Hi,
(This message is cross-posted to the Fedora devel and R SIG Fedora
mailing lists.)
Currently, R-core installs macros.R which defines one macro:
%_R_make_search_index /usr/lib/rpm/R-make-search-index.sh
This script does nothing, and there is no mention of this macro in our
guidelines. The
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 05:48:15 UTC
From 0827676d5047bd09706ce90d621748b3a0f61185 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 05:48:10 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 05:20:39 UTC
From 4dd756a3c048daf9d30e187c74e9538860581f07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 05:20:34 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 05:20:48 UTC
From 451c3891a7b95aa7175ced11b5eac68d8fa48854 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 05:20:44 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 05:20:30 UTC
From 7e92885677b57b9088946c19e1b6e39012f1e2bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 05:20:25 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 04:41:27 UTC
From 844e9e8924f612d6acbe222746238fae3bdd442b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 04:41:22 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 04:38:22 UTC
From 6c0ee5d389c3605689dca9343fd25fcccb56eaa7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 04:38:17 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 04:28:36 UTC
From 8bb25e507b5d6f3a9c6f200ca1bb79898931d887 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 04:28:31 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 04:27:18 UTC
From 4d5414ec291dbacf1b2f5be715f9f53209813877 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 04:27:13 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 04:26:02 UTC
From 9edde4c67a7885ce9f41c9878af94a88c19f4876 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 04:25:56 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 04:14:43 UTC
From cb7468b7b90fccecb454571d154f258271813a0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 04:14:37 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 03:47:39 UTC
From 592b7121deb7ca4bdb42b4cf9427c75128cd4968 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 03:47:34 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 03:37:40 UTC
From f9188b8c5bbd9194e355199626e2d9d96b724902 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 03:37:35 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 03:38:43 UTC
From e090f5be09b270579f8439e4853b3d87e309cfe7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 03:38:37 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 02:42:23 UTC
From 47771aa8c0c75f1e6d7ddcfac31718cf02b1323a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 02:42:18 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/07/26/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.6-20190725git4295210.fc30.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
36 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-12f1eb1b1f
tomcat-7.0.94-1.el6
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing
holland-1.1.18-1.el6
lua-dbi-0.7.2-1.el6
Details
Please remove me from your mailing list.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 02:12:55 UTC
From 8d5a8e7d6437123762cd7b61909e7d5ecc76b60e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 02:12:50 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
345 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
121 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d2c1368294
cinnamon-3.6.7-5.el7
87
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 01:43:25 UTC
From 8fbe9ab0cef27fac0cfaceba85daa572ed5b3987 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 01:43:20 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 01:40:12 UTC
From 39029ecacdf1282e67fc402c5e193b154022e94f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 01:40:07 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 01:29:24 UTC
From 0f23f34171aab685bbe94b9e35a63b7cd9b69840 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 01:29:19 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2019-07-26 01:26:57 UTC
From 99b3f724118f55334f9a08bac2dd18de33b1cd4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 26 2019 01:26:51 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1730549
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
> "RF" == Richard Fearn writes:
RF> According to
RF>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_architecture_build_failures:
>> If a Fedora package does not successfully compile, build or work on
>> an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the
>> spec
Hi,
> By following the process, all of your packages will get orphaned.
> If that is your desire, shall we do it directly?
That part, please don't :)
The reason why I'm encouraging people to become co-maintainers is
because I won't be unavailable forever, but longer than the orphan
grace
hmmm. from the root.log
DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Error:
DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Problem: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides kernel >= 4.18.0
needed by firewalld-0.6.4-1.fc31.noarch
how to deal with this? Wait for a new firewalld
On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 11:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 10:28 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 09:51:31AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 15:48 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at
On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 10:28 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 09:51:31AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 15:48 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 01:32:29PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > > In general
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 1:11 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 7/25/19 3:48 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > Yet Another Ceph Build Stuck in Pending Testing
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-623fb9419e
> >
> > Would someone please give it a kick.
>
> Done.
>
Thanks
>
> And
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "JO" == Joe Orton writes:
>
> JO> In the historic CVS-based build system which predated what we now
> JO> use, we could do GPG key verification at the time of downloading and
> JO> importing a new tarball.
>
> You're right; tmz dug up a copy of the old
On 7/25/19 3:48 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> Yet Another Ceph Build Stuck in Pending Testing
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-623fb9419e
>
> Would someone please give it a kick.
Done.
And sorry again this continues to happen. ;(
kevin
signature.asc
Description:
As a maintainer of python-certifi, I wish to get rid of python2-certifi.
It has some dependencies:
$ repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires python2-certifi
python2-dulwich-0:0.19.11-2.fc31.x86_64
$ repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires python2-dulwich
> "JO" == Joe Orton writes:
JO> In the historic CVS-based build system which predated what we now
JO> use, we could do GPG key verification at the time of downloading and
JO> importing a new tarball.
You're right; tmz dug up a copy of the old Makefile.common file:
On 7/25/19 3:04 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
> It started to get stuck again. Right now I'm experiencing this issue
> with RabbitMQ for F-30 and F-31:
>
> * https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36457376
> * https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36457345
So,
Good Morning Everyone,
I just wanted to let everyone know that this is now live.
You can see all the updates going through (or not) to rawhide in:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/releases/F31
Many many thanks to all the people involved, I'm afraid I'll miss some but I'll
take the risk, so here
Good Morning Everyone,
I just wanted to let everyone know that this is now live.
You can see all the updates going through (or not) to rawhide in:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/releases/F31
Many many thanks to all the people involved, I'm afraid I'll miss some but I'll
take the risk, so here
Hi,
Due to a dependency on Eclipse, findbugs-contrib can no longer be
built on non-64-bit architectures. According to
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_architecture_build_failures:
> If a Fedora package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
> architecture,
On 25. 07. 19 14:51, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Yes your assumption is correct. Koji uses src.rpm names to determine what it
pulls into a buildroot. That means that the python34 items need to have
non-conflicting names with the python3 ones shipped by upstream.. or we will
just start building
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019, 3:48 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hey,
>
> when RHEL 7.7 will be released, the following new components/packages will
> be
> provided (assuming from 7.7 beta):
>
> python3 - the Python 3.6 package
>
>
> This new RHEL7 component builds several
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 45 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 12/147 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 08:46, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 08:21, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>> On 17. 07. 19 0:00, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> > ...we need 1 or 2 new components for python34-pip and python2-pip -
>> either
>> > we have each in a separate component or we
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 08:21, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 17. 07. 19 0:00, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > ...we need 1 or 2 new components for python34-pip and python2-pip -
> either
> > we have each in a separate component or we create a new component that
> > builds both (called python-pip-epel maybe?).
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190724.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190725.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:9
Upgraded packages: 72
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 592.48 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On 2019-07-25, Björn Persson wrote:
> Verifying the signature as part of the build ensures that packagers
> don't forget to verify it.
>
Then it's a job for "fedpkg new-sources" or spectool, not for rpmbuild.
>> (4) Verification of modified archives conflicts with a legal requirement
>> that
Le 2019-07-25 12:17, Björn Persson a écrit :
Hit,
An RPM spec is not a place for golfing. Readable code takes priority
over saving keystrokes.
Then it should be implemented cleanly in a declarative syntax,
with %{gpg_signatureX} and %{gpg_keyringX} variables matching
%{sourceX}, and a
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 3:17 AM wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 14:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 14:24 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > BTW, as a general note, it seems there's a trend building up where
> > quite significant changes to anaconda's design are being
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 3:50 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 09:48:01AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F31Boost170
> > > == Summary ==
> > > This change brings Boost 1.70 to Fedora. This will mean Fedora ships
> > > with a recent
On 17. 07. 19 0:00, Miro Hrončok wrote:
...we need 1 or 2 new components for python34-pip and python2-pip - either
we have each in a separate component or we create a new component that
builds both (called python-pip-epel maybe?).
What is the advice here? If I want it to be just one package,
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> I'm more worried about it relying on GPG at the moment considering the state
> of
> the SKS network [1].
> What are the changes that we end up breaking a build if we suddenly get a
> poisoned key? Are we going to break just a build or could this have more
> annoying
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:46:11PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
> > We'd put the set of trusted GPG keys in the repository alongside the
> > spec file, using some standard filename, and the build system would try
> > check the .asc against the keys when downloading (or
Yet Another Ceph Build Stuck in Pending Testing
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-623fb9419e
Would someone please give it a kick.
Thanks
--
Kaleb
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:15:26PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > we've got new section in Packaging Guidelines about verifying upstream
> > sources[0] with GPG. Please use it whenever possible :)
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > [0]
> >
Hello, Remi Collet.
Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:16:54 +0200 you wrote:
> Additional question, what will happen when the key will expire ?
Expired keys cannot be used for signing or encrypting. But they still
can be used for decrypting and verifying signatures.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 06:46:24AM -, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2019-07-24, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > we've got new section in Packaging Guidelines about verifying upstream
> > sources[0] with GPG. Please use it whenever possible :)
> [...]
> > [0]
> >
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 25. 07. 19 v 8:46 Petr Pisar napsal(a):
> > (1) I don't agree this feature is helpful. If we don't trust ./sources
> > file content in dist-git, we cannot trust keyring stored in the the same
> > dist-git repository. In other words it only brings another code into
> > spec
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 09:51:31AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 15:48 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 01:32:29PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > In general there's usecases where a low resource desktop is useful,
> > > > such on devices
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:29:56AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 23. 07. 19 22:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > TL;DR: On July 24th we will turn on the first phase of Rawhide package
> > gating,
> > for single build updates.
>
> Where at
Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2019-07-24, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > we've got new section in Packaging Guidelines about verifying upstream
> > sources[0] with GPG. Please use it whenever possible :)
> [...]
> > [0]
> >
BTW, there is this proposal:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/463
Vít
Dne 25. 07. 19 v 11:17 Joe Orton napsal(a):
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:15:26PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> we've got new section in Packaging Guidelines about verifying upstream
>>
On 25. 07. 19 12:00, Artur Iwicki wrote:
My packages built fine on i686, but I've had a different cpio-related error on
s390x:
DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: error: unpacking of archive failed on file
[...]: cpio: read failed - Inappropriate ioctl for device
Is this just some random
Hello All!
It started to get stuck again. Right now I'm experiencing this issue
with RabbitMQ for F-30 and F-31:
* https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36457376
* https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36457345
чт, 11 июл. 2019 г. в 19:14, Kevin Fenzi :
>
> On
My packages built fine on i686, but I've had a different cpio-related error on
s390x:
>DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: error: unpacking of archive failed on file
>[...]: cpio: read failed - Inappropriate ioctl for device
Is this just some random one-off thing, or did anyone else get the same
Is it really a good idea to launch the mass rebuild now,
when cpio is broken on i386 ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1729382
And
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36501622
Probably going to have lot of FTBFS
Remi
On 23. 07. 19 22:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Good Morning Everyone,
TL;DR: On July 24th we will turn on the first phase of Rawhide package gating,
for single build updates.
Where at https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/ do I find the rawhide updates?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:15:26PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we've got new section in Packaging Guidelines about verifying upstream
> sources[0] with GPG. Please use it whenever possible :)
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> [0]
>
Additional question, what will happen when the key will expire ?
Ok, probably not going to happen in Fedora, but may happen in some other
distributions, supported for more years
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Le 24/07/2019 à 23:15, Igor Gnatenko a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> we've got new section in Packaging Guidelines about verifying upstream
> sources[0] with GPG. Please use it whenever possible :)
Looking at the Guidelines...
Implementing it for PHP...
I agree with Petr and Wit, I don't see any real
> On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 15:48 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 01:32:29PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > In general there's usecases where a low resource desktop is useful,
> > > such on devices with only 1Gb of RAM where Workstation doesn't provide
> > > a good
On 2019-07-25, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2019-07-23, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Per the Fedora 31 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for Fedora
>> 31 tomorrow. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 31 for all the changes
>> listed in
>>
>>
On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 15:29 +0200, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> Kamil Paral píše v St 24. 07. 2019 v 13:37 +0200:
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:44 PM Ben Cotton
> > wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Anaconda_Reclaim_Disk_Space
> > >
> > > The Manual Partitioning screen supports all
Dne 25. 07. 19 v 8:46 Petr Pisar napsal(a):
> On 2019-07-24, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> we've got new section in Packaging Guidelines about verifying upstream
>> sources[0] with GPG. Please use it whenever possible :)
> [...]
>> [0]
>>
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 01:38:23AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 24. 07. 19 17:30, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > Pierre-Yves Chibon writes:
> >
> > > When you run `fedpkg build` on Rawhide, your package will be built in
> > > a new koji tag (which will be the default target for Rawhide). The
> > >
On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 14:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 14:24 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 15:29 +0200, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> > > Kamil Paral píše v St 24. 07. 2019 v 13:37 +0200:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:44 PM Ben Cotton
> > > >
On 2019-07-23, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> --===2842249291292134861==
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="614583058e5d7a59"
>
> --614583058e5d7a59
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora 31 schedule[1] we will be
On 2019-07-24, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> we've got new section in Packaging Guidelines about verifying upstream
> sources[0] with GPG. Please use it whenever possible :)
[...]
> [0]
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_source_file_verification
May I know a FPC ticket where
77 matches
Mail list logo
