05 Thread Tomas Tomecek
Not sure if the question is for me -- I literally have no idea how to do that. Let me know how I can help, Tomas On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 09/18/2017 10:48 AM, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > > Hello, > > > > we managed to move tools container

[EPEL-devel] Re: Adding a new RPM to EPEL

2017-10-05 Thread James Hogarth
On 5 Oct 2017 3:57 am, "Digimer" wrote: Hi all, Pardon if this is the wrong place to ask, or if there is a FAQ for this (I checked https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL#How_can_I_contribute.3F). I've created a new RPM for the perl module Log::Journald, which makes writing