https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/51193
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/51175
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 06/25/2020 08:01 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wine has soft-dependencies on two additional pieces of software to provide a
> "full" experience.
>
> * wine-gecko - Gecko web browser engine for Wine
> * wine-mono - .NET for Wine
>
> I package both for Wine. They're typically
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/06/26/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.3-20200625git98a8287.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Michael Cronenworth writes:
> The bi-weekly Wine update last week brought with it a minor version
> (5.0.0->5.1.0)
> wine-mono update. The update itself is not minor. The tarball is now bundling
> a
> Clang LLVM-based MinGW toolchain in binary form that is also required to
> compile the
>
Hi,
Wine has soft-dependencies on two additional pieces of software to provide a "full"
experience.
* wine-gecko - Gecko web browser engine for Wine
* wine-mono - .NET for Wine
I package both for Wine. They're typically updated at most a couple times per year.
Usually the updates bring with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841308
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 22:30 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
> Well, I strongy disagree whit this move.
> In fact on of the things that I hate of Debian/Ubuntu is the choice of nano
> and the poor version that they offer by default of vi.
> More friendly for end-users? Really?
> Please thinking so,
On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 08:44 +0800, Qiyu Yan wrote:
> What about to provide a prompt to the user telling them the difference
> between editors?
> For example, when a new user to fedora first invokes git commit
> without $EDITOR set, a program named fedora-default-editor comes up
> and asks: Which
On 6/25/20 4:48 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 1:40 AM Peter Hutterer wrote:
disclaimer: I'm using zsh, not bash but it has the same issue. But IMO you
can't really blame it - how is the completion to know that you want to
install an RPM in the current directory? The
El jue., 25 jun. 2020 a las 21:45, Qiyu Yan ()
escribió:
> What about to provide a prompt to the user telling them the difference
> between editors?
> For example, when a new user to fedora first invokes git commit
> without $EDITOR set, a program named fedora-default-editor comes up
> and asks:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850928
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-4b43fef7c5 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850935
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-f5ed64fc47 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
Jerry James writes:
> My experience is that the build dependencies in the opam files are of
> high quality, but that test and documentation dependencies are often
> omitted. We could add those manually, so that may not be a big deal.
If you add them manually, maybe upstream would accept a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850767
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850928
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850935
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a32cbcaa37
tcpreplay-4.3.3-1.el8
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-232e4f7411
python-django-2.2.13-1.el8
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846729
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-2.28-1.fc33 |perl-CPAN-2.28-1.fc33
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846509
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Devel-Gladiator-0.08-1 |perl-Devel-Gladiator-0.08-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818509
Bug 1818509 depends on bug 1803711, which changed state.
Bug 1803711 Summary: perl-Tk-804.034-9.fc33 FTBFS: t/entry.t test fails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803711
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849996
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803711
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818509
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
What about to provide a prompt to the user telling them the difference
between editors?
For example, when a new user to fedora first invokes git commit
without $EDITOR set, a program named fedora-default-editor comes up
and asks: Which editor do you like?
User can do his or hers choice and the
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 08:50:23PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> This is another step trying to make Fedora end-user friendly while the
> only effect is making it hostile to developers. As Fedora will never be
> used by end-users as it conflicts with Fedora's foundation Freedom. With
> each such
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 1:40 AM Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> disclaimer: I'm using zsh, not bash but it has the same issue. But IMO you
> can't really blame it - how is the completion to know that you want to
> install an RPM in the current directory? The correct way would be
> dnf install
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:38:13PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 21:21:37 +0200, Chris Adams wrote:
> > I'm not sure why you think end-users can't use a free OS.
>
> First steps of end-users is to install Chrome, Spotify and VirtualBox.
> So there is left no advantage of a
On 6/25/20 4:11 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:38 PM Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 21:21:37 +0200, Chris Adams wrote:
Unless you are doing kernel development, why do you care what the kernel
messages say? On my systems, they go by too fast to read anyway.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:38 PM Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 21:21:37 +0200, Chris Adams wrote:
> > I'm not sure why you think end-users can't use a free OS.
>
> First steps of end-users is to install Chrome, Spotify and VirtualBox.
> So there is left no advantage of a Free OS.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851257
Bug ID: 1851257
Summary: perl-File-Map-0.67 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-File-Map
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 4:16 AM Dan Čermák
wrote:
> %generate_buildrequires could be used to parse the opam file from the
> tarball and extract the dependent opam packages from the depends:
> array. E.g. the following:
I've been thinking along those lines as well. More automation would be
> suve copydeps dnstwist python-ssdeep
Fixed in rawhide (just dist-git, didn't run the builds). Should there be a new
release for any of these, I'll fix it for F32/31, too.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 6:04 PM Joe Doss wrote:
>
>
>
> On June 25, 2020 4:50:12 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 6:33 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>>>
>>>
From what I understood of the thread it's purely removing the akmod
and the new kernels have the module so how does
On June 25, 2020 4:50:12 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 6:33 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
From what I understood of the thread it's purely removing the akmod
and the new kernels have the module so how does it break their VPNs?
If you remove akmod-wireguard it will also remove
Yesterday I fixed a FTBFS, but it's still showing in my dashboard. I
suppose that it takes some time to update, but how long should I
expect it to show there until I should suspect that there's some bug?
Iñaki
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 11:20, Josef Skladanka wrote:
>
> Iñaki,
>
> looking at your
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:49 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> ...snip...
>
> That would be a rather serious flaw in the wireguard tools package to
> have a dep on akmod-wireguard when it has been upstream and included
> in the Fedora kernel-modules package for a few months at this point.
>
>
The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851246
Bug ID: 1851246
Summary: perl-constant-tiny: FTBFS with Perl 5.32
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-constan
t-tiny
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 21:58:28 +0200, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> try 'ls $HOME/' without the direxpand
> option set, and tell me what on earth that is for.
It works as expected, what is the problem? Using ctrl-e instead of direxpand
but keeping there $HOME/ may be what one wants.
> the only thing I
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 6:33 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> > From what I understood of the thread it's purely removing the akmod
> > and the new kernels have the module so how does it break their VPNs?
>
> If you remove akmod-wireguard it will also remove the wireguard package which
> will cause the
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:58 PM Kamil Dudka wrote:
> ...snip...
>
> Gentoo Linux uses the /etc/env.d tree to globally set environment
> variables:
>
> https://devmanual.gentoo.org/tasks-reference/environment/index.html
>
> It worked there long time before systemd was invented. But clearing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851243
--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
The failed build in rawhide
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46160192
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851243
Bug ID: 1851243
Summary: perl-Test-Fake-HTTPD: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Test-Fa
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 21:21:37 +0200, Chris Adams wrote:
> I'm not sure why you think end-users can't use a free OS.
First steps of end-users is to install Chrome, Spotify and VirtualBox.
So there is left no advantage of a Free OS.
> I've run with SELinux enabled for years, rarely if ever causes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851240
Bug ID: 1851240
Summary: perl-App-a2p-1.013 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-App-a2p
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Just forwarding this question to more appropriate list.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: %forgemeta support for `git` tasks in checked-out code?
Date: Thursday, June 25, 2020, 6:42:42 PM CEST
From: PGNet Dev
To: copr-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org
I'm building a package using
On Thursday, June 25, 2020 10:27:06 PM CEST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:40 pm, Ian McInerney
> wrote:
>
> > Are you sure this will work? I just ran a test, and putting a new
> > config file inside /usr/lib/environment.d only works for Gnome, and
> > doesn't work for
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, at 4:03 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:41 PM Ian McInerney
> wrote:
> >>
> >> ...snip...
> >> == Scope ==
> >> * Proposal owners:
> >> ** Modify comps to include nano Fedora wide.
> >> ** Create a new subpackage of nano, called
> >> nano-editor.
> >> **
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 08:18:27PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 06:10:23PM -, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> > Isn't this how bodhi always worked? One week (two weeks for EPEL) and
> > if doesn't get negative karma, it gets pushed - no matter if it's an
> > enhancement, or a
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:40 pm, Ian McInerney
wrote:
Are you sure this will work? I just ran a test, and putting a new
config file inside /usr/lib/environment.d only works for Gnome, and
doesn't work for Mate, Cinnamon or SSH (tested by opening a terminal
in the respective session and
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:26 AM Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
> python-zodbpicklejjames
> sympycbm jjames jussilehtola orion
I fixed these two in Rawhide, and also fixed a python 3.9 bug in sympy
and an endianness bug in python-gmpy2 en passant.
--
Jerry James
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:04 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:41 PM Ian McInerney
> wrote:
> >>
> >> ...snip...
> >> == Scope ==
> >> * Proposal owners:
> >> ** Modify comps to include nano Fedora wide.
> >> ** Create a new subpackage of nano, called
> >> nano-editor.
> >> **
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:41 PM Ian McInerney wrote:
>>
>> ...snip...
>> == Scope ==
>> * Proposal owners:
>> ** Modify comps to include nano Fedora wide.
>> ** Create a new subpackage of nano, called
>> nano-editor.
>> ** nano-editor to include
>> /usr/lib/environment.d/10-nano.conf, which sets
On 25/06/20 13:34 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:50 PM Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:18:59 +0200, Ben Cotton wrote:
> In contrast, Nano offers the kind of graphical text editing experience
> that people are used to,
This is another step trying to make
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:58 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:48 PM Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 2:45 pm, Michael Catanzaro
> > wrote:
> > > Yes. I already fixed the wiki page to clarify that we don't need to
> > > install nano, but I forgot to
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:48 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 2:45 pm, Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> > Yes. I already fixed the wiki page to clarify that we don't need to
> > install nano, but I forgot to clarify that we will install
> > nano-editor by default.
>
> BTW
On 25/06/20 20:50 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:18:59 +0200, Ben Cotton wrote:
In contrast, Nano offers the kind of graphical text editing experience
that people are used to,
This is another step trying to make Fedora end-user friendly while the only
effect is making it
On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 14:47 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 2:45 pm, Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> > Yes. I already fixed the wiki page to clarify that we don't need to
> > install nano, but I forgot to clarify that we will install
> > nano-editor by default.
>
> BTW
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 2:45 pm, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
Yes. I already fixed the wiki page to clarify that we don't need to
install nano, but I forgot to clarify that we will install
nano-editor by default.
BTW maybe nano-editor is not the best name for the subpackage,
considering it will
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:40 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote:
"nano" is already included by default. Did you mean this to say
you'll
include the new "nano-editor" package by default?
Yes. I already fixed the wiki page to clarify that we don't need to
install nano, but I forgot to clarify that we
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:21 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> My only regret is that I have but one +1 to give to this proposal!
Wait, wait, wait. Aren't you Canadian?
I don't really care much one way or the other about the proposal.
I've learned enough vi to get by. I'll give nano a try and
>
> ...snip...
> == Scope ==
> * Proposal owners:
> ** Modify comps to include nano Fedora wide.
> ** Create a new subpackage of nano, called
> nano-editor.
> ** nano-editor to include
> /usr/lib/environment.d/10-nano.conf, which sets
> $EDITOR to nano.
>
> With this approach, if nano is
On 6/25/20 10:18 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
** Modify comps to include nano Fedora wide.
"nano" is already included by default. Did you mean this to say you'll
include the new "nano-editor" package by default?
** Create a new subpackage of nano, called
nano-editor.
** nano-editor to include
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 01:34:33PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:50 PM Jan Kratochvil
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:18:59 +0200, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > In contrast, Nano offers the kind of graphical text editing experience
> > > that people are used to,
> >
>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:50 PM Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:18:59 +0200, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > In contrast, Nano offers the kind of graphical text editing experience
> > that people are used to,
>
> This is another step trying to make Fedora end-user friendly while the only
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:50 PM Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:18:59 +0200, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > In contrast, Nano offers the kind of graphical text editing experience
> > that people are used to,
>
> This is another step trying to make Fedora end-user friendly while the only
>
Once upon a time, Jan Kratochvil said:
> This is another step trying to make Fedora end-user friendly while the only
> effect is making it hostile to developers.
I've been setting $EDITOR and $VISUAL for ages (since long before Fedora
existed, probably since before Red Hat existed).
> As Fedora
On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 13:18 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UseNanoByDefault
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Let's make Fedora more approachable, by having a default editor that
> doesn't require specialist knowledge to use.
My only regret is that I have but one +1 to
Hello,
On Thursday, June 25, 2020 12:50:23 PM MDT Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:18:59 +0200, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> > In contrast, Nano offers the kind of graphical text editing experience
> > that people are used to,
>
>
> This is another step trying to make Fedora end-user
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:37:41PM -0400, Digimer wrote:
> digimer here, sorry, I'm not sure why my address was rejected. I can
> also be reached at 'mke...@alteeve.ca'.
Could you update it in FAS and check if whichever account you use in FAS has a
corresponding bugzilla account?
Thanks!
Pierre
Dne 24. 06. 20 v 4:40 Przemek Klosowski via devel napsal(a):
> dnf -C list extras
How do I skip packages which are installed from @@commandline? Is there
anything else than "grep -v"?
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 08:50:23PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> This is another step trying to make Fedora end-user friendly while the only
> effect is making it hostile to developers. As Fedora will never be used by
How does changing the default editor make Fedora hostile to developers?
(I
On 6/24/20 12:03 PM, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
Thanks. I found another tutorial (from RedHat) which basically says:
1. Implement your service, give it a new SELinux type and run it.
2. Collect all the complaints from SELinux.
3. Use audit2allow to convert them to rules.
4. Repeat until you don't get
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:18:59 +0200, Ben Cotton wrote:
> In contrast, Nano offers the kind of graphical text editing experience
> that people are used to,
This is another step trying to make Fedora end-user friendly while the only
effect is making it hostile to developers. As Fedora will never be
Dne 24. 06. 20 v 21:03 Iñaki Ucar napsal(a):
> 3. Use audit2allow to convert them to rules.
> 4. Repeat until you don't get any more complaints.
>
> And I cannot believe my eyes. Is this *really* the way to implement
> SELinux policies? It seems like a joke to me.
No. It is a bit complicated.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851062
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Doc Type|---
Tomas Hrnciar writes:
> We would like to kindly ask you to add explicit BuildRequires for
> python3-setuptools to packages where setuptools is used. It will help
> us with testing new versions of setuptools in the future or with
> decoupling Python and setuptools. Today, if we want to know if a
Dne 25. 06. 20 v 16:06 Igor Raits napsal(a):
> I think removing that dependency is simply wrong. It essentially means
> that one would not be able to use those scripts without dependency
> being installed.
Simply removing is wrong. But I see nothing bad on moving it to Recommends or
even
On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 20:18 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 06:10:23PM -, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> > Isn't this how bodhi always worked? One week (two weeks for EPEL) and
> > if doesn't get negative karma, it gets pushed - no matter if it's an
> > enhancement, or a bugfix, or
On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 19:58 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm really surprised by Bodhi behaviour with this update:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6010469bfb
> (ladvd-1.1.2-7.fc32, Fix SELinux AVC denials)
>
> I've set Stable Karma to +3. Update was pushed
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 06:10:23PM -, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> Isn't this how bodhi always worked? One week (two weeks for EPEL) and
> if doesn't get negative karma, it gets pushed - no matter if it's an
> enhancement, or a bugfix, or a security update.
I don't think so. I remember my updates
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 7:20 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Let's make Fedora more approachable, by having a default editor that
> doesn't require specialist knowledge to use.
One could argue that this adds to the experience!
> (These arguments would apply
> just as well if git picked Vim. vi is
Isn't this how bodhi always worked? One week (two weeks for EPEL) and if
doesn't get negative karma, it gets pushed - no matter if it's an enhancement,
or a bugfix, or a security update.
When creating an update from the web panel, you can un-check the "Auto-request
stable based on time?" box
Hi,
I'm really surprised by Bodhi behaviour with this update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6010469bfb
(ladvd-1.1.2-7.fc32, Fix SELinux AVC denials)
I've set Stable Karma to +3. Update was pushed to testing,
gathered exactly zero reviews with +/- karma. After a
On 6/25/20 1:18 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
Let's make Fedora more approachable, by having a default editor that
doesn't require specialist knowledge to use.
I would like to counter propose that we make ed the default editor :P
___
devel mailing list --
If, like me, you're surprised that it's suddenly the end of June, you
may appreciate this reminder of upcoming Fedora 33 deadlines.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 1:56 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> * 2020-06-30: Proposal deadline for Changes requiring mass rebuild
> * 2020-06-30: Proposal deadline for
If, like me, you're surprised that it's suddenly the end of June, you
may appreciate this reminder of upcoming Fedora 33 deadlines.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 1:56 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> * 2020-06-30: Proposal deadline for Changes requiring mass rebuild
> * 2020-06-30: Proposal deadline for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecatePytoml
== Summary ==
The {{package|python-pytoml}} ({{package|python3-pytoml}}) package
will be
[https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/
deprecated] in [[Releases/33|Fedora 33]]. Pytoml is deprecated
upstream
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UseNanoByDefault
== Summary ==
Let's make Fedora more approachable, by having a default editor that
doesn't require specialist knowledge to use.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:chrismurphy| Chris Murphy]]
* Email: chrismur...@fedoraproject.org
== Detailed
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecatePytoml
== Summary ==
The {{package|python-pytoml}} ({{package|python3-pytoml}}) package
will be
[https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/
deprecated] in [[Releases/33|Fedora 33]]. Pytoml is deprecated
upstream
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UseNanoByDefault
== Summary ==
Let's make Fedora more approachable, by having a default editor that
doesn't require specialist knowledge to use.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:chrismurphy| Chris Murphy]]
* Email: chrismur...@fedoraproject.org
== Detailed
I agree with Jeff.
It looks good, go for it.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:49 AM Jeff Sheltren wrote:
>
> Hi Jos, seems fine to me; I'd say go for it!
>
> -Jeff
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:58 PM Jos de Kloe wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I received a user request to update eccodes, see:
>>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 03:56:42PM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Am 25.06.20 um 14:55 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
> > Here is an updated list:
> >
> > @certbot-sig
> >
> > Please do try to fix this soon!
>
> I'd love to but unfortunately I'm only a user for the certbot sig and even
> though
digimer here, sorry, I'm not sure why my address was rejected. I can
also be reached at 'mke...@alteeve.ca'.
Madi
On 2020-06-25 9:08 a.m., Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> As announced on devel-announce [1] I have sent an email to each account listed
> on dist-git to be
Le 25/06/2020 à 16:56, Sérgio Basto a écrit :
> also [1] could help it says that you need create a directory
>
> also the package is orphan and was retired on F33 , I may take it ,if
> have an easy fix ...
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738884
Worked like a charm.
Thanks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850767
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
Hi Jos, seems fine to me; I'd say go for it!
-Jeff
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:58 PM Jos de Kloe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I received a user request to update eccodes, see:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850633
>
> Currently EPEL7 and EPEL8 have version 2.14 that was published by
>
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 14:57, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> What you need is to disable is the "shebang dependency generator" from RPM.
> The
> easiest way is to use:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering/
> %global __requires_exclude
Hi Zamir,
thanks and no problem. I even forgot about this issue.
Regards
Raphael
Am 24.06.20 um 14:47 schrieb Zamir SUN:
On 12/11/18 7:52 AM, Raphael Groner wrote:
Hi,
writing to general devel list intentionally. No idea if all members
of lxqt-sig list can read here, too and especially
On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 09:15 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been using the nifty apt-cacher-ng package cache successfully
> > on Debian.
> >
> > Now I'd like to run it on our local server running CentOS 7. I
> > installed the
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850915
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jples...@redhat.com
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
