Dynamically-generated C stored in SVN is breaking our distribution because life is awful (was Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8)

On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 22:57 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 21:51 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:50:10PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > Well, true, but then just like every year, we'll wind up doing a lot of > > > > the spadework of fixing

Re: Removal of BuildRoot

Dne 19.2.2018 v 15:30 Randy Barlow napsal(a): > On 02/19/2018 06:19 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> The problem with Bodhi is that we don't use Bodhi for Rawhide where >> majority of work should be done. > There is an infrastructure hackathon in April where we hope to discuss a > way to enable Bodhi

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot

Dne 19.2.2018 v 17:16 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > El lun, 19-02-2018 a las 10:56 +0100, Vít Ondruch escribió: >> >> Dne 19.2.2018 v 00:52 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): >>> El vie, 16-02-2018 a las 12:56 +0100, Jan Kurik escribió: Proposed System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot

[Bug 1546963] New: perl-SVG-2.84 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546963 Bug ID: 1546963 Summary: perl-SVG-2.84 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-SVG Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1546962] New: perl-Mojolicious-7.67 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546962 Bug ID: 1546962 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-7.67 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mojolicious Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1546961] New: perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546961 Bug ID: 1546961 Summary: perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8

On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 21:51 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:50:10PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > Well, true, but then just like every year, we'll wind up doing a lot of > > > the spadework of fixing things to build with the new GCC. And probably > > > at first

Fedora Rawhide-20180219.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 24/129 (x86_64), 6/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 194012 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/194012 ID: 194013 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso

[389-devel] revised: Ticket 49296 - Fix race condition in connection code that allows anonymous limits to be applied after the initial bind occurs

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/e98427f971fd29c6d7ead1d975b71aef25c2b7b6e441c59cc3c04a82196dad73-0001-Ticket-49296-Fix-race-condition-in-connection-code-w.patch On 02/17/2018 06:45 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49296 > >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, 18 Feb 2018, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list > or anything else -- please let me know. > Fixed ascii, hardlink, netmask, pam_usb, and reptyr. -- Francisco Javier Tsao Santín http://gattaca.es 1024D/71CF4D62 42 F1 53

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Am Sonntag, den 18.02.2018, 18:09 +0100 schrieb Igor Gnatenko: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having > gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due > to random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors found by >

[Bug 1546886] CVE-2018-5123 bugzilla: CSRF in report.cgi allows to extract confidential information from a bug

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546886 Laura Pardo changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1546887 --- Comment

[Bug 1546887] CVE-2018-5123 bugzilla: CSRF in report.cgi allows to extract confidential information from a bug [epel-6]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546887 Laura Pardo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1546886

[Bug 1546887] CVE-2018-5123 bugzilla: CSRF in report.cgi allows to extract confidential information from a bug [epel-6]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546887 --- Comment #1 from Laura Pardo --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure

[Bug 1546887] New: CVE-2018-5123 bugzilla: CSRF in report.cgi allows to extract confidential information from a bug [epel-6]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546887 Bug ID: 1546887 Summary: CVE-2018-5123 bugzilla: CSRF in report.cgi allows to extract confidential information from a bug [epel-6] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el6

[Bug 1546886] New: CVE-2018-5123 bugzilla: CSRF in report.cgi allows to extract confidential information from a bug

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546886 Bug ID: 1546886 Summary: CVE-2018-5123 bugzilla: CSRF in report.cgi allows to extract confidential information from a bug Product: Security Response Component: vulnerability

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG (once every two weeks)

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity WG (once every two weeks) on 2018-02-20 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group. More information available at: [Modularity

[Bug 1525990] [RFE] please provide in EPEL

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525990 --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- perl(experimental) is in testing in EPEL7. A Buildroot Override would allow to build perl-mojolicious. If any help is needed, I'm available. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1542721] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542721 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon-1.00-14.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3b856ae7a7 -- You

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 14:14 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 05:35:12PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > I would like to have us look at not only the processes for how we build > > and ship the distribution. I have some ideas for how we can keep the > > important pieces of

[Bug 1542721] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542721 --- Comment #17 from Matthew Miller --- Thank you, Ralf! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot

> "DPB" == Daniel P Berrangé writes: DPB> I'm suggesting committing actual changes. Creating several 1000 DPB> pull requests is just as much a burden on maintainers as expecting DPB> them to edit several 1000 specs themselves. I welcome automatic changes to the

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 05:35:12PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > I would like to have us look at not only the processes for how we build > and ship the distribution. I have some ideas for how we can keep the > important pieces of how we build and ship things today, but give us the > flexibility

[Bug 1546584] perl-Importer-0.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546584 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Importer-0.025-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1438957] icons are missing on bugzilla's front page

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438957 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- bugzilla-5.0.4-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1542721] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542721 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 1438957] icons are missing on bugzilla's front page

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438957 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1546584] perl-Importer-0.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546584 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1078 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 841 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 423

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 951 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 841 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 812

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having > gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due > to random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors found by > analyzing

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Il 18/02/2018 18:09, Igor Gnatenko ha scritto: If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list or anything else -- please let me know. I've fixed libpasastro, rawtherapee and wcstools. ___ devel mailing list --

[Bug 1546268] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546268 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1543181

[Bug 1546269] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546269 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1543181

[Bug 1543181] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543181 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1546269,

[Bug 1542721] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542721 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|

Re: Removal of BuildRoot

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:06:17AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: >> failed tests do not show up >> on the main page (probably was not considered because of how poorly >> the test information fetching goes). > > I guess

Re: BSD 2-Clause license

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:22:56AM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote: > Hi, > > > Would it be possible to add: > > BSD 2-clause > > to our table of valid licenses? Which table are you referring to ? The main list of licenses in the following page already includes it

[Bug 1546269] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546269 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED

Re: Removal of BuildRoot

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:06:17AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > failed tests do not show up > on the main page (probably was not considered because of how poorly > the test information fetching goes). I guess you're referring to the: `Tests Passed` under the `Test Gating Status` on the right hand

[Bug 1546269] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546269 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

BSD 2-Clause license

Hi, Would it be possible to add: BSD 2-clause to our table of valid licenses? It is already in https://spdx.org/licenses/ BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License |BSD-2-Clause| and is OSI-approved. For reference:

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot

El lun, 19-02-2018 a las 10:56 +0100, Vít Ondruch escribió: > > > Dne 19.2.2018 v 00:52 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > > El vie, 16-02-2018 a las 12:56 +0100, Jan Kurik escribió: > > > Proposed System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot > > >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc > and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due

libgnome-games-support soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I've updated libgnome-games-support in rawhide to 1.3.90 , which comes with a soname bump. Should be API compatible. -Yanko ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Removal of BuildRoot

On 02/17/2018 02:30 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Rpmlint can be configured using the --rpmlintconf/-r option or by setting a > .rpmlint file in the working directory There's an open RFE to get taskotron to use such a file, though it hasn't yet been suggested that it use the same path as

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc > and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to > random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some

Re: to batch or not to batch?

On 02/19/2018 03:40 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > On 02/19/2018 06:34 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> But anyway, why don't we >> have "updates-testing", "updates-batched" and "updates" repositories? >> "updates-batched" could be enabled by default while "updates" could be >> enabled manually if one wishes.

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

> On 18/02/18 18:09, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> Some packages might be missed due to short koji outage, >> broken dependencies and so on, but majority of real failures >> is below. >> >> If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing >> packages in list or anything else -- please

f2c new version

While going through packages to add the BR for gcc/gcc-c++ I noticed that the f2c package needed some attention. I've cleaned up the spec file immensely and updated to the latest version. Checking with abi-compliance-checker shows the ABI hasn't changed so I plan to do the new build now. Thanks,

Re: to batch or not to batch?

On 02/19/2018 06:34 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > But anyway, why don't we > have "updates-testing", "updates-batched" and "updates" repositories? > "updates-batched" could be enabled by default while "updates" could be > enabled manually if one wishes. When we talked about this in the past I believe

Re: Removal of BuildRoot

On 02/19/2018 06:19 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > The problem with Bodhi is that we don't use Bodhi for Rawhide where > majority of work should be done. There is an infrastructure hackathon in April where we hope to discuss a way to enable Bodhi for Rawhide so it can gate updates based on automated

Re: Removal of BuildRoot

On 02/15/2018 10:17 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: I feel PRs are better for this sort of stuff. Mainly because people are informed why exactly this change is made, they can read the guidelines and then merge the change when they are sure they understand it. It helps spreading knowledge and keeping

Re: Removal of BuildRoot

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 6:19 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 17.2.2018 v 14:01 Neal Gompa napsal(a): >> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III >> wrote: "NG" == Neal Gompa writes: >>> NG> As upstream for

Re: Orphaned Packages looking for a new point of contact

On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 16:40 -0500, David Cantrell wrote: > On 02/16/2018 11:32 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > There's some packages that have been orphaned by FESCo and are > > seeking a > > new point of contact to stay in the collection. > > > > If you are interested in becoming

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

>> On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild >> > without having gcc and gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora >> > packages, many of which failed due to random reasons and >> > I grepped all logs for some common errors found

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 18/02/18 18:09, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Some packages might be missed due to short koji outage, broken dependencies and so on, but majority of real failures is below. If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list or anything else -- please let me know. I fixed

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

Hello guys, and sorry for the delay - I've got caught in my other responsibilites. I have created the Wiki page for this change, as requested: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GhostscriptPackageUpdate28 To comply with the guidelines there, I had to categorize this as a "system-wide change"

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:39 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Dne 18.2.2018 v 18:09 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > List of packages and respective maintainers: > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > msuchy PyPAM imvirt obs-signd perl-Filesys-Df perl-Math-FFT rhnsd rhnsd - sent PR to upstream everything else fixed in rawhide.

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot

On 02/16/2018 06:33 PM, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: ??? Other compilers such as golang can generate ELF binaries too. The world has moved on. Most of these languages will still call gcc for the final link (as they should). Calling ld directly makes very little sense and makes future

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot

Jan Kurik wrote: > Since beginning of Fedora, gcc (and gcc-c++) are installed in every > buildroot. Times have changed and nowadays many of packages are not > written in C/C++, they are written in Python, Ruby, Node.js, Go, Rust, > OCaml, Perl and so on so they don't need to have C/C++ compiler. >

[Bug 1546269] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546269 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment

Re: Intent to retire: zerofree

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:57:03AM +0100, Robert Scheck wrote: > Hello Richard, > > On Sun, 18 Feb 2018, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > If you wish to take it over, I can orphan it instead. > > I'm happy to take zerofree. I *think* I've pressed the right buttons to give you the project ...

Re: Removal of sln

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:37:09AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 02/16/2018 10:53 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >There are some %post scripts which still use this, notably > >ca-certificates, so that's now broken. > > What do you propose instead? Revert the removal, exposing SELinux > and

Re: to batch or not to batch?

I am using Rawhide, so I personally don't care. But anyway, why don't we have "updates-testing", "updates-batched" and "updates" repositories? "updates-batched" could be enabled by default while "updates" could be enabled manually if one wishes. Vít Dne 17.2.2018 v 23:15 Zbigniew

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hi, I fixed: bibutils eb emacspeak hugs98 scim-hangul wmctrl Jens ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Removal of BuildRoot

Dne 17.2.2018 v 14:01 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III > wrote: >>> "NG" == Neal Gompa writes: >> NG> As upstream for rpmlint, I do not believe anyone cares at all about >> NG> rpmlint in Fedora. >> >> We

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-19 9:30 GMT+01:00 Igor Gnatenko : >> amsynth has been fixed in all supported branches. > > It should have both gcc and gcc-c++. Done, BR for both. Ciao Guido Aulisi fas account: tartina ___ devel mailing list

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 11:47 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/19/2018 11:27 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:02 +, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > On 19/02/18 08:30,

Python 3.7.0b1 in testing

Please test and add karma: * F27: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ac25c1d872 * F26: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c743211a24 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ python-devel mailing list

[Bug 1546584] perl-Importer-0.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546584 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Importer-0.025-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7787adcfb9 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1546584] perl-Importer-0.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546584 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Importer-0.025-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7e3105358b -- You are receiving this mail

Re: Intent to retire: zerofree

Hello Richard, On Sun, 18 Feb 2018, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > If you wish to take it over, I can orphan it instead. I'm happy to take zerofree. Regards, Robert pgpCajlfkSZiz.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list --

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 02/19/2018 11:27 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:02 +, Tom Hughes wrote: On 19/02/18 08:30, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:12 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: amsynth has been fixed in all supported branches.

[Bug 1546584] perl-Importer-0.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546584 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

Re: Removal of sln

On 16 Feb 2018, at 11:53 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I also don't think rather fundamental, useful and old tools like this > should be removed without discussion. +1. While the foundations for your house might be old, taking a sledgehammer to those foundations without

Re: Removal of sln

On 02/16/2018 10:53 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: There are some %post scripts which still use this, notably ca-certificates, so that's now broken. What do you propose instead? Revert the removal, exposing SELinux and other issues because some tools do not deal properly with hardlinks? Or

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 11:15 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: > 2018-02-19 9:30 GMT+01:00 Igor Gnatenko : > > On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:12 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > Hi Igor > > > > > > > 2018-02-18 18:09 GMT+01:00

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:02 +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 19/02/18 08:30, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:12 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > > > amsynth has been fixed in all supported branches. > > > > It should have both

[Bug 1546405] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546405 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-19 9:30 GMT+01:00 Igor Gnatenko : > On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:12 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: >> Hi Igor >> >> > 2018-02-18 18:09 GMT+01:00 Igor Gnatenko >> > : >> > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 07:13:19PM +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote: > On 2018-02-16, 17:38 GMT, Daniel P Berrangé wrote: > > Yes, but that's likely a small % of overall and it is harmless > > if we addd BR: gcc to a few packages which don't need it > > - they'll be no worse off than they are today, and

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot

Dne 19.2.2018 v 00:52 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > El vie, 16-02-2018 a las 12:56 +0100, Jan Kurik escribió: >> Proposed System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_GCC_from_BuildRoot >> >> >> Owner(s): >> * Igor Gnatenko >> >> >> Removing gcc

[Bug 1546590] perltidy-20180219 is available

Fixed In Version||perltidy-20180219-1.fc28 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-02-19 04:53:14 --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth <p...@city-fan.org> --- Build done: https://koji.fedoraproj

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot

Dne 16.2.2018 v 17:03 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > Dne 16.2.2018 v 16:54 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): >> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 04:22:58PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide --source >>> --whatrequires 'libc.so.6*' | sort -u | sed -r

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

psabatatinyfugue wmname xssstate All three fixed in Rawhide. Also added other missing build deps when I was at it :) Also tinyfugue could do with some more love. I wonder if anybody is using it in Fedora, though. P signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Intent to retire: zerofree

Rich, Thanks for packaging zerofree. It's been great to be able to install my own software without having to build it. Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >zerofree is a package that can take an ext2 (only?) filesystem, work >out what parts of the filesystem are not used, and either zero them or

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:02:34AM +, Tom Hughes wrote: > and gcc-c++ has to require gcc anyway. It does. Jakub ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 19/02/18 08:30, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:12 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: amsynth has been fixed in all supported branches. It should have both gcc and gcc-c++. I don't think you ever need both - the guidelines say "gcc, gcc-c++ or clang" and gcc-c++ has to require

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 1479864] Upgrade perl-Net-SSH-Perl to 2.12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479864 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1546648

Re: Pagure - Can't remove yourself from a project if not an admin?

On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 07:26:37AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: >I spent about 10 minutes trying to figure out how to remove myself from a >project (for which I'm not an admin) and I have come to the conclusion >that I'm not able to do so. >Is this a known issue? Yes there are more

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:12 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: > Hi Igor > > > 2018-02-18 18:09 GMT+01:00 Igor Gnatenko > > : > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc > > and > >

Re: Removal of BuildRoot

On 02/16/2018 02:36 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: On 16 February 2018 at 11:21, Panu Matilainen > wrote: [..] Not everybody runs rpmlint for everything they produce, on the contrary I suspect it's fairly small percentage of packagers out

[Bug 1544345] perl-YAML-Tiny-1.70-4.fc28 FTBFS: t/10_read.t: Failed test ' Got expected error' with Encode 2.95

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544345 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1544345] perl-YAML-Tiny-1.70-4.fc28 FTBFS: t/10_read.t: Failed test ' Got expected error' with Encode 2.95

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544345 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hi Igor > 2018-02-18 18:09 GMT+01:00 Igor Gnatenko : > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to > random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some